ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ROKT.
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Procure is known for offering thematic ETFs that target specific investment trends and sectors. The firm currently operates a focused lineup of one fund, the UFO ETF, which concentrates on a specialized thematic strategy. This niche approach allows investors seeking targeted exposure to particular market themes rather than broad-based diversification.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on UFO.
Tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, providing exposure to companies driving innovation in deep space and deep sea frontiers.
Tracks the S-Network Space Index, providing exposure to companies that derive significant revenue from space-related business activities.
Asset class
Equity
Equity
Inception date
10/19/2018
04/10/2019
Beta
1.43
1.86
Last dividend
$0.0480
$0.0580
Ex-dividend date
09/21/2026
06/29/2026
Bottom lineROKT and UFO are nearly interchangeable — both offer very similar exposure with very similar cost and risk. The clearest tie-breaker is cost: ROKT is cheaper at 0.45% vs 0.75%.
Most used
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
Want to go deeper?
Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Total returns
ROKT has outpaced UFO over the trailing twelve months, posting a 66.92% total return against 43.05%. The lead holds up over 5 years too: ROKT has compounded at 22.77% a year, against 9.83% for UFO. ROKT has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 25.0% against 33.8% for UFO. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 23, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Apr 2019” measures every fund from April 11, 2019 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Quick verdict
ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.
UFO offers the higher yield at 0.53% vs 0.17% for ROKT. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.
ROKT is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.45% compared to 0.75%.
They track different benchmarks: ROKT is linked to S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index while UFO tracks S-Network Space Index, which means their performance drivers differ.
UFO is the larger fund by assets ($629M), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.
Still deciding? Track ROKT & UFO for free
Create a free Dividend Vision account to keep them on a watchlist, get notified when they declare dividends, and see how much income they would add to your portfolio.
On a $10,000 investment, ROKT would generate roughly $1.42/month, while UFO would produce $4.42/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.
ROKT yield0.17%
UFO yield0.53%
Monthly diff on $10K$3.00
Cost & efficiency
Over 10 years on $10,000, ROKT would cost approximately $450 in fees vs $750 for UFO (simplified, not compounded). The $300.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.
ROKT ER0.45%
UFO ER0.75%
Strategy & risk
ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while UFO tracks S-Network Space Index. Beta is 1.43 for ROKT and 1.86 for UFO, indicating ROKT is less volatile relative to the market.
ROKT beta1.43
UFO beta1.86
Fund details
ROKT is managed by State Street (launched 10/19/2018) with $222M in assets. UFO is managed by Procure (launched 04/10/2019) with $629M in assets.
Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.
Frequently asked questions
Is ROKT or UFO better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. UFO currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
What is the difference between ROKT and UFO?
ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while UFO (Procure Space ETF) tracks S-Network Space Index. They are issued by State Street and Procure respectively.
Can I hold both ROKT and UFO?
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
Which has lower fees, ROKT or UFO?
ROKT has an expense ratio of 0.45% while UFO charges 0.75%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.
How much income does $10,000 in ROKT vs UFO generate?
At current rates, $10,000 in ROKT would generate roughly $1.42 per month ($17.00 annually). The same in UFO would produce about $4.42 per month ($53.00 annually).
Which has performed better historically, ROKT or UFO?
ROKT has outpaced UFO over the trailing twelve months, posting a 66.92% total return against 43.05%. The lead holds up over 5 years too: ROKT has compounded at 22.77% a year, against 9.83% for UFO. ROKT has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 25.0% against 33.8% for UFO. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore related screeners
Lateral filters that include these funds — browse the full peer set on DividendVision.
Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio
See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.
