DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

VOO vs VOOY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and XFUNDS Large Cap Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 16, 2026

No track record yet. VOOY launched within the last six months. The forward distribution rate is left blank until a payout is published.

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

VOO has outpaced VOOY over the year to date, posting a 12.85% total return against 0.15%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulativeSince Sep 2026
VOO12.85%0.00%
VOOY0.15%0.15%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 16, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Sep 2026” measures every fund from September 2, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricVOOVOOY
Full nameVanguard S&P 500 ETFXFUNDS Large Cap Income ETF
IssuerVanguardNicholas Wealth Management
Underlying indexS&P 500 IndexU.S. Large-Cap Equities
Last Close$701.61 as of October 16, 2026$25.10 as of October 16, 2026
Distribution rate1.04%—
Trailing 12-month yield1.06%0.75%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9750
Safety-Adjusted Yield 1.01%—
Expense ratio0.03%0.75%
AUM$1.04T$2.52M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyMonthly
ObjectiveTrack the performance of the S&P 500 Index, representing 500 of the largest U.S. companies.Seeks capital appreciation as its primary objective and current income as its secondary objective by investing primarily in U.S. large-cap equities or ETFs and using options strategies to generate net premiums.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date09/07/201008/31/2026
Beta1.0—
Last dividend$1.8226$0.189
Ex-dividend date09/28/202610/06/2026

— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because VOOY launched August 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineWe won't call this one: VOOY launched August 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional. What is already clear from the numbers above: the two do not cost the same — VOO charges 0.03% against 0.75% for VOOY, and on funds tracking the same thing that gap compounds every year you hold.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4.66T

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VOO.

ETFs15
Total AUM$744M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Nicholas Wealth Management is known for offering specialized ETFs across digital assets, income generation, and thematic investing strategies. Their fund lineup spans emerging asset classes including cryptocurrency and blockchain exposure, traditional income-focused strategies, and sector-specific themes ranging from nuclear energy to nightlife, appealing to investors seeking both alternative investments and targeted sector exposure. The issuer maintains a focused but diversified portfolio of tickers that caters to both conventional income seekers and those pursuing niche, forward-looking investment themes.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VOOY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and VOOY (XFUNDS Large Cap Income ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

VOO currently shows a 1.04% distribution yield. VOOY has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

VOO is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.03% compared to 0.75%.

They have different reference exposures: VOO is linked to S&P 500 Index while VOOY is linked to U.S. Large-Cap Equities, which means their performance drivers differ.

VOO has $1.04T in assets vs $2.52M for VOOY, but VOOY only launched August 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, VOO would generate roughly $26.00 cash per distribution, while VOOY has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

VOO yield1.04%
VOOY yield—

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, VOO would cost approximately $30 in fees vs $750 for VOOY (simplified, not compounded). The $720.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

VOO ER0.03%
VOOY ER0.75%

Strategy & risk

VOO tracks S&P 500 Index with a large cap approach, while VOOY tracks U.S. Large-Cap Equities with an options approach.

VOO beta1.0
VOOY beta—

Fund details

VOO is managed by Vanguard (launched 09/07/2010) with $1.04T in assets. VOOY is managed by Nicholas Wealth Management (launched 08/31/2026) with $2.52M in assets.

VOO AUM$1.04T
VOOY AUM$2.52M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of VOO or VOOY pays more dividend income?

VOO currently reports a distribution yield, while VOOY has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between VOO and VOOY?

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index with a large cap approach, while VOOY (XFUNDS Large Cap Income ETF) tracks U.S. Large-Cap Equities with an options approach. They are issued by Vanguard and Nicholas Wealth Management respectively.

Can I hold both VOO and VOOY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is VOO or VOOY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — VOO scores 97, VOOY scores 50, so VOO's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, VOO or VOOY?

VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VOOY charges 0.75%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in VOO vs VOOY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in VOO would generate roughly $26.00 cash per distribution ($104.00 annually). VOOY has not established a distribution history yet, so a cash estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, VOO or VOOY?

VOO has outpaced VOOY over the year to date, posting a 12.85% total return against 0.15%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

VOO vs VOOY — at a glance

Generated October 17, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

VOO is a vanilla S&P 500 index tracker with $1045B in assets, designed to match the performance of the 500 largest U.S. companies with minimal friction. VOOY is a much smaller, newly launched options-overlay fund that targets the same large-cap universe but layers on systematic covered call writing to generate income, accepting tracking error and higher fees in pursuit of monthly payouts.

How they differ

The fundamental difference is strategy: VOO passively replicates an index, while VOOY actively sells call options against large-cap holdings to produce net income premiums. VOO has $1045B in assets and launched 16 years ago; VOOY has only $2.52M and is 16 years old.

Who each is best for

VOO: Investors building a core, low-cost equity allocation who prioritize tax efficiency, long-term capital appreciation, and minimal portfolio overhead; fits buy-and-hold strategies where simplicity and expense control matter most.

VOOY: Investors seeking monthly income from large-cap exposure who can tolerate options risk, potential call assignment, and the unknown long-term consequences of systematic premium-harvesting in a newly launched fund; suited to those trading potential appreciation for near-term cash flow.

Key risks to know

  • Options assignment and capital structure risk. Call options sold to fund payouts can be exercised, forcing VOOY to sell holdings at predetermined prices. Combined with the fund's tiny asset base ($2.52M), this creates both a capital management and a market-impact concern in sell-offs or sharp rallies.
  • NAV erosion at high or sustained distribution rates. VOOY's monthly payout cadence and options-income model may rely on return-of-capital or rapid erosion of net asset value if underlying equity returns disappoint. The fund is too new to reveal whether payouts have been sustained from realized gains or capital.
  • Tracking error from call-writing constraints. VOOY's 0.75% expense ratio combined with call-writing obligations means it will likely lag VOO in strong rallies, when calls cap upside. In flat or declining markets, the question is whether premium income offsets foregone capital gains.

Bottom line

If you want low-cost, transparent large-cap equity exposure with a 13-year track record and tax efficiency, VOO's 0.03% expense ratio and $1045B in scale offer an established structure. If you prioritize monthly income and can accept options risk, smaller asset base, and the unknowns of a newly launched strategy, VOOY offers that trade-off—but its lack of distribution-rate disclosure and minimal operating history make it a speculative bet. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.