DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

DRAM vs DRMP vs HBMX: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A side-by-side comparison of Roundhill Memory ETF, Tuttle Capital Memory Stack Income Blast ETF and Tuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated June 20, 2026

ETFs51
Total AUM$27.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering specialized ETFs that focus on income generation and thematic investing strategies. The firm operates 42 funds across five distinct families—Core, HALO, Income, Thematic, and WeeklyPay—with a particular emphasis on covered call strategies and weekly distribution products designed to generate regular cash flows. Notable offerings include ticker symbols like AAPW, AMDW, and AMZW (which employ covered call strategies on major technology stocks), along with thematic funds covering areas such as artificial intelligence (CHAT), cryptocurrency mining (DRAM), and other innovative sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DRAM.

ETFs10
Total AUM$25.8M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Tuttle Capital Management operates a focused lineup of 7 ETFs that emphasize thematic investing and income-focused strategies. The firm's offerings span specialized areas including cryptocurrency exposure (BITK), photography and imaging (FOTO), and sector-specific themes like healthcare (HALX) and technology (MSTK), alongside income-oriented products under their Income and Income Blast families. The issuer targets investors seeking unconventional thematic strategies rather than broad-based index exposure, with notable tickers like MAGO and SPCI rounding out their niche-oriented portfolio.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DRMP and HBMX.

Side-by-side snapshot

DRAMDRMPHBMX
Full nameRoundhill Memory ETFTuttle Capital Memory Stack Income Blast ETFTuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETF
IssuerRoundhill InvestmentsTuttle Capital ManagementTuttle Capital Management
Last Close$76.71 as of June 20, 2026$32.09 as of June 20, 2026$30.39 as of June 20, 2026
Distribution yield34.98%
Expense ratio0.65%0.95%0.95%
AUM$17.5B$2.58M
Distribution frequencyNoneWeeklyAnnual
Underlying index
ObjectiveGrowthActively managed, non-diversified ETF seeking current income. Under normal market conditions the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of memory-stack companies (memory semiconductor and related supply-chain firms) and instruments providing economically equivalent exposure, while generating income through a systematic put credit spread strategy on memory semiconductor-related securities, ETFs, and indexes. Distributes net investment income weekly.HBMX is an actively managed, concentrated ETF seeking long-term capital appreciation through focused exposure to the memory semiconductor ecosystem — DRAM, NAND, and high-bandwidth memory (HBM) producers plus the advanced packaging, testing, and equipment companies behind AI infrastructure.
Asset classEquityEquityEquity
Inception date04/03/202606/11/202606/02/2026
Last dividend$0.2000
Ex-dividend date06/18/2026

— Distribution yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because DRAM launched April 2026 and HBMX launched June 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

SymbolYTDSince Jun 2026
DRAM176.33%17.80%
DRMP15.68%15.68%
HBMX13.69%10.91%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of June 18, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2026” measures every fund from June 11, 2026 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window.

Quick verdict

DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF), DRMP (Tuttle Capital Memory Stack Income Blast ETF), HBMX (Tuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETF) are ETFs that take different approaches.

DRMP reports a 34.98% distribution yield; the others have not yet established a full distribution history.

DRAM is the cheapest with an expense ratio of 0.65%, compared to 0.95% for DRMP and 0.95% for HBMX.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment: DRAM has no reported yield yet, DRMP generates ~$291.50/month, HBMX has no reported yield yet at current distribution rates.

DRAM yield
DRMP yield34.98%
HBMX yield

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000: DRAM costs ~$650, DRMP costs ~$950, HBMX costs ~$950 in fees (simplified, not compounded).

DRAM ER0.65%
DRMP ER0.95%
HBMX ER0.95%

Strategy & risk

DRAM is an ETF; DRMP is an ETF; HBMX is an ETF.

Fund details

DRAM is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 04/03/2026) with $17.5B in assets. DRMP is managed by Tuttle Capital Management (launched 06/11/2026) with $2.58M in assets. HBMX is managed by Tuttle Capital Management (launched 06/02/2026) with — in assets.

DRAM AUM$17.5B
DRMP AUM$2.58M
HBMX AUM

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of DRAM, DRMP, HBMX is best for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. DRMP currently offers the highest reported distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility, and funds without an established distribution history have no comparable yield to evaluate. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between DRAM, DRMP, HBMX?

DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) is an ETF, issued by Roundhill Investments. DRMP (Tuttle Capital Memory Stack Income Blast ETF) is an ETF, issued by Tuttle Capital Management. HBMX (Tuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETF) is an ETF, issued by Tuttle Capital Management.

