DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SMH vs SOXL: The Industry, or 3x Daily Chips?

A head-to-head of VanEck's Semiconductor ETF and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X covering daily reset, cost, and why they differ.

Updated October 9, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • SMHInvestors who want broad equity exposure.
  • SOXLInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

SMH has lagged SOXL over the trailing twelve months, posting a 74.88% total return against 226.91%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SOXL has compounded at 47.41% a year, against 34.31% for SMH. SMH has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 37.0% against 118.4% for SOXL. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Mar 2010Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SMH61.62%74.88%60.46%37.30%34.31%28.63%37.0%1.161.65-35.7%
SOXL196.05%226.91%94.31%29.65%47.41%38.92%118.4%0.530.71-87.9%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 9, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Mar 2010” measures every fund from March 11, 2010 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSMHSOXL
Full nameVanEck Semiconductor ETFDirexion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares
IssuerVanEckDirexion
Underlying indexMVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 IndexICE Semiconductor
Last Close$603.33 as of October 9, 2026$139.76 as of October 9, 2026
Distribution rate0.18%0.07%
Trailing 12-month yield0.18%0.07%
Distribution Safety Score™ 7957
Safety-Adjusted Yield 0.14%0.04%
Expense ratio0.35%0.75%
AUM$77.8B$25.6B
Distribution frequencyAnnualQuarterly
ObjectiveTrack the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.Seeks daily investment results of 300% of the performance of the ICE Semiconductor Index.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date12/20/201103/11/2010
Beta2.07.92
Last dividend$1.105$0.093
Ex-dividend date12/22/202509/22/2026

Bottom lineSMH and SOXL are both for investors who want broad equity exposure — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Cost is: SMH charges 0.35% against 0.75% for SOXL, and between two funds this similar that gap comes straight out of your return every year you hold.

SMH vs SOXL: the industry or 3x daily chips?

SMH is listed semiconductors. SOXL seeks three times the daily move and resets. It is a trading vehicle, not a substitute.

SMHSOXL
What you ownMVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index3x daily semiconductors
Expense ratio0.35%0.75%
Daily resetNoYes

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Daily leverage reset. SOXL targets a multiple of the index's DAILY move, resetting every session. Over weeks and months the compounding of daily resets (volatility decay) can drag returns far below the stated multiple, especially in choppy markets — and losses are magnified the same way gains are.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs86
Total AUM$171B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VanEck is known for offering specialized and thematic ETFs across a broad range of asset classes, from traditional equities and fixed income to alternatives and digital assets. The firm's lineup encompasses income-focused funds, sector strategies, commodity exposure, municipal bonds, and innovative thematic products covering areas like blockchain, artificial intelligence, and emerging markets. VanEck serves both income-oriented and growth-focused investors with a diversified product suite that extends beyond conventional equity and bond offerings.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SMH.

ETFs133
Total AUM$73.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Direxion is known for offering leveraged and inverse ETFs that enable investors to amplify or hedge market exposure across various asset classes and market segments. The firm's fund lineup focuses primarily on income-generating strategies and leveraged products, featuring both daily leveraged long positions and inverse (bearish) funds designed for tactical trading and hedging purposes. The issuer maintains a broad range of tickers covering sectors, commodities, cryptocurrencies, and equity indices, appealing to active traders and investors seeking non-traditional exposure management tools.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SOXL.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SMH offers the higher yield at 0.18% vs 0.07% for SOXL. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SMH is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.35% compared to 0.75%.

They have different reference exposures: SMH is linked to MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index while SOXL is linked to ICE Semiconductor, which means their performance drivers differ.

SMH is the larger fund by assets ($77.8B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SMH would generate roughly $18.00 cash per distribution, while SOXL would produce $1.75 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

SMH yield0.18%
SOXL yield0.07%
Cash diff on $10K$16.25

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SMH would cost approximately $350 in fees vs $750 for SOXL (simplified, not compounded). The $400.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SMH ER0.35%
SOXL ER0.75%

Strategy & risk

SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with a technology approach, while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor with a leverage approach. Beta is 2.0 for SMH and 7.92 for SOXL, making SMH the less volatile of the two by this measure.

