ARKX
Not rated
No published distribution safety rating is available.
ETF Comparison
ARKX vs UFO: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF and Procure Space ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated November 6, 2026
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Best for
- ARKXInvestors who want targeted space-industry exposure and accept its concentration.
- UFOInvestors who want higher current income (0.39% paid over the past 12 months while ARKX makes no distribution).
Price and total return
Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.
Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.
Distribution Safety Score
An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.
UFO
Caution
Limited data
Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric |  ARKX |  UFO |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | Procure Space ETF |
| Issuer | ARK Invest | Procure |
| Last Close | $28.42 as of November 6, 2026 | $39.01 as of November 6, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | — | 0.04% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | 0.39% |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | — | 40 |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | — | 0.02% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| AUM | $686M | $457M |
| Distribution frequency | None | Quarterly |
| Underlying index | Actively managed (no tracked index recorded) | S-Network Space Index |
| Objective | Actively managed ETF focused on space exploration and innovation companies. | Tracks the S-Network Space Index, providing exposure to companies that derive significant revenue from space-related business activities. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | 03/30/2021 | 04/10/2019 |
| Beta | 1.73 | 1.87 |
| Last dividend | — | $0.004 |
| Ex-dividend date | — | 09/29/2026 |
Total returns
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
ARKX has lagged UFO over the trailing twelve months, posting a -9.06% total return against 4.06%. The picture flips over 5 years, though — ARKX has compounded at 5.27% a year, ahead of UFO at 5.25%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | 1Y cumulative | 3Y annualized | 5Y annualized | Since Mar 2021 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARKX | -6.68% | -9.06% | 26.13% | 5.27% | 5.25% | 29.7% | 0.65 | 0.95 | -28.3% |
| UFO | -3.60% | 4.06% | 32.35% | 5.25% | 6.61% | 34.4% | 0.70 | 1.05 | -45.0% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Mar 2021” measures every fund from March 30, 2021 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Not a distribution payer
ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) has no distribution rate on file and its distribution frequency is None. ARKX is not a payer. The blank yield is not a zero yield.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Bottom lineChoose ARKX if you want targeted space-industry exposure and accept its concentration. Choose UFO if you want higher current income (0.39% paid over the past 12 months while ARKX makes no distribution).
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
ETFs14
Total AUM$15.5B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
ARK Invest is known for actively managed ETFs focused on disruptive innovation and emerging technologies across digital assets and innovation themes. ARK's funds are characterized by concentrated portfolios of high-conviction stock picks and a research-driven approach to identifying companies positioned to benefit from technological transformation.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ARKX.
ETFs1
Total AUM$457M
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Procure is known for offering thematic ETFs that target specific investment trends and sectors. This niche approach allows investors seeking targeted exposure to particular market themes rather than broad-based diversification.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on UFO.
Quick verdict
ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.
UFO has paid a 0.39% yield over the past 12 months. ARKX has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.
ARKX is the larger fund by assets ($686M), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.
Top-holdings overlap
Positions that appear in every fund's top 10. Issuers disclose only the largest weights, so this captures the overlap of the concentrated end of each book — not the full portfolios.
3 shared positions
ARKX 20.1% of its top-10 weight
UFO 24.2% of its top-10 weight
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment at the rates paid over the past 12 months, ARKX has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, while UFO would pay about $39.00 a year (about $9.75 per quarterly distribution on average).
ARKX yield—
UFO 12-month yield0.39%
Cost & efficiency
Over 10 years on $10,000, ARKX would cost approximately $750 in fees vs $750 for UFO (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.
ARKX ER0.75%
UFO ER0.75%
Strategy & risk
ARKX is an actively managed ETF, while UFO tracks S-Network Space Index. Beta is 1.73 for ARKX and 1.87 for UFO, making ARKX the less sensitive to market moves of the two by this measure.
ARKX beta1.73
UFO beta1.87
Fund details
ARKX is managed by ARK Invest (launched 03/30/2021) with $686M in assets. UFO is managed by Procure (launched 04/10/2019) with $457M in assets.
ARKX AUM$686M
UFO AUM$457M
Frequently asked questions
Which of ARKX or UFO pays more dividend income?
UFO currently reports a distribution yield, while ARKX has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.
What is the difference between ARKX and UFO?
ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) is an actively managed ETF, while UFO (Procure Space ETF) tracks S-Network Space Index. They are issued by ARK Invest and Procure respectively.
Can I hold both ARKX and UFO?
Yes. Their disclosed top-10 holdings share only 3 positions, so combining both adds mostly distinct underlying names — see the holdings-overlap section above. Overlap outside the disclosed top 10 can still exist.
Which has lower fees, ARKX or UFO?
ARKX and UFO both charge the same expense ratio of 0.75%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.
How much income does $10,000 in ARKX vs UFO generate?
At the rates paid over the past 12 months, ARKX does not pay distributions, so there is no cash income to estimate. $10,000 in UFO would pay about $39.00 a year (about $9.75 per quarterly distribution on average).
Which has performed better historically, ARKX or UFO?
ARKX has lagged UFO over the trailing twelve months, posting a -9.06% total return against 4.06%. The picture flips over 5 years, though — ARKX has compounded at 5.27% a year, ahead of UFO at 5.25%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More comparisons to explore
People also compare ARKX with
People also compare UFO with
Popular comparisons
ARKX vs UFO — at a glance
Generated November 1, 2026.
Overview
ARKX and UFO are both space-sector equity ETFs with identical 0.75% expense ratios, but they employ fundamentally different strategies. The key distinction is manager discretion versus index discipline.
How they differ
ARKX relies on ARK's portfolio managers to select space-focused companies, whereas UFO follows a rules-based index that defines space-revenue exposure upfront. Both charge 0.75%, so the cost differential is zero—the tradeoff is active oversight versus transparent index methodology. UFO has 1.87 beta versus ARKX's 1.73, suggesting UFO's index holdings exhibit slightly greater sensitivity to broad market moves. On asset base, ARKX holds $686M compared to UFO's $457M, making ARKX the larger fund.
Who each is best for
- ARKX: Fits investors who believe ARK's research team can identify outperforming space companies and are comfortable with active management's higher turnover and concentration risk in pursuit of alpha.
- UFO: Designed for investors who prefer transparent, consistent exposure to the space sector via index rules and do not need distribution income; suits those skeptical of active management's ability to justify its cost through stock selection.
Key risks to know
- Concentration in nascent sector: Both funds focus on space-related revenue, a still-developing industry with limited proven business models. Companies in this space may face regulatory delays, failed launches, or unproven commercial viability, creating sector-level volatility beyond general market risk.
- Active management concentration risk (ARKX): ARK's active picks concentrate the portfolio in managers' highest-conviction names, potentially magnifying loss if thesis on key holdings deteriorates.
- Index definition risk (UFO): UFO's returns depend on how the S-Network Space Index defines "space-related revenue," a threshold that could shift with methodology reviews or evolve in ways that exclude rising competitors.
Bottom line
If you want active stock-picking in space, ARKX's manager-led approach offers discretion; if you prefer a transparent index framework with no distribution complications, UFO provides that structure at the same cost. Both carry outsized beta and sector concentration risk—space exploration remains unproven as a durable return engine. Past performance does not predict future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.