Generated July 2026 from current fund data.
Overview
BLOX and YBIT are both weekly-income ETFs using options strategies to generate high distributions from crypto exposure, but they target different underlying assets. BLOX holds a diversified basket of crypto-related equities and overlays an options strategy for income, while YBIT uses a covered call strategy on direct Bitcoin exposure. The key distinction: BLOX offers equity-based crypto exposure with a 38.54% distribution yield; YBIT targets pure Bitcoin price movement with a higher 47.22% yield via call sales.
How they differ
The biggest difference is the underlying asset. BLOX invests in crypto-related companies (equity portfolio), whereas YBIT holds Bitcoin directly through a covered call overlay. This means BLOX carries equity risk—company-specific earnings, competition, regulation—on top of crypto volatility, while YBIT's returns are purely a function of Bitcoin price and the income generated by selling calls against it.
Second, YBIT's yield is materially higher at 47.22% versus BLOX's 38.54%, reflecting the aggressiveness of Bitcoin call sales versus equity-based options income. That higher yield comes with higher downside risk: YBIT's beta of 1.54 means it will move nearly twice as sharply as Bitcoin in a downturn, whereas BLOX's beta of 3.11 indicates amplified sensitivity to moves in the underlying crypto-equity basket.
Third, YBIT has longer operational track record (inception July 2023) compared to BLOX (June 2025), though both are young. YBIT's $46.7M AUM is substantially smaller than BLOX's $321M, which may affect liquidity and AUM stability for the newer YBIT.
Who each is best for
BLOX: Fits investors seeking exposure to the crypto industry through traditional equity companies while collecting weekly income from an options overlay, and who can tolerate significant price swings from a leveraged crypto-equity beta.
YBIT: Fits investors with conviction on Bitcoin's direction who want to harvest volatility through call sales, accept that capped upside is the tradeoff for weekly distributions, and prefer direct Bitcoin exposure over equity proxies.
Key risks to know
- NAV erosion at ultra-high yields. Both funds distribute at rates above 38%, raising the likelihood that distributions include return-of-capital rather than economic earnings. This erodes net asset value over time unless the underlying asset appreciates enough to offset principal leakage.
- Call cap limits upside in YBIT. By selling weekly calls, YBIT caps its gains if Bitcoin rallies sharply. In a strong bull market, call premium income may lag total Bitcoin return by a wide margin, leaving investors with capped appreciation and a deteriorating NAV if realized gains don't cover the distributions.
- Equity-specific and crypto volatility in BLOX. The diversified equity portfolio introduces company-level risk (earnings misses, regulatory action on crypto-adjacent businesses) on top of Bitcoin's already high volatility, and the 3.11 beta amplifies moves in both directions.
- Concentration and bitcoin-only risk in YBIT. Holding only Bitcoin with no diversification means YBIT absorbs 100% of Bitcoin's price risk. A prolonged Bitcoin decline has no offset from other holdings, and the high yield cannot compensate for deep principal losses.
- Weekly rebalancing and expense leakage. Both funds rebalance options positions weekly, incurring trading costs within the 0.99% expense ratio. In low-volatility periods, options income may shrink while costs remain constant, potentially squeezing the yield that justifies the high distributions.
Bottom line
If you want diversified equity exposure to crypto companies and can accept a lower but still substantial weekly yield, BLOX offers broader ecosystem exposure with larger AUM. If you hold a conviction specifically on Bitcoin and are willing to accept capped upside in exchange for harvesting call premium, YBIT's direct Bitcoin exposure and higher yield may appeal—though both funds' distributions run the risk of principal erosion in flat or declining markets. Past performance does not predict future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.