DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SMH vs SCHG: A Chip Sleeve, or Broad Growth?

A head-to-head of VanEck's Semiconductor ETF and Schwab's U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF covering concentration, cost, and overlap.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • SCHGInvestors who want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside.
  • SMHInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

SCHG has lagged SMH over the trailing twelve months, posting a 13.54% total return against 89.33%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SMH has compounded at 34.62% a year, against 18.77% for SCHG. SCHG has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 19.4% against 37.1% for SMH. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Dec 2009Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SCHG10.92%13.54%25.72%14.59%18.77%16.54%19.4%0.951.37-23.4%
SMH63.14%89.33%61.74%37.36%34.62%28.44%37.1%1.181.68-35.7%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Dec 2009” measures every fund from December 11, 2009 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSCHGSMH
Full nameSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFVanEck Semiconductor ETF
IssuerSchwabVanEck
Underlying indexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexMVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index
Last Close$35.93 as of September 30, 2026$609.00 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate0.41%0.18%
Trailing 12-month yield0.39%0.18%
Distribution Safety Score™ 10079
Safety-Adjusted Yield 0.41%0.14%
Expense ratio0.04%0.35%
AUM$64.3B$74.6B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyAnnual
ObjectiveSeeks to track the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, holding the components ranked 1-750 by full market capitalization that are classified as growth.Track the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date12/11/200912/20/2011
Beta1.222.06
Last dividend$0.037$1.105
Ex-dividend date09/23/202612/22/2025

Bottom lineChoose SCHG if you want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside. Choose SMH if you want broad equity exposure.

SCHG vs SMH: large-cap growth or chips?

SCHG is a growth style. SMH is an industry bet. They overlap on mega-cap semis and still are not substitutes.

SCHGSMH
What it ownsUS large-cap growthMVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index
Expense ratio0.04%0.35%
Distribution rate0.41%0.18%

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs33
Total AUM$612B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Schwab is a major provider of low-cost, broad-based ETFs known for making investing accessible to individual investors through its discount brokerage platform. The issuer's fund lineup spans multiple categories including core index funds, dividend and income-focused strategies, factor-based approaches, international exposure, fixed income, and digital assets, with popular core holdings like SCHB (U.S. broad market) and SCHD (dividend appreciation) alongside more specialized thematic offerings. Schwab's ETF suite is characterized by its breadth across asset classes and investment styles, competitive expense ratios, and integration with its retail brokerage ecosystem.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SCHG.

ETFs85
Total AUM$171B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VanEck is known for offering specialized and thematic ETFs across diverse asset classes, including commodities, digital assets, and sector-specific investments. The firm's 22-fund lineup spans income-generating options, covered call strategies, and growth-focused equity funds, with popular tickers including GDX (gold miners), SMH (semiconductors), MOAT (competitive advantage stocks), and HODL (bitcoin). VanEck distinguishes itself through niche exposure areas such as digital assets, commodities, and thematic investing strategies, complemented by traditional bond and municipal bond offerings.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SMH.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SCHG offers the higher yield at 0.41% vs 0.18% for SMH. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SCHG is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.04% compared to 0.35%.

They have different reference exposures: SCHG is linked to Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while SMH is linked to MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SMH is the larger fund by assets ($74.6B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SCHG would generate roughly $10.25 cash per distribution, while SMH would produce $18.00 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

SCHG yield0.41%
SMH yield0.18%
Cash diff on $10K$7.75

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SCHG would cost approximately $40 in fees vs $350 for SMH (simplified, not compounded). The $310.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SCHG ER0.04%
SMH ER0.35%

Strategy & risk

SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with a technology approach. Beta is 1.22 for SCHG and 2.06 for SMH, making SCHG the less volatile of the two by this measure.

SCHG beta1.22
SMH beta2.06

Fund details

SCHG is managed by Schwab (launched 12/11/2009) with $64.3B in assets. SMH is managed by VanEck (launched 12/20/2011) with $74.6B in assets.

SCHG AUM$64.3B
SMH AUM$74.6B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between SMH and SCHG?

