ETF Comparison

XLE vs XLF: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated September 18, 2026

Best for

XLEInvestors who want higher current income (2.39% vs 1.34% for XLF).
XLFInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings.

XLE has outpaced XLF over the trailing twelve months, posting a 47.37% total return against 4.89%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — XLF has compounded at 13.24% a year, ahead of XLE at 10.92%. XLF has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 16.2% against 22.0% for XLE. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
Symbol	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y	10Y	Since Dec 1998	Volatility	Sharpe	Sortino	Max drawdown
XLE	42.81%	47.37%	15.12%	25.60%	10.92%	9.09%	22.0%	0.44	0.59	-20.1%
XLF	2.57%	4.89%	18.80%	10.14%	13.24%	5.99%	16.2%	0.79	1.11	-15.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 18, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since Dec 1998” measures every fund from December 22, 1998 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
Metric	XLE	XLF
Full name	State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Issuer	State Street	State Street
Underlying index	Energy Select Sector Index	Financial Select Sector Index
Last Close	$64.31 as of September 18, 2026	$55.86 as of September 18, 2026
Distribution rate	2.39%	1.34%
Distribution Safety Score™	92	95
Safety-Adjusted Yield	2.20%	1.27%
Expense ratio	0.08%	0.08%
AUM	$41.8B	$54.3B
Distribution frequency	Quarterly	Quarterly
Objective	Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.	Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset class	Equity	Equity
Inception date	12/16/1998	12/16/1998
Beta	-0.07	0.71
Last dividend	$0.3849	$0.187
Ex-dividend date	06/22/2026	06/22/2026

Bottom lineChoose XLE if you want higher current income (2.39% vs 1.34% for XLF). Choose XLF if you want broad equity exposure.

Model this comparison:

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

State Street

ETFs179

Total AUM$2092B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XLE and XLF.

See all State Street ETFs

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Quick verdict

XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

XLE offers the higher yield at 2.39% vs 1.34% for XLF. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

They have different reference exposures: XLE is linked to Energy Select Sector Index while XLF is linked to Financial Select Sector Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

XLF is the larger fund by assets ($54.3B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Still deciding? Track XLE & XLF for free

Create a free Dividend Vision account to keep them on a watchlist, get notified when they declare dividends, and see how much income they would add to your portfolio.

Add to my watchlist See what a free account includes

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, XLE would generate roughly $19.92/month, while XLF would produce $11.17/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

XLE yield2.39%

XLF yield1.34%

Monthly diff on $10K$8.75

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, XLE would cost approximately $80 in fees vs $80 for XLF (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.

XLE ER0.08%

XLF ER0.08%

Strategy & risk

XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index with an oil approach, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index with an index approach. Beta is -0.07 for XLE and 0.71 for XLF, making XLE the less volatile of the two by this measure.

XLE beta-0.07

XLF beta0.71

Fund details

XLE is managed by State Street (launched 12/16/1998) with $41.8B in assets. XLF is managed by State Street (launched 12/16/1998) with $54.3B in assets.

XLE AUM$41.8B

XLF AUM$54.3B

Ready to act?

Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for XLE and XLF?

XLE currently distributes 2.39% and XLF 1.34%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is XLE or XLF better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. XLE currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between XLE and XLF?

XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) tracks Energy Select Sector Index with an oil approach, while XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) tracks Financial Select Sector Index with an index approach. They are issued by State Street and State Street respectively.

Can I hold both XLE and XLF?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is XLE or XLF safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — XLF scores 95, XLE scores 92, so XLF's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. XLE has also shown lower price volatility (beta -0.07 vs 0.71 for XLF). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, XLE or XLF?

XLE and XLF both charge the same expense ratio of 0.08%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.

How much income does $10,000 in XLE vs XLF generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in XLE would generate roughly $19.92 per month ($239.00 annually). The same in XLF would produce about $11.17 per month ($134.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, XLE or XLF?

More comparisons to explore

People also compare XLE with

People also compare XLF with

Popular comparisons

XLE vs XLF — at a glance

Generated September 19, 2026.

Both are issued by State Street with identical expense ratios of 0.08% and 0.08%, making them low-cost core holdings for sector-specific exposure. The key distinction is their underlying sector orientation: XLE isolates energy companies (oil, gas, utilities integration), while XLF captures banks, insurance, and financial services across the S&P 500.

How they differ

XLE's $41.8B in assets under management exceeds XLF's $54.3B, yet XLF commands a larger share of capital, suggesting stronger institutional adoption in the financials space. XLE yields 2.39% versus XLF's 1.34%, reflecting energy's higher cash-generation profile and cyclicality relative to financials' lower but steadier dividend patterns. The most striking difference lies in their market sensitivity: XLE carries a beta of -0.07, indicating it moves opposite the broader market in some periods, while XLF's 0.71 beta suggests materially higher correlation with equities. Both distribute quarterly, but XLE's wider yield spread reflects its commodity-linked revenue streams and capital-intensive operations.

Who each is best for

XLE: Fits investors seeking energy sector exposure with a higher yield and comfortable with the cyclical volatility tied to oil and gas prices; those tilting a broad equity allocation toward energy commodities.

XLF: Designed for investors wanting financial services exposure with moderate dividend income and lower market-relative volatility; those building a diversified equity core that includes the banking and insurance industries.

Key risks to know

Sector concentration and cyclicality. Both funds concentrate risk in a single S&P 500 sector; XLE faces additional commodity-price sensitivity that can swing earnings sharply quarter to quarter, while XLF carries interest-rate risk tied to lending margins and credit conditions.

Inverse/low beta behavior in XLE. XLE's -0.07 beta signals that energy may underperform or move counter to broader market rallies, particularly in low-inflation or low-rate environments where growth stocks lead; this makes it a hedge rather than a traditional equity growth play.

Regulatory and transition risk in energy. XLE's holdings operate in an industry facing tightening emissions regulations and potential carbon pricing, which could pressure long-term profitability and capital allocation independent of oil prices.

Interest-rate sensitivity in XLF. Rising rates compress net interest margins for banks and lift discount rates on future insurance liabilities; falling rates have the opposite effect, creating a duration-like exposure not present in XLE.

Bottom line

If you seek high dividend income and are willing to tolerate commodity-linked volatility and inverse market behavior, XLE's 2.39% yield reflects energy's capital-intensive model. If you prioritize stability and lower market sensitivity while capturing financial services exposure, XLF's 1.34% yield and 0.71 beta profile align with that goal. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

Start Free Open in Comparator Browse Screener