DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SCHG vs SCHD: Appreciation or a Dividend Screen?

A head-to-head comparison of Schwab's large-cap growth ETF and U.S. Dividend Equity ETF covering income versus appreciation, cost, and portfolio role.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • SCHDInvestors who want higher current income (3.28% vs 0.41% for SCHG).
  • SCHGInvestors who want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

SCHD has outpaced SCHG over the trailing twelve months, posting a 24.24% total return against 13.54%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — SCHG has compounded at 18.77% a year, ahead of SCHD at 12.52%. SCHD has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 13.2% against 19.4% for SCHG. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Oct 2011Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SCHD20.19%24.24%15.79%9.12%12.52%13.08%13.2%0.781.13-16.1%
SCHG10.92%13.54%25.72%14.59%18.77%17.58%19.4%0.951.37-23.4%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Oct 2011” measures every fund from October 20, 2011 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSCHDSCHG
Full nameSchwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETFSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
IssuerSchwabSchwab
Underlying indexDow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Last Close$32.53 as of September 30, 2026$35.93 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate3.28%0.41%
Trailing 12-month yield3.24%0.39%
Distribution Safety Score™ 100100
Safety-Adjusted Yield 3.28%0.41%
Expense ratio0.06%0.04%
AUM$110B$64.3B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
ObjectiveSeeks to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, which measures the performance of high dividend yielding stocks issued by U.S. companies with a record of consistently paying dividends, selected for fundamental strength relative to their peers based on financial ratios.Seeks to track the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, holding the components ranked 1-750 by full market capitalization that are classified as growth.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/20/201112/11/2009
Beta0.561.22
Last dividend$0.2665$0.037
Ex-dividend date09/23/202609/23/2026

Bottom lineChoose SCHD if you want higher current income (3.28% vs 0.41% for SCHG). Choose SCHG if you want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside.

SCHG vs SCHD: growth or a dividend screen?

Same issuer, opposite jobs. SCHG is large-cap growth — most of the return has to come from price. SCHD screens US dividend payers for quality. Cost is not the decision.

SCHDSCHG
What it ownsEstablished US dividend payersLarge-cap US growth stocks
Where returns come fromDividends plus price changeMostly share-price appreciation
Expense ratio0.06%0.04%
Distribution rate3.28%0.41%
Typical roleQuality US dividend coreUS growth sleeve

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs33
Total AUM$612B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Schwab is a major provider of low-cost, broad-based ETFs known for making investing accessible to individual investors through its discount brokerage platform. The issuer's fund lineup spans multiple categories including core index funds, dividend and income-focused strategies, factor-based approaches, international exposure, fixed income, and digital assets, with popular core holdings like SCHB (U.S. broad market) and SCHD (dividend appreciation) alongside more specialized thematic offerings. Schwab's ETF suite is characterized by its breadth across asset classes and investment styles, competitive expense ratios, and integration with its retail brokerage ecosystem.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SCHD and SCHG.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SCHD offers the higher yield at 3.28% vs 0.41% for SCHG. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SCHG is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.04% compared to 0.06%.

They have different reference exposures: SCHD is linked to Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index while SCHG is linked to Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SCHD is the larger fund by assets ($110B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose SCHD

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

  • Want higher current income — SCHD yields 3.28% vs 0.41% for SCHG.
  • Want a quality-dividend tilt — screened payers rather than the broad index.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.6 vs 1.2 for SCHG.

Choose SCHG

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

  • Want a growth tilt and can accept larger swings for more upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.04% expense ratio vs 0.06% for SCHD.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SCHD would generate roughly $82.00 cash per distribution, while SCHG would produce $10.25 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

SCHD yield3.28%
SCHG yield0.41%
Cash diff on $10K$71.75

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SCHD would cost approximately $60 in fees vs $40 for SCHG (simplified, not compounded). The $20.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SCHD ER0.06%
SCHG ER0.04%

Strategy & risk

SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Beta is 0.56 for SCHD and 1.22 for SCHG, making SCHD the less volatile of the two by this measure.

SCHD beta0.56
SCHG beta1.22

Fund details

SCHD is managed by Schwab (launched 10/20/2011) with $110B in assets. SCHG is managed by Schwab (launched 12/11/2009) with $64.3B in assets.

SCHD AUM$110B
SCHG AUM$64.3B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between SCHG and SCHD?

