DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

NVDY vs ULTY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • NVDYInvestors who are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.
  • ULTYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 60.51%, generated by selling options premium.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

NVDY has outpaced ULTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 25.82% total return against -7.77%. Measured from Feb 2024 — the start of shared available history — NVDY has compounded at 38.95% a year versus 2.26% for ULTY. ULTY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 22.4% against 30.4% for NVDY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Feb 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
NVDY20.16%25.82%38.95%30.4%0.610.87-15.3%
ULTY8.44%-7.77%2.26%22.4%-0.56-0.73-24.2%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Feb 2024” measures every fund from February 29, 2024 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Distribution rate, SEC yield and return of capital

MetricNVDYULTY
Forward distribution rate35.67%60.51%
Trailing 12-month yield55.35%98.42%
30-day SEC yield2.53%-0.75%
Return of capital93.24%100.00%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Total return against the stated underlying is on NVDY vs NVDA.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricNVDYULTY
Full nameYieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETFYieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Underlying indexNVIDIA (NVDA)Basket (High Volatility stocks)
Last Close$12.74 as of September 30, 2026$25.29 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate35.67%60.51%
Trailing 12-month yield55.35%98.42%
30-day SEC yield2.53%-0.75%
Distribution Safety Score™ 5651
Safety-Adjusted Yield 19.98%30.86%
Expense ratio1.09%1.40%
AUM$1.40B$721M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
ObjectiveYieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF seeks current income while providing indirect exposure to the share price returns of NVIDIA Corporation common stock, subject to a limit on potential investment gains. The fund does not invest directly in NVIDIA Corporation; it uses a synthetic covered call strategy built from standardized exchange-traded options.Actively managed fund that seeks weekly income from a rotating basket of U.S.-listed securities, using traditional and synthetic covered calls designed to produce higher income when the underlying holdings are more volatile.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date05/09/202302/28/2024
Beta1.431.3581
Last dividend$0.0874 declared, pays 10/02/2026$0.2943 declared, pays 10/01/2026
Ex-dividend date10/01/2026 upcoming09/30/2026

Bottom lineChoose NVDY if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout. Choose ULTY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 60.51%, generated by selling options premium. NVDY and ULTY both use option or derivative overlays. Their tradeoff is the underlying exposure, how each option strategy is implemented, and the yield each targets; either overlay can limit upside participation, so neither offers uncapped price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. NVDY and ULTY generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.
  • Daily leverage reset. ULTY targets a multiple of the index's DAILY move, resetting every session. Over weeks and months the compounding of daily resets (volatility decay) can drag returns far below the stated multiple, especially in choppy markets — and losses are magnified the same way gains are.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs62
Total AUM$10.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on NVDY and ULTY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) and ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

ULTY offers the higher yield at 60.51% vs 35.67% for NVDY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

NVDY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 1.09% compared to 1.40%.

They have different reference exposures: NVDY is linked to NVIDIA (NVDA) while ULTY is linked to Basket (High Volatility stocks), which means their performance drivers differ.

NVDY is the larger fund by assets ($1.40B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose NVDY

YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF

  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 1.09% expense ratio vs 1.40% for ULTY.

Choose ULTY

YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — ULTY distributes roughly 60.51% from selling options premium, vs 35.67% for NVDY.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, NVDY would generate roughly $68.60 cash per distribution, while ULTY would produce $116.37 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

NVDY yield35.67%
ULTY yield60.51%
Cash diff on $10K$47.77

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, NVDY would cost approximately $1,090 in fees vs $1,400 for ULTY (simplified, not compounded). The $310.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

NVDY ER1.09%
ULTY ER1.40%

Strategy & risk

NVDY tracks NVIDIA (NVDA) with a covered call approach, while ULTY is actively managed around Basket (High Volatility stocks) exposure with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.43 for NVDY and 1.3581 for ULTY, making ULTY the less volatile of the two by this measure.

NVDY beta1.43
ULTY beta1.3581

Fund details

NVDY is managed by YieldMax (launched 05/09/2023) with $1.40B in assets. ULTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 02/28/2024) with $721M in assets.

NVDY AUM$1.40B
ULTY AUM$721M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for NVDY and ULTY?

NVDY currently distributes 35.67% and ULTY 60.51%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is NVDY or ULTY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. ULTY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between NVDY and ULTY?

NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks NVIDIA (NVDA) with a covered call approach, while ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) is actively managed around Basket (High Volatility stocks) exposure with a covered call approach. They are issued by YieldMax and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both NVDY and ULTY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is NVDY or ULTY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — NVDY scores 56, ULTY scores 51, so NVDY's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, NVDY or ULTY?

NVDY has an expense ratio of 1.09% while ULTY charges 1.40%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in NVDY vs ULTY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in NVDY would generate roughly $68.60 cash per distribution ($3,567.00 annually). The same in ULTY would produce about $116.37 cash per distribution ($6,051.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, NVDY or ULTY?

NVDY has outpaced ULTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 25.82% total return against -7.77%. Measured from Feb 2024 — the start of shared available history — NVDY has compounded at 38.95% a year versus 2.26% for ULTY. ULTY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 22.4% against 30.4% for NVDY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

NVDY vs ULTY — at a glance

Generated September 27, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

NVDY and ULTY are both weekly-income ETFs using synthetic covered call strategies, but they differ fundamentally in scope and yield source. NVDY synthetically replicates a covered call on NVIDIA stock alone—providing indirect exposure to NVDA with capped upside. ULTY is an actively managed fund that rotates through a basket of high-volatility U.S. stocks, layering traditional and synthetic covered calls to harvest volatility premiums across multiple holdings.

How they differ

The biggest difference is portfolio breadth: NVDY tracks a single stock (NVIDIA), while ULTY actively selects and rotates through a diversified basket of high-volatility equities. This makes NVDY a concentrated play on NVIDIA's option premium and price movement, whereas ULTY spreads its income across multiple issuers and can tilt toward whichever holdings offer the richest volatility at any time.

Second, ULTY's distribution rate of 60.51% substantially exceeds NVDY's 35.67%, reflecting ULTY's ability to chase volatility across a larger opportunity set. That premium comes with a higher expense ratio (1.40% versus 1.09%) and an active management fee. NVDY's 1.09% expense ratio is lower partly because it tracks a single reference asset and requires no stock-selection decisions.

Third, NVDA's beta of 2.217 is notably higher than ULTY's 1.3581, signaling that NVDY amplifies broad market moves more sharply. NVDA is a mega-cap, high-beta name; ULTY's rotating basket may dampen volatility swings relative to any single constituent, though its focus on high-volatility stocks keeps overall risk material.

Who each is best for

NVDY: Fits investors who want direct (if capped) exposure to NVIDIA's price movement while collecting weekly income from call premiums on that single holding. Useful for those with conviction in NVDA but who accept a ceiling on capital appreciation.

ULTY: Designed for investors seeking higher current income from equity-linked derivatives without committing to a single stock. Suits those comfortable with active management and willing to tolerate the basket-rotation approach in exchange for potentially richer premium capture across volatile names.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at elevated distribution yields. Both funds distribute over 40% annually; when annualized payouts exceed underlying equity gains, NAV per share trends downward over time, requiring rolling capital loss absorption or renewed premium generation to sustain the distribution rate.
  • Covered call cap on upside. NVDY caps gains on NVIDIA appreciation; if NVDA rallies sharply, the synthetic call structure limits the fund's ability to participate. ULTY faces the same ceiling, though it can rotate into fresh high-volatility names if prior positions max out.
  • Concentration and single-name risk (NVDY). NVDY's entire income stream depends on NVIDIA's options market liquidity, implied volatility, and price behavior. Deterioration in NVDA's IV or a structural decline in the stock directly shrinks premium collection.
  • Active management and basket turnover risk (ULTY). ULTY's value depends on the manager's stock-selection and volatility-timing skill. Frequent rotations can incur slippage and tax drag; underperformance relative to a buy-and-hold high-volatility portfolio would reduce net income.
  • Options market and liquidity risk. Both funds rely on the ability to originate and roll standardized equity options at reasonable spreads. A sharp decline in options liquidity or implied volatility across their underlying(s) would compress premium availability.

Bottom line

If you want concentrated exposure to NVIDIA's volatility and accept a cap on upside, NVDY offers a simpler, lower-cost structure; if you prefer wider diversification and higher current income in exchange for active management and basket rotation, ULTY's 60.51% rate reflects that added complexity. Both carry meaningful NAV erosion risk at these distribution levels—neither is suited to passive wealth preservation. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.