DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

TSLY vs YMAX: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 2, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • TSLYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 53.75%, generated by selling options premium.
  • YMAXInvestors who are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

TSLY has lagged YMAX over the trailing twelve months, posting a -11.56% total return against -0.55%. Measured from Jan 2024 — the start of shared available history — YMAX has compounded at 14.89% a year versus 12.90% for TSLY. YMAX has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.9% against 38.3% for TSLY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Jan 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
TSLY-10.15%-11.56%12.90%38.3%-0.44-0.57-31.3%
YMAX7.91%-0.55%14.89%24.9%-0.20-0.28-26.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jan 2024” measures every fund from January 17, 2024 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Distribution rate, SEC yield and return of capital

MetricTSLYYMAX
Forward distribution rate53.75%40.78%
Trailing 12-month yield81.87%62.00%
30-day SEC yield3.17%87.45%
Return of capital100.00%26.49%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Total return against the stated underlying is on TSLY vs TSLA.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricTSLYYMAX
Full nameYieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETFYieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETF
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Underlying indexTesla (TSLA)Basket (Yieldmax ETFs)
Last Close$22.25 as of October 2, 2026$7.60 as of October 2, 2026
Distribution rate53.75%40.78%
Trailing 12-month yield81.87%62.00%
30-day SEC yield3.17%87.45%
Distribution Safety Score™ 7455
Safety-Adjusted Yield 39.77%22.43%
Expense ratio1.07%1.33%
AUM$691M$371M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
ObjectiveYieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF seeks current income while providing indirect exposure to the share price returns of Tesla, Inc. common stock, subject to a limit on potential investment gains. The fund does not invest directly in Tesla, Inc.; it uses a synthetic covered call strategy built from standardized exchange-traded options.Fund of funds that seeks weekly income by investing its assets across the shares of the underlying YieldMax option income ETFs, or directly in the instruments those ETFs hold.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date11/22/202201/16/2024
Beta1.481.5515
Last dividend$0.23 payable today$0.0596
Ex-dividend date10/01/202609/30/2026

Bottom lineChoose TSLY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 53.75%, generated by selling options premium. Choose YMAX if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout. TSLY and YMAX both use option or derivative overlays. Their tradeoff is the underlying exposure, how each option strategy is implemented, and the yield each targets; either overlay can limit upside participation, so neither offers uncapped price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. TSLY and YMAX generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs62
Total AUM$10.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on TSLY and YMAX.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

TSLY offers the higher yield at 53.75% vs 40.78% for YMAX. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

TSLY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 1.07% compared to 1.33%.

They have different reference exposures: TSLY is linked to Tesla (TSLA) while YMAX is linked to Basket (Yieldmax ETFs), which means their performance drivers differ.

TSLY is the larger fund by assets ($691M), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, TSLY would generate roughly $103.37 cash per distribution, while YMAX would produce $78.42 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

TSLY yield53.75%
YMAX yield40.78%
Cash diff on $10K$24.94

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, TSLY would cost approximately $1,070 in fees vs $1,330 for YMAX (simplified, not compounded). The $260.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

TSLY ER1.07%
YMAX ER1.33%

Strategy & risk

TSLY uses Tesla (TSLA) as its reference exposure with a covered call approach, while YMAX tracks Basket (Yieldmax ETFs) with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.48 for TSLY and 1.5515 for YMAX, making TSLY the less volatile of the two by this measure.

TSLY beta1.48
YMAX beta1.5515

Fund details

TSLY is managed by YieldMax (launched 11/22/2022) with $691M in assets. YMAX is managed by YieldMax (launched 01/16/2024) with $371M in assets.

TSLY AUM$691M
YMAX AUM$371M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for TSLY and YMAX?

TSLY currently distributes 53.75% and YMAX 40.78%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is TSLY or YMAX better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. TSLY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between TSLY and YMAX?

TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) uses Tesla (TSLA) as its reference exposure with a covered call approach, while YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETF) tracks Basket (Yieldmax ETFs) with a covered call approach. They are issued by YieldMax and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both TSLY and YMAX?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is TSLY or YMAX safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — TSLY scores 74, YMAX scores 55, so TSLY's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, TSLY or YMAX?

TSLY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while YMAX charges 1.33%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in TSLY vs YMAX generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in TSLY would generate roughly $103.37 cash per distribution ($5,375.00 annually). The same in YMAX would produce about $78.42 cash per distribution ($4,078.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, TSLY or YMAX?

TSLY has lagged YMAX over the trailing twelve months, posting a -11.56% total return against -0.55%. Measured from Jan 2024 — the start of shared available history — YMAX has compounded at 14.89% a year versus 12.90% for TSLY. YMAX has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.9% against 38.3% for TSLY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

TSLY vs YMAX — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Overview

TSLY and YMAX are both options-overlay ETFs from YieldMax that distribute weekly income through synthetic covered call strategies, but they differ fundamentally in scope and construction. TSLY targets Tesla directly via a single-stock covered call overlay, while YMAX is a fund-of-funds that holds multiple YieldMax option-income ETFs, diversifying across several underlying stocks. Both aim for high current income at the cost of capped upside exposure.

How they differ

TSLY's strategy is pure single-stock leverage: it synthetically replicates a covered call position on Tesla only, delivering 53.75% in annualized distributions. YMAX spreads that same covered-call approach across a basket of YieldMax ETFs, resulting in a lower distribution rate of 40.78% but broader exposure.

The second key difference is structural risk. TSLY's 1.48 beta means its Tesla-only leverage swings harder with the underlying stock; YMAX's 1.5515 beta is similarly elevated but distributed across multiple names, theoretically reducing single-name concentration risk.

Expense ratios diverge slightly: TSLY costs 1.07%, while YMAX's 1.33% reflects the embedded layer of holding other ETFs.

Who each is best for

TSLY: Investors comfortable with concentrated exposure to a single mega-cap stock and seeking maximum weekly income from a covered-call cap on that specific position. Fits an income-first mentality where Tesla conviction is high.

YMAX: Fits investors drawn to the covered-call income model but seeking a diversified basket across multiple YieldMax strategies, reducing reliance on any single underlying name while maintaining weekly payouts.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at 50%+ distribution yields. Both funds distribute far above typical equity returns; TSLY's 53.75% in particular suggests meaningful reliance on return-of-capital treatment and potential long-term NAV decline if the underlying stocks do not appreciate enough to offset total distributions.
  • Upside cap inherent in covered calls. Both strategies cap gains in exchange for income; during extended rallies in Tesla or the basket of underlying stocks, shareholders forgo appreciation above the strike level, realizing opportunity cost rather than absolute loss but a meaningful performance lag.
  • Single-stock concentration (TSLY) or multi-layer fund-of-funds drag (YMAX). TSLY's Tesla-only exposure concentrates idiosyncratic risk in one name. YMAX diversifies but layers fees and potential tracking inefficiency across multiple underlying YieldMax ETFs, reducing the net income relative to holding the single-stock version directly.
  • Options-market liquidity and rolling risk. Both rely on standardized exchange-traded options to implement their strategies; in periods of elevated volatility or illiquidity, option spreads widen and rolling positions becomes more costly, which can depress net distributions.
  • Recent inception and limited performance history. YMAX began in January 2024; TSLY's inception in late 2022 means both offer less than two full years of data to evaluate how distributions hold up across market cycles and whether NAV erosion accelerates in downturns.

Bottom line

If you want maximum income concentration in a single high-conviction name, TSLY's 53.75% yield and Tesla-only focus stands out; if you prefer the covered-call income model but with diversification across multiple underlying stocks, YMAX's basket approach may reduce single-name risk, though at a lower distribution rate and an extra layer of expenses. Both funds trade current income for capped upside and carry NAV erosion risk at these elevated payout rates—neither is a buy-and-hold wealth builder. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.