DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SCHG vs VOO: A Growth Sleeve, or Broad Large Caps?

A head-to-head of Schwab's U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and Vanguard's S&P 500 ETF covering style tilt, overlap, cost, and core role.

Updated October 2, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • SCHGInvestors who want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside.
  • VOOInvestors who want higher current income (1.03% vs 0.41% for SCHG).

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

SCHG has lagged VOO over the trailing twelve months, posting a 13.73% total return against 16.45%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — SCHG has compounded at 18.87% a year, ahead of VOO at 15.46%. VOO has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 14.8% against 19.4% for SCHG. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Sep 2010Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SCHG12.18%13.73%26.14%14.72%18.87%17.34%19.4%0.971.40-23.4%
VOO13.59%16.45%23.23%13.71%15.46%14.93%14.8%1.111.61-18.7%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Sep 2010” measures every fund from September 9, 2010 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSCHGVOO
Full nameSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFVanguard S&P 500 ETF
IssuerSchwabVanguard
Underlying indexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexS&P 500 Index
Last Close$36.34 as of October 2, 2026$707.54 as of October 2, 2026
Distribution rate0.41%1.03%
Trailing 12-month yield0.38%1.05%
Distribution Safety Score™ 100100
Safety-Adjusted Yield 0.41%1.03%
Expense ratio0.04%0.03%
AUM$64.3B$1041B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
ObjectiveSeeks to track the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, holding the components ranked 1-750 by full market capitalization that are classified as growth.Track the performance of the S&P 500 Index, representing 500 of the largest U.S. companies.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date12/11/200909/07/2010
Beta1.221.0
Last dividend$0.037$1.8226
Ex-dividend date09/23/202609/28/2026

Bottom lineChoose SCHG if you want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside. Choose VOO if you want higher current income (1.03% vs 0.41% for SCHG).

SCHG vs VOO: growth sleeve or the S&P 500?

VOO is every major sector at S&P 500 weights. SCHG is a large-cap growth style. Holding both doubles mega-cap growth names already inside VOO.

SCHGVOO
IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexS&P 500 Index
StyleLarge-cap growthBroad US large caps
Expense ratio0.04%0.03%
Distribution rate0.41%1.03%
If you already own the otherAdds growth concentration on top of VOOAlready includes most SCHG mega caps

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs33
Total AUM$612B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Schwab is a major provider of low-cost, broad-based ETFs known for making investing accessible to individual investors through its discount brokerage platform. The issuer's fund lineup spans multiple categories including core index funds, dividend and income-focused strategies, factor-based approaches, international exposure, fixed income, and digital assets, with popular core holdings like SCHB (U.S. broad market) and SCHD (dividend appreciation) alongside more specialized thematic offerings. Schwab's ETF suite is characterized by its breadth across asset classes and investment styles, competitive expense ratios, and integration with its retail brokerage ecosystem.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SCHG.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4676B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VOO.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

VOO offers the higher yield at 1.03% vs 0.41% for SCHG. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

VOO is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.03% compared to 0.04%.

They have different reference exposures: SCHG is linked to Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while VOO is linked to S&P 500 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

VOO is the larger fund by assets ($1041B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SCHG would generate roughly $10.25 cash per distribution, while VOO would produce $25.75 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

SCHG yield0.41%
VOO yield1.03%
Cash diff on $10K$15.50

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SCHG would cost approximately $40 in fees vs $30 for VOO (simplified, not compounded). The $10.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SCHG ER0.04%
VOO ER0.03%

Strategy & risk

SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index with a large cap approach. Beta is 1.22 for SCHG and 1.0 for VOO, making VOO the less volatile of the two by this measure.

SCHG beta1.22
VOO beta1.0

Fund details

SCHG is managed by Schwab (launched 12/11/2009) with $64.3B in assets. VOO is managed by Vanguard (launched 09/07/2010) with $1041B in assets.

SCHG AUM$64.3B
VOO AUM$1041B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between SCHG and VOO?

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index — about 500 US large caps in every major sector. SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, so it is a growth-style sleeve, more concentrated in mega-cap technology. Cost is 0.04% versus 0.03%. Distributions are 0.41% and 1.03% as of October 2026 — neither is an income fund. Holding both doubles the growth names that already sit inside VOO.

