DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BITO vs MSTY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF and YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 21, 2026

ETFs165
Total AUM$120B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

ProShares is known for offering leveraged and inverse ETFs that provide amplified exposure to market movements, along with thematic and income-focused strategies. Their fund lineup spans digital assets (including Bitcoin and Ethereum exposure through BITO and EETH), dividend strategies like the Dividend Aristocrats fund (NOBL), covered call income strategies, and leveraged/inverse products that track major indices with 2x or 3x daily multipliers (such as SSO and TQQQ for tech-heavy portfolios). With 23 ETFs across specialized families including leveraged products, money market funds, and sector-specific offerings, ProShares serves investors seeking both traditional income and alternative exposure strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BITO.

ETFs59
Total AUM$9.28B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MSTY.

Side-by-side snapshot

BITOMSTY
Full nameProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETFYieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerProSharesYieldMax
Last Close$8.82 as of July 21, 2026$13.12 as of July 21, 2026
Distribution yield1.41%82.04%
Distribution Safety Score™ 3724
Expense ratio0.95%0.99%
AUM$1.40B$765M
Distribution frequencyMonthlyWeekly
Underlying indexBitcoin FuturesStrategy (MSTR)
ObjectiveFutures-BasedCovered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/18/202102/21/2024
Beta1.87782.5604
Last dividend$0.0104$0.2070
Ex-dividend date07/01/202607/16/2026

Bottom lineChoose BITO if you want straightforward Bitcoin exposure for the long run. Choose MSTY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 82.04%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: MSTY's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while BITO keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BITO has outpaced MSTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -46.36% total return against -73.30%. Measured from Feb 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — MSTY has compounded at 4.40% a year versus 3.84% for BITO. BITO has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 44.4% against 64.9% for MSTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Feb 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BITO-28.75%-46.36%3.84%44.4%-1.51-1.97-54.5%
MSTY-37.38%-73.30%4.40%64.9%-2.12-2.73-76.6%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 20, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Feb 2024” measures every fund from February 22, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

MSTY offers the higher yield at 82.04% vs 1.41% for BITO. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

BITO is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.95% compared to 0.99%.

They track different benchmarks: BITO is linked to Bitcoin Futures while MSTY tracks Strategy (MSTR), which means their performance drivers differ.

BITO is the larger fund by assets ($1.40B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose BITO

ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF

  • Want straightforward Bitcoin exposure for long-term appreciation, not income.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.95% expense ratio vs 0.99% for MSTY.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 1.9 vs 2.6 for MSTY.

Choose MSTY

YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — MSTY distributes roughly 82.04% from selling options premium, vs 1.41% for BITO.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BITO would generate roughly $11.75/month, while MSTY would produce $683.67/month, at current distribution rates.

BITO yield1.41%
MSTY yield82.04%
Monthly diff on $10K$671.92

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BITO would cost approximately $950 in fees vs $990 for MSTY (simplified, not compounded). The $40.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BITO ER0.95%
MSTY ER0.99%

Strategy & risk

BITO tracks Bitcoin Futures with a futures-based approach, while MSTY tracks Strategy (MSTR) with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.8778 for BITO and 2.5604 for MSTY, indicating BITO is less volatile relative to the market.

BITO beta1.8778
MSTY beta2.5604

Fund details

BITO is managed by ProShares (launched 10/18/2021) with $1.40B in assets. MSTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 02/21/2024) with $765M in assets.

BITO AUM$1.40B
MSTY AUM$765M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is BITO or MSTY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. MSTY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BITO and MSTY?

BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) tracks Bitcoin Futures with a futures-based approach, while MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Strategy (MSTR) with a covered call approach. They are issued by ProShares and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both BITO and MSTY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, BITO or MSTY?

BITO has an expense ratio of 0.95% while MSTY charges 0.99%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BITO vs MSTY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BITO would generate roughly $11.75 per month ($141.00 annually). The same in MSTY would produce about $683.67 per month ($8,204.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BITO or MSTY?

BITO has outpaced MSTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -46.36% total return against -73.30%. Measured from Feb 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — MSTY has compounded at 4.40% a year versus 3.84% for BITO. BITO has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 44.4% against 64.9% for MSTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

BITO vs MSTY — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

BITO and MSTY are derivative-overlay ETFs that generate income through leveraged strategies on cryptocurrency-adjacent exposures, but they diverge sharply in mechanics and yield. BITO tracks Bitcoin futures contracts directly, delivering a 1.44% distribution yield with broad crypto beta exposure. MSTY runs a covered-call strategy on MicroStrategy stock (MSTR), generating an 83.49% annualized distribution rate by systematically selling call options against its holdings.

How they differ

The most fundamental difference is the underlying asset: BITO tracks Bitcoin futures via rolling contracts, while MSTY holds and writes options on MicroStrategy equity. This drives a massive yield gap—MSTY's 83.49% distribution rate dwarfs BITO's 1.44%—but comes with radically different risk and return mechanics. BITO aims to track Bitcoin spot price exposure through a futures overlay; MSTY caps upside by selling calls, sacrificing price appreciation for option premium income. MSTY also carries much higher beta (2.56 vs. 1.88), reflects a newer inception (February 2024 vs. October 2021), and distributes weekly rather than monthly, creating a more granular income stream. Both charge roughly similar expense ratios (0.99% and 0.95%), but MSTY's illiquidity and single-stock focus contrast with BITO's $1.44B in AUM and diversified futures exposure.

Who each is best for

BITO: Fits investors seeking direct Bitcoin price participation without owning spot Bitcoin, who are comfortable with futures tracking mechanics and monthly income, and who expect higher capital appreciation over multi-year periods.

MSTY: Fits investors who prioritize immediate, high cash flow over price appreciation, have a high risk tolerance for single-stock leverage, and accept that upside is capped by call-selling mechanics.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yield levels. MSTY's 83.49% annualized distribution yield is substantially higher than underlying equity returns are likely to produce, suggesting distributions will include significant return-of-capital and erode net asset value over time.
  • Call-cap dampens upside and creates whipsaw risk. MSTY's covered-call strategy caps gains if MSTR rallies, and rolling calls may lock in losses if the stock falls, leaving investors unable to fully participate in recoveries.
  • Single-stock and leverage concentration. MSTY's focus on MicroStrategy alone, combined with its 2.56 beta, concentrates exposure to one company's crypto correlation bet; a sharp downturn in MSTR or crypto sentiment can amplify losses.
  • Futures tracking and rolling costs. BITO's monthly rolling of Bitcoin futures contracts can drag returns in backwardated markets (when near-term contracts trade above far-term ones), reducing the actual Bitcoin exposure delivered.
  • Weekly distribution tax complexity. MSTY's weekly distributions create 52 taxable events per year, adding administrative burden and potentially pushing more gains into higher-bracket tax years versus monthly or quarterly alternatives.

Bottom line

If you want exposure to Bitcoin's spot price and are willing to accept moderate income in exchange for capital appreciation potential, BITO's futures-based approach offers liquid, diversified access. If your primary goal is extracting maximum current cash flow and you can tolerate capped gains and single-stock leverage, MSTY's covered-call yield is compelling—but the high distribution rate suggests meaningful principal erosion risk. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.