DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

DGRO vs VTI: Growing Payouts, or Everything?

A head-to-head of iShares Core Dividend Growth and Vanguard's total-market ETF covering the screen, cost, and overlap.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • DGROInvestors who want higher current income (2.04% vs 1.02% for VTI).
  • VTIInvestors who want the broadest one-fund diversification at rock-bottom cost.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

DGRO has lagged VTI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 13.61% total return against 15.72%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: VTI has compounded at 14.79% a year, against 13.25% for DGRO. DGRO has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 11.7% against 15.4% for VTI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Jun 2014Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
DGRO9.53%13.61%17.92%10.63%13.25%12.06%11.7%1.031.50-14.0%
VTI12.23%15.72%22.42%12.31%14.79%13.19%15.4%1.031.50-19.3%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jun 2014” measures every fund from June 12, 2014 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricDGROVTI
Full nameiShares Core Dividend Growth ETFVanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
IssueriSharesVanguard
Underlying indexMorningstar US Dividend Growth IndexMorningstar US Total Market Index
Last Close$75.39 as of September 30, 2026$374.24 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate2.04%1.02%
Trailing 12-month yield1.98%1.05%
Distribution Safety Score™ 100100
Safety-Adjusted Yield 2.04%1.02%
Expense ratio0.08%0.03%
AUM$42.5B$700B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
ObjectiveSeeks to track the investment results of the Morningstar U.S. Dividend Growth Index, which measures the performance of U.S. equities with a history of consistently growing dividends. Companies must have a payout ratio less than 75% and are excluded if in the top decile based on dividend yield.Seeks to track the Morningstar US Total Market Index.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date06/10/201405/24/2001
Beta0.661.0379
Last dividend$0.385$0.9555 payable today
Ex-dividend date09/15/202609/28/2026

Bottom lineChoose DGRO if you want higher current income (2.04% vs 1.02% for VTI). Choose VTI if you want the broadest one-fund diversification at rock-bottom cost.

DGRO vs VTI: dividend growth or the whole market?

DGRO screens for rising payouts. VTI is the US total market. Screen versus core is the decision.

DGROVTI
What it ownsMorningstar US Dividend Growth IndexMorningstar US Total Market Index
Expense ratio0.08%0.03%
Distribution rate2.04%1.02%

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs466
Total AUM$4683B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DGRO.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4677B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VTI.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

DGRO offers the higher yield at 2.04% vs 1.02% for VTI. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

VTI is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.03% compared to 0.08%.

They have different reference exposures: DGRO is linked to Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index while VTI is linked to Morningstar US Total Market Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

VTI is the larger fund by assets ($700B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose DGRO

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

  • Want higher current income — DGRO yields 2.04% vs 1.02% for VTI.
  • Want a quality-dividend tilt — screened payers rather than the broad index.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.7 vs 1.0 for VTI.

Choose VTI

Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF

  • Want the broadest single-fund diversification across the entire market.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.03% expense ratio vs 0.08% for DGRO.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, DGRO would generate roughly $51.00 cash per distribution, while VTI would produce $25.50 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

DGRO yield2.04%
VTI yield1.02%
Cash diff on $10K$25.50

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, DGRO would cost approximately $80 in fees vs $30 for VTI (simplified, not compounded). The $50.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

DGRO ER0.08%
VTI ER0.03%

Strategy & risk

DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while VTI tracks Morningstar US Total Market Index. Beta is 0.66 for DGRO and 1.0379 for VTI, making DGRO the less volatile of the two by this measure.

DGRO beta0.66
VTI beta1.0379

Fund details

DGRO is managed by iShares (launched 06/10/2014) with $42.5B in assets. VTI is managed by Vanguard (launched 05/24/2001) with $700B in assets.

DGRO AUM$42.5B
VTI AUM$700B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between DGRO and VTI?

DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index and distributes 2.04% quarterly. VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF) holds the whole US market and distributes 1.02%. Cost is 0.08% versus 0.03%. A dividend-growth screen versus the total market is the decision. Figures as of September 2026.