What is the current distribution rate for SCHG and VOO?

SCHG currently distributes 0.41% and VOO 1.03%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is SCHG or VOO better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. VOO currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both SCHG and VOO?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is SCHG or VOO safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: SCHG scores 100, VOO scores 100. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. VOO has also shown lower price volatility (beta 1.00 vs 1.22 for SCHG). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, SCHG or VOO?

SCHG has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VOO charges 0.03%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SCHG vs VOO generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SCHG would generate roughly $10.25 cash per distribution ($41.00 annually). The same in VOO would produce about $25.75 cash per distribution ($103.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SCHG or VOO?

SCHG has lagged VOO over the trailing twelve months, posting a 13.73% total return against 16.45%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — SCHG has compounded at 18.87% a year, ahead of VOO at 15.46%. VOO has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 14.8% against 19.4% for SCHG. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SCHG vs VOO — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Overview

SCHG and VOO are both low-cost, index-tracking ETFs that focus on large U.S. companies, but they use different selection criteria and underlying indexes. SCHG targets the 750 largest U.S. growth stocks via the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth index, while VOO tracks all 500 companies in the S&P 500, which blends growth and value stocks. The key distinction is that SCHG tilts toward companies with growth characteristics, whereas VOO maintains a market-weight approach across the broader large-cap spectrum.

How they differ

SCHG's growth tilt is its defining feature: it holds only stocks classified as growth within the top 750 by market cap, which naturally excludes mature or value-oriented companies. VOO, by contrast, holds all S&P 500 constituents regardless of style, giving it exposure to energy, financials, utilities, and other value-heavy sectors that SCHG underweights or omits.

The yield reflects this difference sharply. VOO distributes at 1.03%, while SCHG yields just 0.41%—a gap driven by VOO's inclusion of higher-dividend payers typical of value stocks. Over a full market cycle, this yield gap compounds.

SCHG carries a beta of 1.22, meaning it amplifies broad market moves; VOO's beta of 1.0 indicates it moves in line with the overall market. Both funds charge minimal expenses—0.03% for VOO and 0.04% for SCHG—but VOO's $1041B in assets dwarfs SCHG's $64.3B, making VOO the larger fund by a significant margin.

Who each is best for

SCHG: Fits investors seeking concentrated exposure to large-company growth stocks and willing to accept higher volatility in exchange for growth potential over longer time horizons. Works for those comfortable with a narrower style focus and lower current income.

VOO: Designed for investors who want broad exposure to the 500 largest U.S. companies without tilting toward any particular style, offering a simpler market-weight foundation that includes both growth and value characteristics. Also fits those prioritizing steady dividend income alongside capital appreciation.

Key risks to know

  • Growth-stock concentration. SCHG's tilt toward growth means its holdings are concentrated in faster-growing, often less profitable companies. In market environments favoring value stocks or economic slowdowns, this tilt can underperform.
  • Higher volatility. With a beta of 1.22, SCHG amplifies market movements in both directions. The fund is more likely to experience sharper declines in downturns than a broad-market index.
  • Sector underweighting. SCHG's exclusion of value-heavy sectors like energy, utilities, and financials leaves it exposed to the inverse risk: if those sectors outperform, SCHG will lag meaningfully.
  • Yield drag in dividend-rich markets. When the market rewards dividend payers, SCHG's sparse 0.41% yield may leave income-focused investors behind relative to higher-dividend alternatives.
  • Index methodology risk. The Dow Jones classification system used by SCHG may differ from how other providers categorize growth vs. value, potentially creating tracking differences if index methodology changes.

Bottom line

If you want full S&P 500 exposure without style bias and prefer steady dividend income, VOO's blend approach and 1.03% yield stand out. If you're willing to accept higher volatility in pursuit of growth-stock outperformance and don't need current income, SCHG's focused tilt offers a narrower, more concentrated bet. Both charge minimal fees and track their respective indexes faithfully; the choice hinges on whether you prefer balanced market exposure or concentrated growth exposure. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.