Can I hold DRAM, DRMP, HBMX together?

Yes. Many income investors hold multiple dividend ETFs to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has the lowest fees among DRAM, DRMP, HBMX?

DRAM has an expense ratio of 0.65%, DRMP has an expense ratio of 0.95%, HBMX has an expense ratio of 0.95%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 generate in each?

$10,000 in DRAM has no reported monthly income yet. $10,000 in DRMP yields ~$291.50/month ($3,498.00/year). $10,000 in HBMX has no reported monthly income yet.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare DRAM with

People also compare DRMP with

Popular comparisons

DRAM vs DRMP vs HBMX — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

These three funds all target the memory semiconductor ecosystem — a critical input to AI infrastructure — but pursue radically different strategies. DRAM is a passive, diversified thematic ETF with no distributions and the lowest fees. DRMP is an actively managed, non-diversified income fund that layers in weekly put credit spreads to generate a 34.98% distribution yield. HBMX is an actively managed, concentrated growth fund with no stated distribution and annual payouts, designed for capital appreciation rather than income.

How they differ

The foundational split is income versus growth. DRMP exists almost entirely to generate weekly income through systematic option selling on memory stocks and indexes, which explains its 34.98% distribution yield and weekly payout frequency. DRAM and HBMX have no stated distribution rates and are structured as accumulation vehicles — but DRAM is passively indexed and globally diversified across the memory supply chain, while HBMX is actively managed and explicitly concentrated, holding a narrower set of DRAM, NAND, and HBM producers plus packaging and equipment firms.

The fee and structure gap clarifies the tradeoff. DRAM charges 0.65% and has $17.5B in assets, offering scale and passive index pricing. Both DRMP and HBMX charge 0.95% and are actively managed, but DRMP's $2.6M AUM reflects its youth and speculative income focus, while HBMX's AUM is not disclosed. DRMP uses leverage embedded in its put-spread strategy; HBMX does not.

Who each is best for

  • DRAM: Fits investors who want broad, low-cost exposure to memory semiconductor supply chains without the complexity of derivatives, options overlays, or concentrated bets — and who are comfortable with zero near-term income.
  • DRMP: Designed for income-focused investors with high risk tolerance who understand options mechanics and are willing to accept weekly rebalancing, NAV volatility from put-spread mechanics, and the possibility that distributions rely partly on return-of-capital treatment rather than underlying gains.
  • HBMX: Matches investors seeking concentrated growth exposure to memory AI infrastructure through active management, accepting higher concentration risk in exchange for a manager's conviction bets on packaging, testing, and equipment specialists alongside core memory producers.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yields: DRMP's 34.98% distribution yield — paid weekly — creates structural pressure to return capital rather than rely on underlying appreciation. The fund's small size ($2.6M AUM) amplifies reinvestment drag and makes it vulnerable to capital withdrawal spirals if demand for memory-related income falters.
  • Options and leverage risk in DRMP: Put credit spreads generate income by accepting the obligation to buy memory stocks at strike prices during market downturns. A sharp sell-off in semiconductor equity, particularly memory, could force realized losses and rapid NAV deterioration as the fund meets spread obligations while the underlying positions decline simultaneously.
  • Concentration and manager risk in HBMX: Explicit concentration in a narrow ecosystem (DRAM, NAND, HBM, plus equipment and packaging) means a single adverse development — such as overcapacity in HBM or a surprise shift in AI chip architecture — can hit a large share of holdings at once. Active management introduces the risk that conviction bets underperform passive alternatives.
  • Sector-specific cyclicality: Memory semiconductors are highly cyclical and capital-intensive. Both DRMP and HBMX lack the diversification cushion that DRAM's passive, broad approach offers; pricing pressure, inventory swings, or manufacturing disruptions will hit concentrated and actively managed memory-only funds harder.
  • Liquidity and redemption risk in DRMP: At $2.6M AUM, DRMP faces meaningful liquidity constraints. Large redemptions during market stress could force the fund to liquidate positions or unwind put spreads at unfavorable prices, crystallizing losses and widening the bid-ask spread.

Bottom line

DRAM suits investors seeking passive, low-cost memory exposure without income dependence; DRMP targets income-first traders willing to accept options leverage and NAV volatility in exchange for weekly payouts; HBMX offers active, concentrated growth exposure but concentrates single-sector and manager risk. None of these funds should be held in isolation without understanding the memory cycle and your own risk tolerance — past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.