DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BITO vs MSTY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF and YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated May 20, 2026

ETFs20
Total AUM$92.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

ProShares is known for offering specialized ETFs that blend traditional investment themes with alternative asset classes, particularly digital assets and dividend strategies. Their lineup of eight funds focuses on income generation through dividend aristocrats and covered call strategies, alongside exposure to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. The issuer serves investors seeking both traditional dividend income (NOBL, ISPY, ITWO) and exposure to emerging digital asset markets (BITO, BITU, EETH), positioning itself in the niche intersection of conventional dividend investing and cryptocurrency-linked products.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BITO.

ETFs62
Total AUM$9.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax specializes in options-based and income-focused ETFs, leveraging covered call and short option strategies to generate high distribution yields for investors seeking regular income. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 61 ETFs organized across nine fund families, including prominent strategies like 0DTE (zero days-to-expiration) options, covered calls, and target distribution approaches, alongside more traditional performance and portfolio-based offerings. YieldMax's holdings span major technology and financial names—including tickers like AMZY, APLY, BRKC, and FBY—and the firm targets both individual investors and those seeking enhanced yield through systematic options strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MSTY.

Side-by-side snapshot

BITOMSTY
Full nameProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETFYieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerProSharesYieldMax
Last Close$10.49 as of May 20, 2026$23.81 as of May 20, 2026
Distribution yield1.37%115.42%
Expense ratio0.95%1.03%
AUM$1.9B$1.2B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyWeekly
Underlying indexBitcoin FuturesStrategy (MSTR)
ObjectiveFutures-BasedCovered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/18/202107/18/2023
Last dividend$0.02$0.54
Ex-dividend date05/01/202605/14/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

MSTY offers the higher yield at 115.42% vs 1.37% for BITO. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

BITO is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.95% compared to 1.03%.

They track different benchmarks: BITO is linked to Bitcoin Futures while MSTY tracks Strategy (MSTR), which means their performance drivers differ.

BITO is the larger fund by assets ($1.9B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BITO would generate roughly $11.42/month, while MSTY would produce $961.83/month, at current distribution rates.

BITO yield1.37%
MSTY yield115.42%
Monthly diff on $10K$950.42

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BITO would cost approximately $950 in fees vs $1,030 for MSTY (simplified, not compounded). The $80.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BITO ER0.95%
MSTY ER1.03%

Strategy & risk

BITO tracks Bitcoin Futures with a futures-based approach, while MSTY tracks Strategy (MSTR) using a covered call strategy.

Fund details

BITO is managed by ProShares (launched 10/18/2021) with $1.9B in assets. MSTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 07/18/2023) with $1.2B in assets.

BITO AUM$1.9B
MSTY AUM$1.2B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is BITO or MSTY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. MSTY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BITO and MSTY?

BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) tracks Bitcoin Futures with a futures-based strategy, while MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Strategy (MSTR) with a covered call approach. They are issued by ProShares and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both BITO and MSTY?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, BITO or MSTY?

BITO has an expense ratio of 0.95% while MSTY charges 1.03%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BITO vs MSTY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BITO would generate roughly $11.42 per month ($137.00 annually). The same in MSTY would produce about $961.83 per month ($11,542.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

BITO vs MSTY — at a glance

Generated April 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

BITO and MSTY are both derivative-overlay ETFs that generate income through options strategies rather than traditional dividends. BITO tracks Bitcoin futures and distributes monthly; MSTY sells call options against Microstrategy stock (MSTR) and pays weekly. Both charge under 1.1% in expenses, but they target entirely different underlying assets and employ different income mechanics—one through index futures, the other through single-stock covered calls.

How they differ

The core difference is exposure: BITO gives you Bitcoin futures price movement, while MSTY gives you MSTR equity exposure with upside capped by call-selling. BITO's 84.6% distribution rate and negative SEC yield signal that distributions heavily rely on return of capital, likely funded by underlying gains or NAV drawdown. MSTY's 70.5% distribution rate and weekly cadence reflect more frequent call-premium harvesting; its $22.83 price and narrower 52-week range ($19–$126) suggest lower volatility than BITO's $8.61–$23.63 swing. BITO's $1.74 billion AUM dwarfs MSTY's $1.05 billion, and BITO's inception in 2021 gives it longer history than MSTY's July 2023 launch. Both have zero reported beta, reflecting their derivative-focused structure rather than broad market correlation.

Who each is best for

BITO: Investors with high risk tolerance seeking Bitcoin price exposure who are willing to hold the position through significant price swings and understand that monthly distributions are partly funded by NAV decline rather than investment returns.

MSTY: Investors comfortable with single-stock concentration who view Microstrategy as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy and want weekly income; best suited for taxable accounts where frequent distributions may trigger short-term gains, or for investors monitoring MSTR's fundamentals closely.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion from distribution excess: BITO's -0.50% SEC yield alongside 84.6% distributions signals potential NAV decline. Over time, if Bitcoin futures returns don't match distribution payouts, the fund may need to return capital.
  • Single-stock concentration (MSTY only): MSTY holds only MSTR, meaning performance depends entirely on one company's execution and leverage strategy. MSTR's 52-week range of $19–$126 underscores extreme volatility.
  • Upside cap (MSTY only): Weekly call selling caps MSTY gains; strong MSTR rallies will be partially offset by call assignment or short calls reducing returns.
  • Futures rollover and basis risk (BITO only): Bitcoin futures prices can diverge from spot prices, and BITO must constantly roll expiring contracts—a drag during contango markets.
  • Derivative complexity and volatility: Both funds are non-traditional. Rapid option repricing and futures settlement can create gaps between NAV and market price, especially in volatile crypto environments.

Bottom line

If you want direct Bitcoin exposure through a regulated fund structure, BITO's larger size and established history offer familiarity—but expect monthly distributions that partially return capital if Bitcoin futures don't deliver gains. If you're betting on Microstrategy's business and want aggressive weekly income, MSTY's covered-call approach delivers higher frequency payouts at the cost of concentration risk and capped upside. Neither fund generates income from traditional business cash flow; both depend on option premiums and price appreciation to sustain distributions. Past performance doesn't predict future results, and both funds' yields depend heavily on continued Bitcoin and MSTR volatility.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.