SMH beta2.0
SOXL beta7.92

Fund details

SMH is managed by VanEck (launched 12/20/2011) with $77.8B in assets. SOXL is managed by Direxion (launched 03/11/2010) with $25.6B in assets.

SMH AUM$77.8B
SOXL AUM$25.6B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between SMH and SOXL?

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) holds listed semiconductor companies. SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares) seeks three times the daily semiconductor move, then resets. SOXL costs 0.75% against 0.35%. Distributions are 0.18% and 0.07% as of October 2026. SOXL is a trading vehicle, not a substitute for SMH.

What is the current distribution rate for SMH and SOXL?

SMH currently distributes 0.18% and SOXL 0.07%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is SMH or SOXL better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SMH currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both SMH and SOXL?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is SMH or SOXL safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — SMH scores 79, SOXL scores 57, so SMH's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. SMH has also shown lower price volatility (beta 2.00 vs 7.92 for SOXL). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, SMH or SOXL?

SMH has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SOXL charges 0.75%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SMH vs SOXL generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SMH would generate roughly $18.00 cash per distribution ($18.00 annually). The same in SOXL would produce about $1.75 cash per distribution ($7.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SMH or SOXL?

SMH has lagged SOXL over the trailing twelve months, posting a 74.88% total return against 226.91%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SOXL has compounded at 47.41% a year, against 34.31% for SMH. SMH has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 37.0% against 118.4% for SOXL. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SMH vs SOXL — at a glance

Generated October 10, 2026.

Overview

SMH and SOXL both track semiconductor companies but use fundamentally different structures. SMH is a traditional, unleveraged index ETF holding the largest 25 U.S.-listed semiconductor firms, while SOXL is a 3x leveraged daily tracker designed to amplify semiconductor price moves in real time. The choice between them hinges on time horizon and risk tolerance, not merely on sector belief.

How they differ

The single biggest difference is leverage. That structural gap shows in their betas: SMH has a beta of 2.0, while SOXL's beta is 7.92—reflecting both sector sensitivity and the mathematical drag of daily rebalancing on leveraged products held longer than a day.

Expense ratios reflect the added complexity: SOXL charges 0.75%, more than double SMH's 0.35%. Distribution yields are minuscule for both (0.18% and 0.07%), so neither is income-focused.

Who each is best for

  • SMH: Fits investors seeking broad, buy-and-hold exposure to semiconductor leaders without amplified volatility. Works for portfolios where the semiconductor sector plays a core or satellite role over years or decades.
  • SOXL: Fits active traders or those making a high-conviction, short-term directional bet on semiconductor upside. Designed for tactical allocation windows measured in days or weeks, not strategic holding periods.

Key risks to know

  • Leverage decay in sideways or negative markets. SOXL rebalances daily to maintain its 3x target, which means extended flat or down periods erode NAV relative to unleveraged exposure. A semiconductor index that falls 5% one day and rises 5% the next does not return to its starting value; SOXL's leverage amplifies this friction cost.
  • Index overlap and single-sector concentration. Both funds concentrate in fewer than 30 semiconductor firms. SMH's top holdings and SOXL's underlying index are likely to overlap substantially, meaning both carry similar sector idiosyncratic risk—cyclicality, fab capacity swings, geopolitical supply-chain disruptions—with no diversification benefit between them.
  • Tracking error and daily reset mismatch. SOXL is designed for daily rebalancing. Holding it across multiple weeks or months means its cumulative return will diverge—often substantially—from 3 times the index return over that full period, even if the index is directionally correct. This is not a bug in SOXL's construction; it's a feature of how daily-reset leverage works, and it penalizes longer holding periods.
  • Volatility amplification and drawdown severity. SOXL's beta of 7.92 and 3x leverage mean that a 20% semiconductor decline translates into roughly a 60% SOXL decline. For investors without an exit plan or tight stop-losses, a single sharp selloff can inflict lasting damage to capital.

Bottom line

If you're building a core semiconductor position or want semiconductor exposure without active management, SMH's low fees and straightforward index tracking stand out. If you're making a near-term tactical bet on semiconductor strength and understand daily-reset mechanics, SOXL's leverage provides outsized exposure—but it's a timing tool, not a buy-and-hold vehicle. Past performance does not predict future results, and leverage magnifies both gains and losses in ways that can surprise longer-term holders.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.