DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BTCI vs YBTC: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 9, 2026

ETFs19
Total AUM$28.5B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BTCI.

ETFs55
Total AUM$28.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering specialized ETFs that focus on income generation and thematic investing strategies. The firm operates 42 funds across five distinct families—Core, HALO, Income, Thematic, and WeeklyPay—with a particular emphasis on covered call strategies and weekly distribution products designed to generate regular cash flows. Notable offerings include ticker symbols like AAPW, AMDW, and AMZW (which employ covered call strategies on major technology stocks), along with thematic funds covering areas such as artificial intelligence (CHAT), cryptocurrency mining (DRAM), and other innovative sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on YBTC.

Side-by-side snapshot

BTCIYBTC
Full nameNEOS Bitcoin High Income ETFRoundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
IssuerNEOSRoundhill Investments
Last Close$28.57 as of July 9, 2026$17.59 as of July 9, 2026
Distribution yield27.43%38.16%
Distribution Safety Score 4646
Expense ratio0.98%0.95%
AUM$1.09B$130M
Distribution frequencyMonthlyWeekly
Underlying indexBitcoin ETPsBitcoin
ObjectiveSeeks to generate high monthly income with potential appreciation through bitcoin exposure.Covered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/16/202406/27/2024
Beta1.67641.7556
Last dividend$0.6530$0.1291
Ex-dividend date06/16/202607/08/2026

Bottom lineChoose BTCI if you want crypto exposure that pays you along the way, not just price gains. Choose YBTC if you want to maximize current income — roughly 38.16%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: YBTC's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while BTCI keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BTCI has outpaced YBTC over the trailing twelve months, posting a -38.03% total return against -41.94%. Measured from Oct 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — BTCI has compounded at -3.46% a year versus -9.83% for YBTC. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Oct 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BTCI-27.26%-38.03%-3.46%40.2%-1.30-1.69-48.4%
YBTC-29.14%-41.94%-9.83%40.6%-1.46-1.84-49.9%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 9, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Oct 2024” measures every fund from October 17, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

YBTC offers the higher yield at 38.16% vs 27.43% for BTCI. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

YBTC is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.95% compared to 0.98%.

They track different benchmarks: BTCI is linked to Bitcoin ETPs while YBTC tracks Bitcoin, which means their performance drivers differ.

BTCI is the larger fund by assets ($1.09B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BTCI would generate roughly $228.58/month, while YBTC would produce $318.00/month, at current distribution rates.

BTCI yield27.43%
YBTC yield38.16%
Monthly diff on $10K$89.42

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BTCI would cost approximately $980 in fees vs $950 for YBTC (simplified, not compounded). The $30.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BTCI ER0.98%
YBTC ER0.95%

Strategy & risk

BTCI tracks Bitcoin ETPs with a crypto approach, while YBTC tracks Bitcoin with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.6764 for BTCI and 1.7556 for YBTC, indicating BTCI is less volatile relative to the market.

BTCI beta1.6764
YBTC beta1.7556

Fund details

BTCI is managed by NEOS (launched 10/16/2024) with $1.09B in assets. YBTC is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 06/27/2024) with $130M in assets.

BTCI AUM$1.09B
YBTC AUM$130M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is BTCI or YBTC better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. YBTC currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BTCI and YBTC?

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) tracks Bitcoin ETPs with a crypto approach, while YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) tracks Bitcoin with a covered call approach. They are issued by NEOS and Roundhill Investments respectively.

Can I hold both BTCI and YBTC?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, BTCI or YBTC?

BTCI has an expense ratio of 0.98% while YBTC charges 0.95%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BTCI vs YBTC generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BTCI would generate roughly $228.58 per month ($2,743.00 annually). The same in YBTC would produce about $318.00 per month ($3,816.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BTCI or YBTC?

BTCI has outpaced YBTC over the trailing twelve months, posting a -38.03% total return against -41.94%. Measured from Oct 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — BTCI has compounded at -3.46% a year versus -9.83% for YBTC. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare BTCI with

People also compare YBTC with

Popular comparisons

BTCI vs YBTC — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

Both BTCI and YBTC use Bitcoin as their underlying asset but pursue fundamentally different income strategies. BTCI holds Bitcoin ETPs and generates income through options techniques, targeting a 28.09% distribution rate paid monthly. YBTC runs a covered call overlay on Bitcoin itself, aiming for a much higher 40.51% yield paid weekly. The key distinction is yield level and frequency: YBTC is engineered for maximum income extraction, while BTCI seeks a more moderate income-plus-appreciation blend.

How they differ

The biggest difference is yield and income structure. YBTC targets 40.51% annualized distributions paid weekly, versus BTCI's 28.09% paid monthly. That gap suggests YBTC relies more heavily on options premium (covered calls) to fill the income gap, whereas BTCI may blend options income with some underlying Bitcoin appreciation.

Second, scale and maturity matter. BTCI has $1.09B in AUM and launched in October 2024, giving it more institutional heft and a slightly longer track record. YBTC holds just $130M, having launched in June 2024, making it a newer, smaller vehicle with less operating history. Both carry similar expense ratios—0.95% for YBTC versus 0.98% for BTCI—so cost is not a meaningful differentiator.

Third, the beta profiles are close but not identical. YBTC has a beta of 1.7556 versus BTCI's 1.6764, suggesting YBTC may amplify Bitcoin's price moves slightly more, though the difference is modest. Both betas exceed 1.6, meaning both will likely outpace Bitcoin itself in up markets and underperform more sharply in downturns.

Who each is best for

  • BTCI: Fits investors who want meaningful monthly Bitcoin income without chasing maximum yield, and who tolerate options-overlay volatility but prefer a fund with larger AUM and slightly longer operating history.
  • YBTC: Fits investors hunting for maximum weekly income from Bitcoin, with high risk tolerance for call-assignment risk and NAV compression, and comfort with a smaller, newer fund structure.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yields: YBTC's 40.51% distribution rate approaches levels where distributions may rely heavily on return of capital, risking NAV decay over time. BTCI's 28.09% yield sits at a similar threshold and carries comparable erosion risk.
  • Call assignment and upside cap: Both funds employ covered calls, which cap upside if Bitcoin rallies sharply. YBTC's weekly call rolls mean tighter assignment risk; BTCI's monthly cycle offers more flexibility but less frequent adjustment.
  • Bitcoin price volatility amplified by leverage-like beta: Both funds have betas above 1.6, meaning they will decline faster than Bitcoin itself in a sharp bear market, compounding the pressure on NAV when distributions are already under stress.
  • Newness and limited historical volatility data: Both funds launched in 2024. YBTC is especially new (June) and smaller ($130M), leaving less clarity on how the strategy behaves across a full market cycle or in sustained Bitcoin downturns.
  • Options-derived income sustainability: Weekly (YBTC) versus monthly (BTCI) call selling means YBTC resets premium capture more frequently, which can amplify volatility in sideways or declining markets where call premiums compress.

Bottom line

If you prioritize a steadier monthly cadence and a fund with larger assets and a longer track record, BTCI's 28.09% yield and $1.09B AUM offer a more established entry point. If you're chasing maximum income and can stomach the structural risks of near-50%-annualized distributions and weekly call rolls, YBTC's 40.51% yield and nimbler rebalancing may appeal—but at the cost of higher NAV erosion risk and a much smaller, newer platform. Past performance, especially in a fund class this young, does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.