AIHY
Not rated
No published distribution safety rating is available.
ETF Comparison
AIHY vs GRID vs NLR: Which Fits Each Goal in 2026?
A side-by-side comparison of Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF, First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated November 6, 2026
No track record yet. AIHY launched within the last six months. The forward distribution rate is left blank until a payout is published.
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Price and total return
Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.
Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.
Distribution Safety Score
An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.
GRID
Safe
High confidence
NLR
Generally safe
Limited data
Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric |  AIHY |  GRID |  NLR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full name | Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF | First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF |
| Issuer | Defiance ETFs | First Trust | VanEck |
| Underlying index | — | Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| Last Close | $20.46 as of November 6, 2026 | $154.21 as of November 6, 2026 | $88.44 as of November 6, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | — | 0.92% | 3.58% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | 1.00% | 3.58% |
| 30-day SEC yield | 1.31% | — | — |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | — | 83 | 61 |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | — | 0.76% | 2.18% |
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.56% | 0.52% |
| AUM | $16.5M | $11.3B | $3.01B |
| Distribution frequency | Annual | Quarterly | Annual |
| Objective | Seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in the companies building and operating the compute backbone of artificial intelligence — spanning AI compute infrastructure, cloud platforms, data centers, semiconductors, and AI software. Holdings must derive at least 50% of revenues, assets, or spending from AI and demonstrate revenue growing faster than operating expenses. | Seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield of the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. | Seeks to replicate the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | 07/20/2026 | 11/16/2009 | 08/13/2007 |
| Beta | — | 1.42 | 1.54 |
| Last dividend | — | $0.353 | $3.17 |
| Ex-dividend date | — | 09/24/2026 | 12/22/2025 |
— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because AIHY launched July 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.
Total returns
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
AIHY tops the group over the year to date with a 1.66% total return, against GRID at 0.00% and NLR at -31.80%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | Since Jul 2026 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIHY | 1.66% | 1.66% | 28.8% | 0.05 | 0.07 | -13.0% |
| GRID | 0.00% | -15.45% | 28.7% | -2.08 | -2.53 | -19.5% |
| NLR | -31.80% | -22.34% | 40.4% | -2.18 | -2.85 | -32.2% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jul 2026” measures every fund from July 21, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Jul 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Jul 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Distribution rate and SEC yield
| Metric | AIHY | GRID | NLR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward distribution rate | — | 0.92% | 3.58% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | 1.00% | 3.58% |
| 30-day SEC yield | 1.31% | — | — |
Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
ETFs91
Total AUM$9.47B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Defiance ETFs is known for offering specialized and thematic investment strategies that cater to niche market segments and alternative income approaches. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused funds, leveraged strategies, combinations of leverage with income generation, and thematic products tied to emerging trends and sectors. Defiance emphasizes non-traditional and differentiated strategies rather than broad-based index exposure, appealing to investors seeking targeted exposure beyond conventional ETF offerings.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AIHY.
ETFs329
Total AUM$290B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
First Trust is known for offering a diverse lineup of actively and passively managed ETFs across multiple investment styles and asset classes. Their fund families span income-focused strategies including dividend and covered call approaches, as well as thematic, factor-based, alternatives, and sector-specific offerings that appeal to different investor objectives. The issuer provides breadth across allocation, bond, buffer, commodities, and municipal fund categories, making them a comprehensive provider serving various portfolio construction and income-generation needs.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on GRID.
ETFs86
Total AUM$156B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
VanEck is known for offering specialized and thematic ETFs across a broad range of asset classes, from traditional equities and fixed income to alternatives and digital assets. The firm's lineup encompasses income-focused funds, sector strategies, commodity exposure, municipal bonds, and innovative thematic products covering areas like blockchain, artificial intelligence, and emerging markets. VanEck serves both income-oriented and growth-focused investors with a diversified product suite that extends beyond conventional equity and bond offerings.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on NLR.
Quick verdict
AIHY (Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF), GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund), NLR (VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF) are ETFs that take different approaches.
NLR offers the highest reported yield at 3.58%, followed by GRID at 0.92%.
AIHY is the cheapest with an expense ratio of 0.37%, compared to 0.52% for NLR and 0.56% for GRID.
GRID has the most assets at $11.3B, but AIHY only launched recently — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as they build a track record.
Top-holdings overlap
Positions that appear in every fund's top 10. Issuers disclose only the largest weights, so this captures the overlap of the concentrated end of each book — not the full portfolios.