SCHD and SCHG are both low-cost Schwab index funds (0.06% vs 0.04%), so cost is not what separates them — income versus appreciation is. SCHD screens Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index for established dividend payers and distributes 3.28%, paid quarterly. SCHG holds large-cap growth companies and distributes 0.41%, so nearly all of its expected return has to arrive as share-price appreciation rather than cash in your account. Beta tracks that difference: 0.56 for SCHD against 1.22 for SCHG. Figures as of September 2026.

What is the current distribution rate for SCHD and SCHG?

SCHD currently distributes 3.28% and SCHG 0.41%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is SCHD or SCHG better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SCHD currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both SCHD and SCHG?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is SCHD or SCHG safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: SCHD scores 100, SCHG scores 100. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. SCHD has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.56 vs 1.22 for SCHG). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, SCHD or SCHG?

SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while SCHG charges 0.04%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SCHD vs SCHG generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SCHD would generate roughly $82.00 cash per distribution ($328.00 annually). The same in SCHG would produce about $10.25 cash per distribution ($41.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SCHD or SCHG?

SCHD has outpaced SCHG over the trailing twelve months, posting a 24.24% total return against 13.54%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — SCHG has compounded at 18.77% a year, ahead of SCHD at 12.52%. SCHD has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 13.2% against 19.4% for SCHG. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SCHD vs SCHG — at a glance

Generated September 26, 2026.

Overview

SCHD and SCHG are both large-cap Schwab ETFs tracking Dow Jones indexes, but they embody opposite ends of the equity style spectrum. SCHD targets high-dividend-yielding stocks with consistent payout histories and moderate valuations, while SCHG holds growth-oriented companies ranked by market cap with minimal dividend focus. The 3.28% yield on SCHD versus 0.41% on SCHG reflects this fundamental strategic divergence.

How they differ

The defining difference is investment style: SCHD selects for dividend yield and financial strength, while SCHG selects for growth characteristics and is cap-weighted within its growth universe. SCHD's 0.56 beta suggests lower volatility relative to broad equities, whereas SCHG's 1.22 beta indicates growth-style amplification of market moves—a 22% sensitivity premium that shows up in bull and bear markets alike.

Income sources diverge sharply. SCHD's 3.28% distribution rate comes primarily from dividends paid by mature, cash-returning companies; SCHG's 0.41% reflects minimal cash distributions and relies on capital appreciation for total return. Expense ratios are both low—0.06% for SCHD and 0.04% for SCHG—leaving strategy and underlying holdings as the real decision point rather than cost.

AUM differs by roughly 40%: SCHD commands $110B versus $64.3B for SCHG, reflecting stronger investor demand for dividend exposure in recent years.

Who each is best for

SCHD: Fits investors seeking steady quarterly income from established, fundamentally sound large-cap names and who favor lower portfolio volatility over capital appreciation.

SCHG: Fits growth-focused investors with longer time horizons who expect returns primarily from stock price appreciation and can tolerate higher sensitivity to market cycles.

Key risks to know

  • Dividend-cut risk in SCHD. Although the index screens for dividend consistency, economic downturns or sector stress can trigger dividend suspensions or cuts, compressing yield and potentially forcing portfolio adjustments. This risk intensifies if recession pressure hits dividend-paying sectors disproportionately.
  • Growth-stock concentration risk in SCHG. The top holdings in growth indexes often cluster in a few mega-cap technology or communications names. Exposure to that concentration is embedded in the index structure; verify holdings overlap with other growth positions before adding SCHG.
  • Style-factor sensitivity. SCHD's low beta and income tilt mean it underperforms in strong bull markets where growth dominates; SCHG's 1.22 beta amplifies downside in bear markets. Neither diversifies the other—they move together broadly, just at different speeds and magnitudes.
  • Interest-rate headwind for valuations. Both funds hold equities sensitive to rate moves, but SCHD's mature, income-paying names and SCHG's high-multiple growth stocks respond differently to Fed policy shifts. Rising rates typically compress growth multiples more sharply than dividend yields.

Bottom line

If you prioritize income stability and lower volatility, SCHD's 3.28% yield and 0.56 beta offer a more conservative equity posture. If you target capital growth and can tolerate higher market sensitivity, SCHG's growth positioning and 0.04% expense ratio suit longer accumulation horizons. These are style bets, not complements—holding both concentrates you in large-cap U.S. equity rather than diversifying within it. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.