DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

O vs VNQ: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Realty Income Corporation and Vanguard Real Estate ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 13, 2026

Best for

  • OInvestors who want higher current income (5.25% vs 3.52% for VNQ).
  • VNQInvestors who want real-estate income and inflation sensitivity.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricOVNQ
Full nameRealty Income CorporationVanguard Real Estate ETF
IssuerRealty IncomeVanguard
Last Close$62.59 as of August 13, 2026$97.31 as of August 13, 2026
Distribution yield5.25%3.52%
Distribution Safety Score™ 10092
Expense ratio0.12%
AUM$39.3B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyQuarterly
Underlying indexMSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/50 Index
ObjectiveA real estate investment trust that invests in freestanding, single-tenant commercial properties subject to long-term net lease agreements. Known as "The Monthly Dividend Company," Realty Income has a long track record of monthly dividend payments and consistent dividend growth.Track the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index.
Asset classReal EstateEquity
Inception dateN/A09/23/2004
Beta0.720.99
Last dividend$0.2710$0.8554
Ex-dividend date07/31/202606/24/2026

Bottom lineChoose O if you want higher current income (5.25% vs 3.52% for VNQ). Choose VNQ if you want real-estate income and inflation sensitivity.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4657B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VNQ.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

O has outpaced VNQ over the trailing twelve months, posting a 14.56% total return against 14.25%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — VNQ has compounded at 4.88% a year, ahead of O at 4.27%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince Sep 2004Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
O12.09%14.56%8.34%3.25%4.27%10.50%18.3%0.190.27-19.4%
VNQ12.08%14.25%9.82%2.16%4.88%7.63%16.9%0.290.41-17.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 12, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Sep 2004” measures every fund from September 29, 2004 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

O (Realty Income Corporation) is a real estate investment trust, while VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

O offers the higher yield at 5.25% vs 3.52% for VNQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, O would generate roughly $43.75/month, while VNQ would produce $29.33/month, at current distribution rates.

O yield5.25%
VNQ yield3.52%
Monthly diff on $10K$14.42

Cost & efficiency

VNQ charges a 0.12% expense ratio — roughly $120 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). O is a real estate investment trust, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.

VNQ ER0.12%

Strategy & risk

O is a real estate investment trust, while VNQ tracks MSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/50 Index with a dividend approach. Beta is 0.72 for O and 0.99 for VNQ, indicating O is less volatile relative to the market.

O beta0.72
VNQ beta0.99

Security details

O (Realty Income Corporation) is a real estate investment trust. VNQ is managed by Vanguard (launched 09/23/2004) with $39.3B in assets.

VNQ AUM$39.3B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for O and VNQ?

O currently distributes 5.25% and VNQ 3.52%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is O or VNQ better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. O currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between O and VNQ?

O (Realty Income Corporation) is a real estate investment trust, while VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) tracks MSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/50 Index with a dividend approach. They are issued by Realty Income and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both O and VNQ?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is O or VNQ safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — O scores 100, VNQ scores 92, so O's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. O has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.72 vs 0.99 for VNQ). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, O or VNQ?

VNQ charges a 0.12% expense ratio. O is a real estate investment trust, not a fund, so it has no expense ratio — owning it directly costs nothing in ongoing fund fees.

How much income does $10,000 in O vs VNQ generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in O would generate roughly $43.75 per month ($525.00 annually). The same in VNQ would produce about $29.33 per month ($352.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, O or VNQ?

O has outpaced VNQ over the trailing twelve months, posting a 14.56% total return against 14.25%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — VNQ has compounded at 4.88% a year, ahead of O at 4.27%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

O vs VNQ — at a glance

Generated August 8, 2026.

Overview

Realty Income (O) is a net-lease REIT focused on single-tenant commercial properties, while Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is a broad-market index fund tracking the entire U.S. REIT universe. O concentrates on a specific property type and lease structure; VNQ diversifies across residential, commercial, industrial, and specialty real estate with exposure to dozens of REITs. The core distinction is focused strategy versus diversified indexing.

How they differ

O's 5.19% distribution rate substantially exceeds VNQ's 3.48%, reflecting both the REIT's higher leverage and its net-lease model—tenants cover property operating costs, inflating cash flow to shareholders. O pays monthly (a signature feature) while VNQ distributes quarterly. O carries a beta of 0.72, suggesting lower volatility than the broader REIT market that VNQ tracks at a 1.0 beta. VNQ's 0.12% expense ratio and $39.3B in assets provide low-cost, passive exposure; O operates as an actively managed single-security position with the governance and operational risks that entails. VNQ's diversification spans asset types; O is concentrated in net-lease commercial real estate, making it vulnerable to tenant credit stress and the structural risks of long-term fixed leases.

Who each is best for

O: Fits investors seeking predictable monthly income from a single holding and comfortable with concentration in net-lease commercial property; appeals to those who value the behavioral anchor of frequent, reliable distributions and don't require broad REIT diversification.

VNQ: Designed for investors wanting diversified REIT exposure across residential, industrial, and other property types without picking individual REITs; suits those prioritizing low fees and market-rate total returns over yield maximization.

Key risks to know

  • Tenant concentration and credit risk (O): Long-term net leases transfer operating responsibility to tenants but expose O to tenant default and lease non-renewal; economic weakness or sector-specific trouble (e.g., retail property vacancy) can stress both lease coverage and distributions.
  • Net-lease structure inflexibility (O): Fixed lease terms limit O's ability to reset rents with inflation or market cycles; if inflation erodes tenant profitability, lease renewal or rent growth may lag, pressuring future distributions.
  • Broad sector exposure (VNQ): Diversification reduces single-tenant risk but creates exposure to cyclical property types (retail, hospitality, office) and lingering uncertainty around office-space demand in a hybrid-work environment.
  • NAV and distribution sustainability (O): The 5.19% yield, paid monthly, approaches levels where ongoing NAV erosion becomes a material consideration; monitor whether distributions are funded by underlying property appreciation or increasingly by return-of-capital treatment.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity (both): REITs financed with floating-rate debt face higher borrowing costs in a rising-rate environment; both O and VNQ holdings are vulnerable to cap-rate compression if bond yields decline or expansion if rates rise.

Bottom line

O offers higher current income and monthly frequency for investors comfortable holding a single net-lease REIT; VNQ provides diversified REIT exposure at minimal cost for those seeking market-rate returns across the sector. If current monthly income and stable tenant leases appeal to you, O's structure may fit; if you want broad real estate diversification with low fees, VNQ aligns with that goal. Past performance does not guarantee future distributions or returns.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.