DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BTC vs BTCI: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 10, 2026

ETFs16
Total AUM$15.9B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Grayscale Investments is known for pioneering digital asset investment products, offering exposure to cryptocurrencies and blockchain-related assets through a traditional fund structure. The company's nine ETFs focus primarily on digital assets, including flagship offerings like Bitcoin (BTC, BTCC) and Ethereum (ETH, ETHE), alongside diversified crypto and blockchain-focused funds. Grayscale's niche centers on making cryptocurrency investment accessible to institutional and retail investors seeking regulated, professionally managed digital asset exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BTC.

ETFs19
Total AUM$28.5B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BTCI.

Side-by-side snapshot

BTCBTCI
Full nameGrayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETFNEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
IssuerGrayscale InvestmentsNEOS
Last Close$27.96 as of July 10, 2026$28.57 as of July 10, 2026
Distribution yield0.00%27.43%
Distribution Safety Score 46
Expense ratio0.45%0.98%
AUM$3.39B$1.09B
Distribution frequencyMonthly
Underlying indexBitcoin ETPs
ObjectiveSeeks to generate high monthly income with potential appreciation through bitcoin exposure.
Asset classCryptoEquity
Inception date07/31/202410/16/2024
Beta1.88331.6764
Last dividend$0.6530
Ex-dividend date06/16/2026

Bottom lineChoose BTC if you want straightforward Bitcoin exposure for the long run. Choose BTCI if you want to maximize current income — roughly 27.43%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: BTCI's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while BTC keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BTC has lagged BTCI over the trailing twelve months, posting a -41.99% total return against -38.03%. Measured from Oct 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — BTC has compounded at -3.25% a year versus -3.46% for BTCI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Oct 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BTC-29.64%-41.99%-3.25%44.8%-1.32-1.73-53.3%
BTCI-27.26%-38.03%-3.46%40.2%-1.30-1.69-48.4%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 9, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Oct 2024” measures every fund from October 17, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

BTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

BTCI currently shows a 27.43% distribution yield. BTC has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

BTC is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.45% compared to 0.98%.

BTC is the larger fund by assets ($3.39B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose BTC

Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF

  • Want straightforward Bitcoin exposure for long-term appreciation, not income.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.45% expense ratio vs 0.98% for BTCI.

Choose BTCI

NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — BTCI distributes roughly 27.43% from selling options premium, while BTC makes no distribution.
  • Want crypto exposure that pays income rather than waiting on price alone.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 1.7 vs 1.9 for BTC.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BTC has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while BTCI would produce $228.58/month, at current distribution rates.

BTC yield0.00%
BTCI yield27.43%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BTC would cost approximately $450 in fees vs $980 for BTCI (simplified, not compounded). The $530.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BTC ER0.45%
BTCI ER0.98%

Strategy & risk

BTC is an ETF, while BTCI tracks Bitcoin ETPs with a crypto approach. Beta is 1.8833 for BTC and 1.6764 for BTCI, indicating BTCI is less volatile relative to the market.

BTC beta1.8833
BTCI beta1.6764

Fund details

BTC is managed by Grayscale Investments (launched 07/31/2024) with $3.39B in assets. BTCI is managed by NEOS (launched 10/16/2024) with $1.09B in assets.

BTC AUM$3.39B
BTCI AUM$1.09B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of BTC or BTCI pays more dividend income?

BTCI currently reports a distribution yield, while BTC has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between BTC and BTCI?

BTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF) is an ETF, while BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) tracks Bitcoin ETPs with a crypto approach. They are issued by Grayscale Investments and NEOS respectively.

Can I hold both BTC and BTCI?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, BTC or BTCI?

BTC has an expense ratio of 0.45% while BTCI charges 0.98%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BTC vs BTCI generate?

At current rates, BTC has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. The same in BTCI would produce about $228.58 per month ($2,743.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BTC or BTCI?

BTC has lagged BTCI over the trailing twelve months, posting a -41.99% total return against -38.03%. Measured from Oct 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — BTC has compounded at -3.25% a year versus -3.46% for BTCI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

BTC vs BTCI — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

BTC and BTCI are both bitcoin-focused ETFs launched in 2024, but they operate under fundamentally different income strategies. BTC is Grayscale's stripped-down bitcoin spot exposure—a simple holder of bitcoin with no distributions. BTCI wraps bitcoin ETPs and layers on an options overlay to generate monthly income, targeting a 28.09% distribution rate. The structural difference is stark: one is a passive bitcoin fund, the other is an active income generator using derivatives.

How they differ

BTC holds bitcoin directly with zero distributions and a 0.45% expense ratio, making it a pure-play long position. BTCI holds bitcoin ETPs as collateral and sells covered calls and cash-secured puts to generate monthly payouts at a 28.09% distribution rate—more than 60 times the yield of BTC's zero distribution. The second big difference: cost. BTCI charges 0.98% annually versus BTC's 0.45%, and that extra fee reflects the operational overhead of running an options program. Third, BTCI's beta of 1.68 is materially lower than BTC's 1.88, reflecting the dampening effect of its short call positions on upside volatility—but that same hedging caps appreciation when bitcoin rallies.

Who each is best for

BTC: Fits investors who want unlevered bitcoin exposure without worrying about distribution mechanics or income replacement, and who plan to hold for long-term capital appreciation rather than harvest monthly cash flow.

BTCI: Fits investors seeking regular monthly income from bitcoin exposure and willing to accept capped upside and potential NAV erosion in exchange for a high current yield, including those reassessing bitcoin's role as a steady-income asset rather than a pure growth holding.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at 28%+ yields: A 28.09% annualized distribution rate on a bitcoin asset that historically appreciates in the mid-to-high double digits (not in the 28% range year-round) means BTCI is distributing principal or relying heavily on options income rather than asset growth. Over a full market cycle, NAV compression is likely unless bitcoin's underlying price appreciation accelerates sharply.
  • Options overlay cap on appreciation: BTCI's covered-call program clips upside when bitcoin rallies beyond the strike price in any given month. BTC will capture full upside; BTCI holders forgo gains above the short call strikes. In a sustained bitcoin bull market, this is a material opportunity cost.
  • Concentration in single asset: Both funds are 100% bitcoin-exposed, so they move with bitcoin price action and regulatory risk. There is no diversification within the fund structure itself. BTC's higher beta (1.88) means it will swung harder on bitcoin moves than BTCI.
  • Options execution and rollover risk: BTCI must roll its call and put positions monthly. If implied volatility collapses, the options program generates less income, and the fund must either reduce distributions or lean on principal to maintain payouts. This is a source of distribution volatility that BTC does not face.

Bottom line

BTC offers straightforward bitcoin exposure with minimal fees and full upside capture; BTCI trades upside potential for predictable monthly income and higher costs. If you value simplicity and long-term appreciation, BTC's lower cost and zero-hedging structure stand out. If you're looking to harvest bitcoin exposure as an income stream and accept capped gains and NAV risk in return, BTCI's monthly distributions are the defining feature—but they come with the complexity and timing risk of an options program. Past performance of either structure does not predict future bitcoin prices or distribution sustainability.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.