Alternatives
Best MLPI Alternatives in 2026
Midstream and MLP ETFs to consider alongside the NEOS MLP High Income ETF.
Data updated September 2026 · 7 ETFs
Who this page is for
Best for
- MLPI holders comparing similar funds, fees, payouts, and strategy design
- Energy-income investors comparing an options overlay with conventional midstream funds
- Investors who will compare total return and NAV trend alongside distribution rate
Not a fit for
- Investors seeking broad energy-sector diversification beyond pipelines and midstream firms
- Anyone treating a current distribution rate as guaranteed future income
- Investors choosing from headline yield alone without reviewing the underlying exposure
Analysis
The MLP Alternatives category tracked here consists of seven exchange-traded funds built around midstream energy infrastructure and master limited partnerships, with ALPS, First Trust, Global X, Tortoise Capital, and Pacer as the primary issuers. Most funds in this group distribute quarterly, with USAI standing out as the lone monthly payer among the funds shown above.
- AMLP carries the largest AUM ($13.4B) and the highest yield (7.49%) among the funds shown above, but it also has the highest expense ratio (1.01%) in this group.
AI-generated analysis — AI can make mistakes. Verify important information independently. Not investment advice. AI risk disclosure
Risks specific to this category
- Strategy mismatch: several funds on this list track a different index or use a different income mechanism than MLPI, so swapping into one changes the exposure — upside participation, payout cadence, and tax character can all shift, not just the ticker.
- Concentration in one theme: most funds here focus on energy, so the whole list tends to draw down together when that corner of the market falls out of favor — diversification across the table is lower than the fund count suggests.
- Expense drag: expense ratios in this group average 0.67% — several times what broad index funds charge — and that cost compounds directly against total return.
- Distributions are not contractual: each payout is declared period by period, so the yields on this page can fall without notice when portfolio income, option premium, or fund policy changes.
- Methodology divergence: every fund here follows its own index rules or mandate, so two funds with similar headline yields can hold very different portfolios and diverge sharply in a drawdown — category membership is not interchangeability.
See this list inside your portfolio
A ranked list is a starting point. Dividend Vision turns it into a plan — forecasting the income your holdings actually generate and putting each fund's yield next to its total return and risk.
- Income forecasting — know what your holdings pay monthly, quarterly, and yearly
- Yield vs. total return — weigh each distribution against price performance, not the headline rate
- Screen & compare — line up any income ETFs side by side on yield, cost, and strategy
- Portfolio risk — see income concentration, issuer overlap, and volatility across your holdings
- AI ETF comparison — ask plain-language questions to compare yield, risk, and income potential
7 days of Pro included · no credit card · free plan afterward
How these alternatives are selected
- Universe: a hand-curated peer set, split into close peers (6 here — same core exposure and same income mechanism, so a like-for-like swap) and broader substitutes (a different index, underlying asset, or income mechanism). Every fund is labelled in the Strategy fit column; MLPI itself is excluded.
- Eligibility: active ETFs only — liquidated, delisted, and renamed funds drop out automatically. Leveraged and inverse products are never listed: a daily-reset 2x or -1x fund is not an alternative to a long income position.
- Ranking: assets under management, used only as a fund-size ranking. Never ranked by yield — yields are shown as data, not used to order the list.
- Fit: how each fund's strategy differs from MLPI — and who each one suits — is covered in the strategy notes and FAQ below.
Top picks
Top 3 MLPI alternatives by assets under management.
Yield distribution
Expense ratio distribution
Income projection
Estimated income if the current average distribution rate of 4.73% held for a full year with share prices unchanged. Distribution rate is not total return—a fund can pay a large distribution while its share price falls—so treat these as an upper-bound illustration, not a forecast.
| Investment | Annual income | Monthly income | Weekly income |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | $473 | $39 | $9 |
| $25,000 | $1,182 | $98 | $23 |
| $50,000 | $2,364 | $197 | $45 |
| $100,000 | $4,727 | $394 | $91 |
Issuer breakdown
Distribution of ETFs by fund issuer, showing how concentrated or varied the sponsor lineup is.
All 7 ETFs
| Ticker | Name | Strategy fit | Issuer | Yield | Expense ratio | AUM | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMLP | Alerian MLP ETF | Close peer | ALPS | 7.49% | 1.01% | $13.4B | Quarterly |
| EMLP | First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | Broader substitute | First Trust | 2.88% | 0.95% | $4.1B | Quarterly |
| MLPX | Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | Close peer | Global X | 4.09% | 0.45% | $3.6B | Quarterly |
| MLPA | Global X MLP ETF | Close peer | Global X | 7.22% | 0.77% | $2.4B | Quarterly |
| TPYP | Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | Close peer | Tortoise Capital | 3.30% | 0.40% | $872M | Quarterly |
| ENFR | Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | Close peer | ALPS | 3.95% | 0.35% | $531M | Quarterly |
| USAI | Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | Close peer | Pacer | 4.16% | 0.75% | $119M | Monthly |
Frequently asked questions
What are the best mlpi alternatives?
This page lists the top 7 ETFs in this category ranked by key metrics. The list includes funds from issuers like ALPS, First Trust, Global X, Tortoise Capital and more.
How often is this list updated?
The data on this page is refreshed regularly using the latest available distribution rates, expense ratios, and AUM figures. Last updated September 2026.
What is the average yield of these ETFs?
The average distribution yield across the 7 ETFs on this list is 4.73%. Individual yields range from 2.88% to 7.49%.
What is an Alerian energy infrastructure alternative to MLPI?
AMLP tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index and is the largest conventional MLP benchmark. MLPX and ENFR broaden into midstream corporates. None of those funds uses MLPI's option-income overlay, so they keep more of a midstream rally and usually pay less current cash.
What is the closest alternative to MLPI?
AMLP is the largest familiar MLP benchmark, while MLPX and ENFR offer broader midstream exposure. They do not use MLPI's same option-income design.
What should I compare when choosing a MLPI alternative?
Compare MLP versus C-corporation exposure, fund-level tax treatment, K-1 policy, option coverage, fees, concentration, distribution composition, and total return.
Explore more
Learn the method
The metrics and risks behind this list, explained in the Academy.
From the blog
Put this list to work in your portfolio
Import or build a portfolio to see income forecasts, upcoming distributions, income concentration, and risk across everything you own — and where a fund's yield and total return diverge.
7 days of Pro included · no credit card · free plan afterward