What is the current distribution rate for DGRO and VTI?

DGRO currently distributes 2.04% and VTI 1.02%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is DGRO or VTI better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. DGRO currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both DGRO and VTI?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is DGRO or VTI safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: DGRO scores 100, VTI scores 100. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. DGRO has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.66 vs 1.04 for VTI). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, DGRO or VTI?

DGRO has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VTI charges 0.03%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in DGRO vs VTI generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in DGRO would generate roughly $51.00 cash per distribution ($204.00 annually). The same in VTI would produce about $25.50 cash per distribution ($102.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, DGRO or VTI?

DGRO has lagged VTI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 13.61% total return against 15.72%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: VTI has compounded at 14.79% a year, against 13.25% for DGRO. DGRO has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 11.7% against 15.4% for VTI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

DGRO vs VTI — at a glance

Generated September 26, 2026.

Overview

DGRO and VTI are both broad U.S. equity ETFs tracking Morningstar indexes, but they serve different investment goals. DGRO focuses on dividend-growth stocks — companies with a history of rising payouts and disciplined payout ratios below 75% — while VTI targets the total U.S. stock market, capturing large-, mid-, and small-cap exposure without a dividend filter. The core distinction is that DGRO narrows the market to a dividend-quality subset, whereas VTI aims for the entire investable universe.

How they differ

DGRO's strategy excludes the highest-dividend-yielding stocks (top decile by yield) and requires a payout ratio discipline that VTI doesn't impose. This means DGRO's portfolio skews toward companies reinvesting earnings while still raising their payout over time, whereas VTI holds the full market — including non-dividend-payers, high-yield stocks, and companies returning capital through buybacks instead of dividends. VTI is dramatically larger, with $700B in assets compared to DGRO's $42.5B, and carries a lower expense ratio (0.03% versus 0.08%). DGRO's beta of 0.66 suggests lower volatility relative to the market, whereas VTI's 1.0379 beta tracks the broad market's swing more closely.

Who each is best for

DGRO: Fits investors seeking income from stocks with a track record of raising dividends — those who favor stable, growing cash flow over maximum total return or market-cap-weighted exposure.

VTI: Fits investors who want to own the entire U.S. stock market in a single holding, regardless of dividend history or payout policy, and who prioritize lowest-cost, broadest diversification.

Key risks to know

  • Dividend-growth selection risk (DGRO specific). By excluding top-decile yielders and companies with payout ratios above 75%, DGRO misses higher-yielding equities and avoids some high-dividend stocks that have sustained or grown payouts; the filtered approach may underperform if omitted segments outperform.
  • Concentrated industry or sector exposure (DGRO specific). A dividend-growth screen tends to overweight mature, profitable sectors (utilities, consumer staples, healthcare, financials) and underweight technology and other lower-yielding growth pockets; holdings overlap with broad indexes but with skewed composition.
  • Beta and downside capture (DGRO specific). DGRO's 0.66 beta indicates lower volatility in normal markets, but a dividend-focused filter may lead to different drawdown behavior in stress periods compared to the broad market; check performance correlation during recessions if downside protection is a goal.
  • Market-cap concentration in mega-cap (VTI specific). VTI holds the entire market, including the massive weighting toward the largest technology and financial companies; this reflects market reality but means small- and mid-cap exposure trails largest companies by weight.
  • Reinvestment-rate dependence on both. Both funds rely on dividend and capital-gains reinvestment to compound returns; if rates fall or economic conditions slow dividend growth, the income base may stagnate or decline.

Bottom line

If you want income from stocks with a discipline around payout growth and are willing to accept lower market-cap weighting and sector concentration, DGRO isolates that strategy. If you're building a core portfolio and want the simplest, cheapest way to own the entire U.S. market, VTI's $700B asset base, 0.03% expense ratio, and broad exposure make it the default starting point. Past performance doesn't predict future results; dividend-growth strategies and total-market strategies can diverge materially over periods measured in years.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.