DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

DGRO vs DIVO: Keep the Growth, or Sell Some of It for Cash?

A head-to-head of iShares Core Dividend Growth and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income covering construction and cost.

Updated October 8, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • DGROInvestors who want a quality-dividend tilt rather than the whole market.
  • DIVOInvestors who want higher current income (4.81% vs 2.00% for DGRO).

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

DGRO has outpaced DIVO over the trailing twelve months, posting a 15.15% total return against 14.23%. The picture flips over 5 years, though — DIVO has compounded at 11.34% a year, ahead of DGRO at 11.01%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualizedSince Dec 2016Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
DGRO12.29%15.15%18.68%11.01%13.04%11.7%1.081.58-14.0%
DIVO10.04%14.23%17.12%11.34%12.60%10.8%1.061.55-12.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 9, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Dec 2016” measures every fund from December 14, 2016 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricDGRODIVO
Full nameiShares Core Dividend Growth ETFAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
IssueriSharesAmplify ETFs
Last Close$76.88 as of October 8, 2026$47.13 as of October 8, 2026
Distribution rate2.00%4.81%
Trailing 12-month yield1.94%6.40%
Distribution Safety Score™ 10093
Safety-Adjusted Yield 2.00%4.47%
Expense ratio0.08%0.56%
AUM$42.2B$7.79B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyMonthly
Underlying indexMorningstar US Dividend Growth Index—
ObjectiveSeeks to track the investment results of the Morningstar U.S. Dividend Growth Index, which measures the performance of U.S. equities with a history of consistently growing dividends. Companies must have a payout ratio less than 75% and are excluded if in the top decile based on dividend yield.Seeks to provide current income as the primary objective and capital appreciation as the secondary objective by investing at least 80% of net assets in dividend-paying U.S. exchange-traded equity securities while opportunistically utilizing covered call options on those securities.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date06/10/201412/14/2016
Beta0.660.54
Last dividend$0.385$0.18904
Ex-dividend date09/15/202609/29/2026

Bottom lineChoose DGRO if you want a quality-dividend tilt rather than the whole market. Choose DIVO if you want higher current income (4.81% vs 2.00% for DGRO).

Dividend-growth screen versus overwrite

DGRO screens US dividend growers. DIVO writes calls on a dividend book. One keeps more upside; the other sells some of it.

DGRODIVO
EngineDividend-growth screenCovered-call overwrite
Expense ratio0.08%0.56%
Distribution rate2.00%4.81%

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs467
Total AUM$4679B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares, operated by BlackRock, is one of the largest and most established ETF providers globally, known for offering broad, liquid index-tracking funds across nearly all asset classes and investment styles. The lineup encompasses a comprehensive range of strategies including core equity and bond exposure, dividend and income-focused funds, covered call strategies, ESG and thematic investments, factor-based approaches, alternatives, commodities, and municipal bonds, serving both individual and institutional investors. With numerous popular ticker symbols and extensive diversification across geographies, sectors, and investment objectives, iShares provides one of the market's widest selections of ETFs for building diversified portfolios.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DGRO.

ETFs46
Total AUM$16.6B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Amplify ETFs is known for offering specialized, thematic investment solutions across diverse market segments including digital assets, commodities, and dividend strategies. The issuer's lineup spans multiple fund families covering income-focused strategies, covered call approaches, commodity exposure, and thematic sectors such as cybersecurity, blockchain, gaming, and sustainable investing. Notable for tickers like BLOK (blockchain), HACK (cybersecurity), and DIVO (dividend), Amplify combines traditional income strategies with alternative themes and emerging asset classes, appealing to investors seeking both yield and exposure to innovation-driven sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DIVO.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

DIVO offers the higher yield at 4.81% vs 2.00% for DGRO. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

DGRO is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.08% compared to 0.56%.

DGRO is the larger fund by assets ($42.2B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose DGRO

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

  • Want a quality-dividend tilt — screened payers rather than the broad index.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.08% expense ratio vs 0.56% for DIVO.

Choose DIVO

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

  • Want higher current income — DIVO yields 4.81% vs 2.00% for DGRO.
  • Want broad equity exposure.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, DGRO would generate roughly $50.00 cash per distribution, while DIVO would produce $40.08 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

DGRO yield2.00%
DIVO yield4.81%
Cash diff on $10K$9.92

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, DGRO would cost approximately $80 in fees vs $560 for DIVO (simplified, not compounded). The $480.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

DGRO ER0.08%
DIVO ER0.56%

Strategy & risk

DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while DIVO is an ETF built around a derivative overlay strategy. Beta is 0.66 for DGRO and 0.54 for DIVO, making DIVO the less volatile of the two by this measure.