— shared positions
AIHY top-10 holdings unavailable
GRID 0.0% of its top-10 weight
NLR 0.0% of its top-10 weight
Top-10 holdings unavailable for AIHY — cannot compute overlap.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment at current distribution rates, AIHY has no reported yield yet; GRID would pay about $92.00 a year (about $23.00 per quarterly distribution); NLR would pay about $358.00 a year.
AIHY yield—
GRID yield0.92%
NLR yield3.58%
Cost & efficiency
Over 10 years on $10,000: AIHY costs ~$370, GRID costs ~$560, NLR costs ~$520 in fees (simplified, not compounded).
AIHY ER0.37%
GRID ER0.56%
NLR ER0.52%
Strategy & risk
AIHY is an ETF built around technology exposure; GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index with an electrification approach; NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index with a nuclear approach.
AIHY beta—
GRID beta1.42
NLR beta1.54
Fund details
AIHY is managed by Defiance ETFs (launched 07/20/2026) with $16.5M in assets. GRID is managed by First Trust (launched 11/16/2009) with $11.3B in assets. NLR is managed by VanEck (launched 08/13/2007) with $3.01B in assets.
AIHY AUM$16.5M
GRID AUM$11.3B
NLR AUM$3.01B
Frequently asked questions
Which of AIHY, GRID, NLR is best for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. NLR currently offers the highest reported distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility, and funds without an established distribution history have no comparable yield to evaluate. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
What is the difference between AIHY, GRID, NLR?
AIHY (Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF) is an ETF built around technology exposure, issued by Defiance ETFs. GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index with an electrification approach, issued by First Trust. NLR (VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF) tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index with a nuclear approach, issued by VanEck.
Can I hold AIHY, GRID, NLR together?
Yes — nothing prevents holding them together. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
Which of AIHY, GRID and NLR is safest?
By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — GRID scores 83, NLR scores 61, so GRID's payout currently looks the more resilient of the group. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.
Which has the lowest fees among AIHY, GRID, NLR?
AIHY has an expense ratio of 0.37%, GRID has an expense ratio of 0.56%, NLR has an expense ratio of 0.52%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.
How much income does $10,000 generate in each?
At current distribution rates, $10,000 in AIHY has no reported cash yet. $10,000 in GRID would pay about $92.00 a year (about $23.00 per quarterly distribution). $10,000 in NLR would pay about $358.00 a year.
More comparisons to explore
People also compare AIHY with
People also compare GRID with
Popular comparisons
AIHY vs GRID vs NLR — at a glance
Generated November 1, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
Overview
AIHY, GRID, and NLR are three thematic equity ETFs betting on different technology and infrastructure transitions. AIHY focuses narrowly on AI compute and supporting infrastructure—semiconductors, data centers, and cloud platforms—and is newly launched with a revenue-growth filter. GRID tracks smart grid electrification and power infrastructure across utilities and industrials. NLR targets nuclear and uranium energy companies. All three are index-tracking or rules-based equity plays, but they operate in distinctly different market segments with different risk profiles.
How they differ
The sharpest distinction is asset class and underlying exposure.
Second, fund maturity and asset base differ dramatically. GRID has $11.3B in assets and 16 years years of history; NLR has $3.01B and 19 years years; AIHY has only $16.5M, having launched 07/20/2026. The size gap creates very different liquidity profiles and cost structures.
Third, yield and frequency diverge. Expense ratios cluster between 0.37% and 0.56%. GRID and NLR both report betas above 1.0—1.42 and 1.54, respectively—indicating sensitivity to broad market moves.
Who each is best for
AIHY: Fits growth-focused investors with a strong conviction in AI compute cycles and tolerance for early-stage, illiquid fund structures. The revenue-growth filter appeals to those who want AI exposure beyond mega-cap chip and cloud names, but the small AUM and recent inception carry concentration risk.
GRID: Designed for investors seeking broad exposure to electrification and grid modernization infrastructure across established utilities and industrials. The quarterly dividend and thematic infrastructure focus suit income-oriented allocators with moderate risk tolerance who view grid transition as durable secular demand.
NLR: Fits investors targeting nuclear energy and uranium commodity upside with a longer fund history. The 3.58% yield and established track record appeal to those who want nuclear energy exposure bundled with a measurable income stream, though commodity price swings create volatility.
- GRID regulatory and utility sector risk. Smart grid transition depends on regulatory support and capex cycles. Utility stocks carry interest-rate sensitivity; a sharp rise in rates could pressure valuations and reduce earnings growth in the infrastructure buildout.
- NLR commodity and geopolitical risk. Uranium and nuclear operators are exposed to uranium spot prices, nuclear fuel cycles, and geopolitical shocks. Mine disruptions, stockpile releases, or policy shifts can create large price swings independent of broader equity trends.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.