DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

NVDA vs NVYY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of NVIDIA Corporation and GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 21, 2026

ETFs94
Total AUM$11.9B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

GraniteShares is known for offering specialized ETF strategies that extend beyond traditional equity and bond investing, particularly through structured products and income-focused solutions. The firm manages 48 ETFs organized around distinct fund families including Autocallable products, Commodities, Income strategies, Leveraged exposures, and their YieldBOOST line designed to enhance distributions. GraniteShares targets investors seeking alternative income generation methods and commodity access, with popular tickers like AHD, CRY, and FBL representing their diverse approach to yield enhancement and alternative asset classes.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on NVYY.

Side-by-side snapshot

NVDANVYY
Full nameNVIDIA CorporationGraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF
IssuerGraniteShares
Last Close$203.28 as of July 21, 2026$12.40 as of July 21, 2026
Distribution yield0.02%46.28%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9649
Expense ratio1.15%
AUM$36.3M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyWeekly
Underlying indexNVIDIA (NVDA)
ObjectiveDesigns and manufactures graphics processing units (GPUs) and system-on-chip units for gaming, professional visualization, data centers, and automotive markets. A leader in AI infrastructure and accelerated computing.Seeks current income with secondary exposure to leveraged NVIDIA ETFs through a derivatives-based options strategy utilizing the underlying NVDA ETF as the reference asset.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A05/13/2025
Beta2.2111.1885
Last dividend$0.2500$0.1104
Ex-dividend date06/04/202607/17/2026

Bottom lineChoose NVDA if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee. Choose NVYY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 46.28%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: NVYY's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while NVDA keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

NVDA has outpaced NVYY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 18.77% total return against 6.56%. Measured from May 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — NVDA has compounded at 46.04% a year versus 25.03% for NVYY. NVYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.2% against 35.9% for NVDA. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince May 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
NVDA7.77%18.77%46.04%35.9%0.360.51-20.2%
NVYY-2.58%6.56%25.03%24.2%0.080.10-14.9%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 20, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since May 2025” measures every fund from May 13, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

NVYY offers the higher yield at 46.28% vs 0.02% for NVDA. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, NVDA would generate roughly $0.17/month, while NVYY would produce $385.67/month, at current distribution rates.

NVDA yield0.02%
NVYY yield46.28%
Monthly diff on $10K$385.50

Cost & efficiency

NVYY charges a 1.15% expense ratio — roughly $1,150 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). NVDA is a stock, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.

NVYY ER1.15%

Strategy & risk

NVDA is a stock, while NVYY tracks NVIDIA (NVDA). Beta is 2.211 for NVDA and 1.1885 for NVYY, indicating NVYY is less volatile relative to the market.

NVDA beta2.211
NVYY beta1.1885

Security details

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. NVYY is managed by GraniteShares (launched 05/13/2025) with $36.3M in assets.

NVYY AUM$36.3M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

Is NVDA or NVYY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. NVYY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between NVDA and NVYY?

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) tracks NVIDIA (NVDA). They are issued by — and GraniteShares respectively.

Can I hold both NVDA and NVYY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, NVDA or NVYY?

NVYY charges a 1.15% expense ratio. NVDA is a stock, not a fund, so it has no expense ratio — owning it directly costs nothing in ongoing fund fees.

How much income does $10,000 in NVDA vs NVYY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in NVDA would generate roughly $0.17 per month ($2.00 annually). The same in NVYY would produce about $385.67 per month ($4,628.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, NVDA or NVYY?

NVDA has outpaced NVYY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 18.77% total return against 6.56%. Measured from May 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — NVDA has compounded at 46.04% a year versus 25.03% for NVYY. NVYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.2% against 35.9% for NVDA. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

NVDA vs NVYY — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

NVDA is the semiconductor giant itself—a direct equity stake in NVIDIA, the dominant designer of AI accelerators and GPUs. NVYY is a newly launched options-income ETF that wraps NVDA exposure inside a synthetic income strategy, targeting a 50.54% annualized yield through weekly distributions. The core distinction: NVDA offers chip-company fundamentals and capital appreciation; NVYY trades potential price growth for aggressive income via derivatives overlay.

How they differ

The biggest difference is structure and yield source. NVDA distributes a modest 0.47% quarterly dividend from actual earnings, while NVYY uses covered-call and options strategies to extract 50.54% annual income—a 100x spread that comes from writing call options on NVDA itself, not from NVIDIA's business performance. Second, NVYY is brand new (inception May 2025) with only $47.1M in assets, while NVDA is an established mega-cap with decades of operating history. Third, NVYY charges 1.15% in annual fees and rebalances its options positions weekly; NVDA has minimal holding costs. Beta-adjusted risk also differs: NVDA's 2.211 beta means it swings twice as hard as the market, while NVYY's 1.1885 beta reflects some dampening from the options overlay, though that synthetic insurance carries hidden costs.

Who each is best for

NVDA: Investors seeking exposure to secular AI infrastructure demand and NVIDIA's competitive moat, with tolerance for high equity volatility and a multi-year holding horizon. Capital appreciation is the primary return source.

NVYY: Fits income-focused investors willing to accept capped upside and NAV erosion in exchange for weekly cash flow, and who understand that the fund's yield is paid partly through call-option premium and decay rather than business fundamentals. Suited for those with a shorter time horizon or existing conviction that NVDA will trade sideways to modestly up.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme distribution yields. NVYY distributes 50.54% annualized, far exceeding any reasonable return from holding NVDA stock alone. This math implies regular return-of-capital treatment and principal shrinkage; investors are being paid partly from their own capital, not earnings.
  • Options-overlay cap on appreciation. NVYY's yield is generated by selling calls against NVDA. If NVDA rallies sharply, those calls get called away or the fund's upside is capped, turning a bull case into foregone gains. The 1.15% expense ratio is paid from the call premium, which means rising implied volatility helps; falling IV hurts.
  • Newness and liquidity. NVYY launched in May 2025 with only $47.1M in AUM. Small ETF assets can lead to wider bid-ask spreads, faster closure risk if assets don't grow, and limited track record for the options strategy across a full market cycle.
  • NVDA's inherent semiconductor and AI-cycle risk. Both holdings inherit exposure to cyclical chip demand, competitive pressure from AMD and others, and the possibility that AI capex growth moderates. NVDA's 2.211 beta amplifies downside when sentiment shifts.
  • Weekly rebalancing and tax drag. NVYY's weekly distributions and options adjustments create turnover friction; in taxable accounts, frequent short-term capital gains are likely. NVDA's quarterly dividend is simpler from a tax perspective.

Bottom line

If you want equity upside and can live with volatility, NVDA aligns with NVIDIA's long-term business trajectory. If you prioritize current income and accept that principal will decline to fund it, NVYY's weekly payouts appeal—but understand you're buying a derivatives trade, not a chip company, and the fund's youth and small size add structural risk. Past performance of either security does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.