DGRO beta0.66
DIVO beta0.54

Fund details

DGRO is managed by iShares (launched 06/10/2014) with $42.2B in assets. DIVO is managed by Amplify ETFs (launched 12/14/2016) with $7.79B in assets.

DGRO AUM$42.2B
DIVO AUM$7.79B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between DGRO and DIVO?

DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) screens US dividend growers. DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) writes calls on a dividend stock book. One keeps more upside; the other sells some of it for cash. Cost is 0.08% versus 0.56%; distributions are 2.00% and 4.81% as of October 2026.

What is the current distribution rate for DGRO and DIVO?

DGRO currently distributes 2.00% and DIVO 4.81%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is DGRO or DIVO better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. DIVO currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both DGRO and DIVO?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is DGRO or DIVO safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — DGRO scores 100, DIVO scores 93, so DGRO's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, DGRO or DIVO?

DGRO has an expense ratio of 0.08% while DIVO charges 0.56%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in DGRO vs DIVO generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in DGRO would generate roughly $50.00 cash per distribution ($200.00 annually). The same in DIVO would produce about $40.08 cash per distribution ($481.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, DGRO or DIVO?

DGRO has outpaced DIVO over the trailing twelve months, posting a 15.15% total return against 14.23%. The picture flips over 5 years, though — DIVO has compounded at 11.34% a year, ahead of DGRO at 11.01%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

DGRO vs DIVO — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Overview

DGRO and DIVO are both U.S. dividend-focused ETFs, but they pursue fundamentally different philosophies. DGRO tracks the Morningstar U.S. Dividend Growth Index, selecting companies with consistent dividend growth histories and excluding high-yield payers. DIVO holds dividend-paying equities while systematically selling covered call options on them to generate additional income. The result is a stark yield gap: DGRO targets capital appreciation with a 2.00% payout, while DIVO prioritizes current income via options overlay at 4.81%.

How they differ

The core distinction is strategy: DGRO is a passive index tracker seeking dividend-growth equities, while DIVO actively writes covered calls on its holdings to boost yield. This explains the distribution-rate gap of 2.82 percentage points—DIVO's income comes partly from dividends and partly from option premiums.

The second difference is fund design and expenses. DGRO's 0.08% fee reflects straightforward index replication; DIVO's 0.56% fee covers the cost of active covered-call management. DGRO's underlying index explicitly excludes high-dividend-yield stocks (top decile), while DIVO holds dividend payers broadly but caps their individual yield contribution through call writing.

Third is fund size and beta. Both carry below-market beta—DGRO's 0.66 and DIVO's 0.54—but DGRO's higher beta suggests exposure to more economically-sensitive dividend-growth names, while DIVO's lower beta likely reflects the dampening effect of short calls on volatility.

Who each is best for

DGRO: Fits investors seeking dividend growth alongside capital appreciation, with a longer time horizon and tolerance for lower current yield. The structure suits allocation builders who want U.S. dividend exposure without forcing outsized payouts or options complexity.

DIVO: Designed for investors prioritizing near-term income from a dividend portfolio and willing to accept capped upside in exchange for steady option premiums. Works for those comfortable with covered-call mechanics and shorter holding periods focused on distribution cash flow.

Key risks to know

  • Call cap and upside sacrifice. When DIVO's underlying equities rise sharply, the short calls are exercised and shares are called away, capping gains. This is the structural trade-off for enhanced yield; strong bull rallies directly reduce capital appreciation potential.
  • Dividend-cut sensitivity and index selection. DGRO's Morningstar index excludes stocks in the top yield decile by design, which filters out mature, stable high-yielders but may overweight higher-payout-ratio growth names at inflection points. Dividend cuts among growth names can undermine total return.
  • NAV erosion at distribution yields above 5%. DIVO's 4.81% yield, including option premium, is elevated; if dividend payouts decline or call premiums compress due to lower volatility, the fund may distribute capital and erode NAV over time.
  • Options volatility dependency. DIVO's income generation relies on implied volatility levels that support call premium; in a sustained low-volatility environment, call premiums decline and distributions may fall, making the fund less attractive on a yield basis.

Bottom line

If you want dividend growth and moderate income with lower fees and passive management, DGRO's simpler approach and 34416394218 asset advantage stands out. If you prioritize current monthly income and are willing to forgo substantial capital appreciation in exchange for call premiums, DIVO's 4.81% distribution rate addresses that income need—though verify that option premiums remain stable in your market outlook. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.