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) concentrates in listed semiconductor companies. SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) holds US large-cap growth. They can share mega-cap chip names and still be different bets. Cost is 0.35% versus 0.04%; distributions are 0.18% and 0.41% as of September 2026. An industry sleeve versus a growth style is the decision.

What is the current distribution rate for SCHG and SMH?

SCHG currently distributes 0.41% and SMH 0.18%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is SCHG or SMH better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SCHG currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both SCHG and SMH?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is SCHG or SMH safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — SCHG scores 100, SMH scores 79, so SCHG's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. SCHG has also shown lower price volatility (beta 1.22 vs 2.06 for SMH). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, SCHG or SMH?

SCHG has an expense ratio of 0.04% while SMH charges 0.35%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SCHG vs SMH generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SCHG would generate roughly $10.25 cash per distribution ($41.00 annually). The same in SMH would produce about $18.00 cash per distribution ($18.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SCHG or SMH?

SCHG has lagged SMH over the trailing twelve months, posting a 13.54% total return against 89.33%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SMH has compounded at 34.62% a year, against 18.77% for SCHG. SCHG has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 19.4% against 37.1% for SMH. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SCHG vs SMH — at a glance

Generated September 26, 2026.

Overview

SCHG is a broad large-cap growth ETF tracking 750 U.S. stocks classified as growth by market capitalization, while SMH is a concentrated semiconductor-focused ETF holding just 25 companies from the chip industry. The two differ fundamentally in scope: SCHG offers diversified exposure to large-cap growth across all sectors, whereas SMH isolates a single, highly cyclical technology subsector. Both are index-tracking ETFs, but their risk profiles and return drivers are distinct.

How they differ

SCHG holds 750 companies across all growth-classified sectors, while SMH concentrates on 25 semiconductor manufacturers—a single industry subsector. This makes SMH roughly 28 times more concentrated by holding count alone.

SMH's beta of 2.06 nearly doubles SCHG's 1.22, reflecting both semiconductor sector volatility and the amplified swings of a narrow index. Semiconductors are capital-intensive and highly cyclical, with demand driven by chip shortages, geopolitical trade tensions, and macro cycles; broad large-cap growth, by contrast, smooths these shocks across consumer staples, financials, healthcare, and other defensive areas.

SCHG charges 0.04% in expenses—near-zero for an equity ETF—while SMH costs 0.35%, eight times higher. Both funds have large asset bases, though SMH's $74.6B exceeds SCHG's $64.3B, suggesting demand for semiconductor exposure despite the higher fee.

Who each is best for

SCHG: Fits investors seeking broad large-cap growth exposure with minimal drag from fees and volatility below the growth-stock average. Works for core allocations where sector diversification and low costs matter more than concentrated upside.

SMH: Designed for investors with higher risk tolerance who want pure-play semiconductor exposure—betting on chip cycles, AI demand, and industry-specific tailwinds rather than diversified growth. Suits those comfortable with larger drawdowns in exchange for potential outsized gains during chip upcycles.

Key risks to know

  • Concentration risk (SMH). Twenty-five holdings means a handful of mega-cap chip designers or manufacturers (Intel, NVIDIA, TSMC, Samsung, Broadcom, and similar) likely dominate the index. A regulatory shock, product failure, or earnings miss at one name can move the fund sharply.
  • Semiconductor cyclicality (SMH). Demand for chips swings dramatically with inventory cycles, manufacturing capacity, and macroeconomic sentiment. During downturns, SMH can underperform broad equity markets severely.
  • Beta mismatch (SMH vs. SCHG). SMH's 2.06 versus SCHG's 1.22 means SMH amplifies both bull and bear market moves. A 10% market decline would historically correlate to roughly a 20% decline for SMH, while SCHG would decline closer to 12%.

Bottom line

If you want broad, low-cost large-cap growth with steady diversification, SCHG's 0.04% fee, 1.22 beta, and 750-name basket fit a core equity allocation. If you believe semiconductor tailwinds will outpace broader growth and you can tolerate double the volatility and 0.35% in annual costs, SMH offers concentrated exposure to that thesis. Past performance does not predict future results; sector leadership and chip cycles can reverse sharply.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.