DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SQQQ vs TQQQ: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ and ProShares UltraPro QQQ covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 13, 2026

Best for

  • SQQQInvestors who want higher current income (6.84% vs 0.92% for TQQQ).
  • TQQQInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSQQQTQQQ
Full nameProShares UltraPro Short QQQProShares UltraPro QQQ
IssuerProSharesProShares
Last Close$37.32 as of August 13, 2026$74.60 as of August 13, 2026
Distribution yield6.84%0.92%
Distribution Safety Scoreβ„’ β€”56
Expense ratio0.95%0.88%
AUM$1.69B$37.8B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Underlying indexNasdaq-100Nasdaq-100 Index
ObjectiveSeeks daily investment results that correspond to three times the inverse (-3x) of the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.Seek daily investment results, before fees, that correspond to three times the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date02/09/201002/09/2010
Beta-3.274.02
Last dividend$0.6380$0.1710
Ex-dividend date06/24/202606/24/2026

Bottom lineChoose SQQQ if you want higher current income (6.84% vs 0.92% for TQQQ). Choose TQQQ if you want broad equity exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Daily leverage reset. SQQQ and TQQQ target a multiple of the index's DAILY move, resetting every session. Over weeks and months the compounding of daily resets (volatility decay) can drag returns far below the stated multiple, especially in choppy markets β€” and losses are magnified the same way gains are.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs169
Total AUM$128B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

ProShares is known for offering leveraged and inverse ETFs that provide amplified exposure to market movements, along with thematic and income-focused strategies. Their fund lineup spans digital assets (including Bitcoin and Ethereum exposure through BITO and EETH), dividend strategies like the Dividend Aristocrats fund (NOBL), covered call income strategies, and leveraged/inverse products that track major indices with 2x or 3x daily multipliers (such as SSO and TQQQ for tech-heavy portfolios). With 23 ETFs across specialized families including leveraged products, money market funds, and sector-specific offerings, ProShares serves investors seeking both traditional income and alternative exposure strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SQQQ and TQQQ.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years β€” free to start, no credit card.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

SQQQ has lagged TQQQ over the trailing twelve months, posting a -55.02% total return against 64.39%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: TQQQ has compounded at 40.69% a year, against -54.94% for SQQQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince Feb 2010Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SQQQ-44.58%-55.02%-54.04%-46.02%-54.94%-46.10%62.7%-1.32-1.71-92.5%
TQQQ43.07%64.39%56.46%18.43%40.69%42.94%60.8%0.670.93-58.0%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 12, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. β€œSince Feb 2010” measures every fund from February 11, 2010 β€” the youngest fund's first trading day β€” so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) β€” higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window β€” shallower is better.

Quick verdict

SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SQQQ offers the higher yield at 6.84% vs 0.92% for TQQQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

TQQQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.88% compared to 0.95%.

They track different benchmarks: SQQQ is linked to Nasdaq-100 while TQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

TQQQ is the larger fund by assets ($37.8B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose SQQQ

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

  • Want higher current income β€” SQQQ yields 6.84% vs 0.92% for TQQQ.
  • Want broad equity exposure.
  • Prefer lower volatility β€” a beta of -3.3 vs 4.0 for TQQQ.

Choose TQQQ

ProShares UltraPro QQQ

  • Want broad equity exposure.
  • Want to keep costs low β€” a 0.88% expense ratio vs 0.95% for SQQQ.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SQQQ would generate roughly $57.00/month, while TQQQ would produce $7.67/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

SQQQ yield6.84%
TQQQ yield0.92%
Monthly diff on $10K$49.33

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SQQQ would cost approximately $950 in fees vs $880 for TQQQ (simplified, not compounded). The $70.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SQQQ ER0.95%
TQQQ ER0.88%

Strategy & risk

SQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 with a leverage approach, while TQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a leverage approach. Beta is -3.27 for SQQQ and 4.02 for TQQQ, indicating SQQQ is less volatile relative to the market.

SQQQ beta-3.27
TQQQ beta4.02

Fund details

SQQQ is managed by ProShares (launched 02/09/2010) with $1.69B in assets. TQQQ is managed by ProShares (launched 02/09/2010) with $37.8B in assets.

