DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

NVDA vs NVYY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of NVIDIA Corporation and GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated June 24, 2026

ETFs51
Total AUM$9.35B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

GraniteShares is known for offering specialized ETF strategies that extend beyond traditional equity and bond investing, particularly through structured products and income-focused solutions. The firm manages 48 ETFs organized around distinct fund families including Autocallable products, Commodities, Income strategies, Leveraged exposures, and their YieldBOOST line designed to enhance distributions. GraniteShares targets investors seeking alternative income generation methods and commodity access, with popular tickers like AHD, CRY, and FBL representing their diverse approach to yield enhancement and alternative asset classes.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on NVYY.

Side-by-side snapshot

NVDANVYY
Full nameNVIDIA CorporationGraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF
IssuerGraniteShares
Last Close$200.04 as of June 24, 2026$12.94 as of June 24, 2026
Distribution yield0.50%50.43%
Expense ratio1.15%
AUM$47.1M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyWeekly
Underlying indexNVIDIA (NVDA)
ObjectiveDesigns and manufactures graphics processing units (GPUs) and system-on-chip units for gaming, professional visualization, data centers, and automotive markets. A leader in AI infrastructure and accelerated computing.Seeks current income with secondary exposure to leveraged NVIDIA ETFs through a derivatives-based options strategy utilizing the underlying NVDA ETF as the reference asset.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date01/22/199905/13/2025
Beta2.2021.1885
Last dividend$0.2500$0.1255
Ex-dividend date06/04/202606/06/2025

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

NVDA has outpaced NVYY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 38.94% total return against 17.95%. Measured from May 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — NVDA has compounded at 47.62% a year versus 27.44% for NVYY. NVYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.8% against 35.5% for NVDA. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince May 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
NVDA6.05%38.94%47.62%35.5%0.801.17-20.2%
NVYY-2.11%17.95%27.44%24.8%0.490.65-14.9%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of June 23, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since May 2025” measures every fund from May 13, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

NVYY offers the higher yield at 50.43% vs 0.50% for NVDA. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, NVDA would generate roughly $4.17/month, while NVYY would produce $420.25/month, at current distribution rates.

NVDA yield0.50%
NVYY yield50.43%
Monthly diff on $10K$416.08

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, NVDA would cost approximately $0 in fees vs $1,150 for NVYY (simplified, not compounded). The $1,150.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

NVDA ER
NVYY ER1.15%

Strategy & risk

NVDA is a stock, while NVYY tracks NVIDIA (NVDA) with a basket approach. Beta is 2.202 for NVDA and 1.1885 for NVYY, indicating NVYY is less volatile relative to the market.

NVDA beta2.202
NVYY beta1.1885

Fund details

NVDA is managed by — (launched 01/22/1999) with — in assets. NVYY is managed by GraniteShares (launched 05/13/2025) with $47.1M in assets.

NVDA AUM
NVYY AUM$47.1M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is NVDA or NVYY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. NVYY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between NVDA and NVYY?

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) tracks NVIDIA (NVDA) with a basket approach. They are issued by — and GraniteShares respectively.

Can I hold both NVDA and NVYY?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, NVDA or NVYY?

NVDA has an expense ratio of — while NVYY charges 1.15%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in NVDA vs NVYY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in NVDA would generate roughly $4.17 per month ($50.00 annually). The same in NVYY would produce about $420.25 per month ($5,043.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, NVDA or NVYY?

NVDA has outpaced NVYY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 38.94% total return against 17.95%. Measured from May 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — NVDA has compounded at 47.62% a year versus 27.44% for NVYY. NVYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.8% against 35.5% for NVDA. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.