ETF Comparison

XLE vs XLF: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 9, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

XLEInvestors who want higher current income (2.34% vs 1.52% for XLF).
XLFInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

XLE has outpaced XLF over the trailing twelve months, posting a 50.46% total return against 3.89%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — XLF has compounded at 12.81% a year, ahead of XLE at 10.44%. XLF has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 16.1% against 21.8% for XLE. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
Symbol	YTD cumulative	1Y cumulative	3Y annualized	5Y annualized	10Y annualized	Since Dec 1998	Volatility	Sharpe	Sortino	Max drawdown
XLE	45.38%	50.46%	17.32%	22.35%	10.44%	9.14%	21.8%	0.53	0.71	-20.1%
XLF	0.85%	3.89%	20.14%	8.85%	12.81%	5.91%	16.1%	0.86	1.22	-15.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 9, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Dec 1998” measures every fund from December 22, 1998 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
Metric	XLE	XLF
Full name	State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Issuer	State Street	State Street
Underlying index	Energy Select Sector Index	Financial Select Sector Index
Last Close	$65.08 as of October 9, 2026	$54.73 as of October 9, 2026
Distribution rate	2.34%	1.52%
Trailing 12-month yield	2.34%	1.51%
Distribution Safety Score™	92	95
Safety-Adjusted Yield	2.15%	1.44%
Expense ratio	0.08%	0.08%
AUM	$40.2B	$50.0B
Distribution frequency	Quarterly	Quarterly
Objective	Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.	Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset class	Equity	Equity
Inception date	12/16/1998	12/16/1998
Beta	-0.03	0.75
Last dividend	$0.38028	$0.197
Ex-dividend date	09/21/2026	09/21/2026

Bottom lineChoose XLE if you want higher current income (2.34% vs 1.52% for XLF). Choose XLF if you want broad equity exposure.

Model this comparison:

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

State Street

ETFs179

Total AUM$2144B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XLE and XLF.

See all State Street ETFs

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Quick verdict

XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

XLE offers the higher yield at 2.34% vs 1.52% for XLF. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

They have different reference exposures: XLE is linked to Energy Select Sector Index while XLF is linked to Financial Select Sector Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

XLF is the larger fund by assets ($50.0B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Still deciding? Track XLE & XLF for free

Create a free Dividend Vision account to keep them on a watchlist, get notified when they declare dividends, and see how much income they would add to your portfolio.

Add to my watchlist See what a free account includes

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, XLE would generate roughly $58.50 cash per distribution, while XLF would produce $38.00 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

XLE yield2.34%

XLF yield1.52%

Cash diff on $10K$20.50

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, XLE would cost approximately $80 in fees vs $80 for XLF (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.

XLE ER0.08%

XLF ER0.08%

Strategy & risk

XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index with an oil approach, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index with an index approach. Beta is -0.03 for XLE and 0.75 for XLF, making XLE the less volatile of the two by this measure.

XLE beta-0.03

XLF beta0.75

Fund details

XLE is managed by State Street (launched 12/16/1998) with $40.2B in assets. XLF is managed by State Street (launched 12/16/1998) with $50.0B in assets.

XLE AUM$40.2B

XLF AUM$50.0B

Ready to act?

Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for XLE and XLF?

XLE currently distributes 2.34% and XLF 1.52%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is XLE or XLF better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. XLE currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between XLE and XLF?

XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) tracks Energy Select Sector Index with an oil approach, while XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) tracks Financial Select Sector Index with an index approach. They are issued by State Street and State Street respectively.

Can I hold both XLE and XLF?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is XLE or XLF safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — XLF scores 95, XLE scores 92, so XLF's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. XLE has also shown lower price volatility (beta -0.03 vs 0.75 for XLF). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, XLE or XLF?

XLE and XLF both charge the same expense ratio of 0.08%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.

How much income does $10,000 in XLE vs XLF generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in XLE would generate roughly $58.50 cash per distribution ($234.00 annually). The same in XLF would produce about $38.00 cash per distribution ($152.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, XLE or XLF?

More comparisons to explore

People also compare XLE with

People also compare XLF with

Popular comparisons

Dividend dates and history

XLE vs XLF — at a glance

Generated October 10, 2026.

Overview

XLE and XLF are large-cap sector ETFs that track different S&P 500 Select Sector indexes—energy and financials respectively. Both charge 0.08% and distribute quarterly. The fundamental distinction is sector exposure: XLE captures oil, gas, and utilities companies; XLF holds banks, insurance, and real estate investment trusts. Their performance patterns diverge sharply because energy and financials respond differently to interest rates, commodity prices, and credit cycles.

How they differ

XLE's -0.03 beta indicates it moves opposite the broad market on average, whereas XLF's 0.75 beta moves with it—a structural difference driven by energy's commodity sensitivity versus financials' correlation to economic growth and rate cycles. XLE yields 2.34%, outpacing XLF's 1.52% by 0.82% percentage points, reflecting energy's capital-intensive model and capital returns to shareholders.

Who each is best for

XLE: Fits investors seeking commodity-linked equity exposure and higher current income, with some comfort holding a sector that historically carries inverse market correlation.

XLF: Designed for investors who want financials exposure aligned with economic cycles and interest-rate expectations, accepting lower yield in exchange for beta closer to the overall market.

Key risks to know

Sector concentration: XLE's energy focus ties returns to oil and gas prices and regulatory policy; a prolonged downturn in energy demand or a transition away from fossil fuels concentrates losses in a single economic lever.

Negative market correlation: XLE's -0.03 beta means it can underperform during broad market rallies, limiting total return potential in strongly positive years.

Rate sensitivity: XLF's largest holdings—banks and insurers—are sensitive to interest-rate levels and yield-curve shape; a flattening curve or rapid rate decline can compress net interest margins and reduce profitability.

Credit cycle exposure: Financials performance depends partly on credit quality and loan-loss provisions; deteriorating credit conditions can quickly weigh on valuations and payouts.

Overlapping holdings risk: Both funds hold companies across different sectors, but energy and financials holdings may have common counterparties or dependencies worth verifying before combining them in a portfolio.

Bottom line

If you want higher current income and don't mind sector concentration plus inverse market beta, XLE stands out. If you prefer a financial-sector play that moves more in line with broader market conditions, XLF's lower yield reflects its steadier correlation profile. Past performance does not predict future results; sector rotations and macroeconomic shifts can reverse these relative dynamics at any time.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

Start Free Open in Comparator Browse Screener

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.