SQQQ AUM$1.69B
TQQQ AUM$37.8B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor β€” if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for SQQQ and TQQQ?

SQQQ currently distributes 6.84% and TQQQ 0.92%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is SQQQ or TQQQ better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SQQQ currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SQQQ and TQQQ?

SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) tracks Nasdaq-100 with a leverage approach, while TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a leverage approach. They are issued by ProShares and ProShares respectively.

Can I hold both SQQQ and TQQQ?

Yes β€” nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, SQQQ or TQQQ?

SQQQ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while TQQQ charges 0.88%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SQQQ vs TQQQ generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SQQQ would generate roughly $57.00 per month ($684.00 annually). The same in TQQQ would produce about $7.67 per month ($92.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SQQQ or TQQQ?

SQQQ has lagged TQQQ over the trailing twelve months, posting a -55.02% total return against 64.39%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: TQQQ has compounded at 40.69% a year, against -54.94% for SQQQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare SQQQ with

People also compare TQQQ with

Popular comparisons

SQQQ vs TQQQ β€” at a glance

Generated August 8, 2026.

Overview

SQQQ and TQQQ are both 3x leveraged ETFs tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, but they move in opposite directions. TQQQ amplifies upside β€” seeking three times the daily return of the index β€” while SQQQ amplifies downside, targeting three times the inverse daily return. Both are ProShares products with identical inception dates and expense ratios in the 0.88–0.95% range, but they serve fundamentally different trading strategies.

How they differ

The defining difference is direction: TQQQ gains when tech stocks rise and loses when they fall, with a beta of 3.96; SQQQ moves the opposite way, with a beta of -3.2, and profits from Nasdaq-100 declines.

TQQQ generates minimal income (0.92% distribution rate) because leveraged long equity strategies distribute little; SQQQ's 6.82% rate reflects its short positioning and the mechanics of inverse leverage. TQQQ has captured significantly more assets β€” $37.8B versus SQQQ's $1.69B β€” reflecting stronger demand for upside leverage over downside hedges.

Both funds use daily rebalancing to maintain their 3x multiplier, which creates tracking drift over longer holding periods and friction costs that accumulate during volatile market conditions. This is not a passive buy-and-hold tool.

Who each is best for

TQQQ: Fits traders and tactical allocators seeking concentrated exposure to Nasdaq-100 momentum during bull phases or within shorter time windows where daily rebalancing works in their favor, and who can tolerate the effects of daily compounding over multi-week or multi-month stretches.

SQQQ: Fits investors using short equity leverage as a portfolio hedge against Nasdaq-100 weakness, or traders taking tactical short positions on the index during periods they expect near-term downside pressure.

Key risks to know

  • Compounding decay over longer holding periods. Daily rebalancing means these funds decay relative to their underlying index during sideways or choppy markets. A Nasdaq-100 that moves up 10%, down 10%, and up 10% in three separate periods will not yield the same cumulative 3x return that TQQQ seeks β€” the math of daily rebalancing works against long holds in volatile markets.
  • Nasdaq-100 concentration risk. Both funds are fully exposed to 100 large-cap tech and growth stocks with heavy overlap in the mega-cap technology sector. Sector rotations, valuations, or regulatory headwinds affecting technology will impact both funds similarly and acutely.
  • SQQQ faces extended decay in rising markets. During prolonged bull runs β€” the Nasdaq-100's dominant regime over long periods β€” SQQQ loses value both from its inverse positioning and from the compounding math of -3x daily rebalancing. Holding SQQQ as a long-term position has historically eroded capital.
  • TQQQ faces leverage margin calls and forced liquidation risk in tail-down scenarios. During sharp market dislocations, the ETF's ability to maintain its 3x daily target may be constrained by broker lending conditions or extreme volatility, potentially forcing unwanted position reductions.

Bottom line

TQQQ and SQQQ are inverse bets on the same index, not complements to each other in a diversified portfolio. TQQQ amplifies gains during tech strength but compounds losses during downturns; SQQQ profits from declines but erodes in rising markets. Both are tools for tactical timing, not buy-and-hold holdings β€” daily rebalancing makes them expensive to hold across multiple market cycles regardless of direction.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings β€” forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.