GALX
Not rated
No published distribution safety rating is available.
ETF Comparison
GALX vs ROKT: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of VistaShares Space Supercycle® ETF and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated November 6, 2026
No track record yet. GALX launched within the last six months. The forward distribution rate is left blank until a payout is published.
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Price and total return
Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.
Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.
Distribution Safety Score
An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.
ROKT
Caution
High confidence
Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric |  GALX |  ROKT |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | VistaShares Space Supercycle® ETF | SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF |
| Issuer | VistaShares | State Street |
| Underlying index | Global space-economy value chain | S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index |
| Last Close | $19.89 as of November 6, 2026 | $96.55 as of November 6, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | — | 0.21% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | 0.22% |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | — | 55 |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | — | 0.12% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.45% |
| AUM | $2.71M | $150M |
| Distribution frequency | Annual | Quarterly |
| Objective | The VistaShares Space Supercycle® ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation by actively investing in a global portfolio of companies that build, launch, operate, and enable the space economy, from launch systems and satellite infrastructure to communications and enabling technologies. | Tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, providing exposure to companies driving innovation in deep space and deep sea frontiers. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | 07/15/2026 | 10/19/2018 |
| Beta | — | 1.49 |
| Last dividend | — | $0.051 |
| Ex-dividend date | — | 09/21/2026 |
— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because GALX launched July 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.
Total returns
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
GALX has lagged ROKT over the year to date, posting a -19.34% total return against 9.76%. ROKT has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 26.9% against 34.6% for GALX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | Since Jul 2026 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GALX | -19.34% | -19.34% | 34.6% | -2.10 | -2.58 | -28.5% |
| ROKT | 9.76% | -12.99% | 26.9% | -1.80 | -2.17 | -24.0% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jul 2026” measures every fund from July 16, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Jul 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Jul 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Bottom lineWe won't call this one: GALX launched July 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional. What is already clear from the numbers above: the two do not cost the same — ROKT charges 0.45% against 0.75% for GALX, and on funds tracking the same thing that gap compounds every year you hold.
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
ETFs13
Total AUM$2.34B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
The firm's fund portfolio, featuring tickers such as ACKY, POW, and QUSA, emphasizes sector-specific and alternative investment themes rather than conventional dividend or income-focused approaches. VistaShares serves investors looking for differentiated exposure to emerging trends and niche market segments through a compact but specialized ETF offering.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on GALX.
ETFs186
Total AUM$2.15T
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ROKT.
Quick verdict
GALX (VistaShares Space Supercycle® ETF) and ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.
ROKT currently shows a 0.21% distribution yield. GALX has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.
ROKT is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.45% compared to 0.75%.
They have different reference exposures: GALX is linked to Global space-economy value chain while ROKT is linked to S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, which means their performance drivers differ.
ROKT has $150M in assets vs $2.71M for GALX, but GALX only launched July 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.
Top-holdings overlap
Positions that appear in every fund's top 10. Issuers disclose only the largest weights, so this captures the overlap of the concentrated end of each book — not the full portfolios.
— shared positions
GALX top-10 holdings unavailable
ROKT 0.0% of its top-10 weight
Top-10 holdings unavailable for GALX — cannot compute overlap.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment at current distribution rates, GALX has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, while ROKT would pay about $21.00 a year (about $5.25 per quarterly distribution).
GALX yield—
ROKT yield0.21%
Cost & efficiency
Over 10 years on $10,000, GALX would cost approximately $750 in fees vs $450 for ROKT (simplified, not compounded). The $300.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.
GALX ER0.75%
ROKT ER0.45%
Strategy & risk
GALX tracks Global space-economy value chain with an industrials approach, while ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index.
GALX beta—
ROKT beta1.49
Fund details
GALX is managed by VistaShares (launched 07/15/2026) with $2.71M in assets. ROKT is managed by State Street (launched 10/19/2018) with $150M in assets.
GALX AUM$2.71M
ROKT AUM$150M
Frequently asked questions
Which of GALX or ROKT pays more dividend income?
ROKT currently reports a distribution yield, while GALX has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.
What is the difference between GALX and ROKT?
GALX (VistaShares Space Supercycle® ETF) tracks Global space-economy value chain with an industrials approach, while ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. They are issued by VistaShares and State Street respectively.
Can I hold both GALX and ROKT?
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
Which has lower fees, GALX or ROKT?
GALX has an expense ratio of 0.75% while ROKT charges 0.45%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.
How much income does $10,000 in GALX vs ROKT generate?
At current distribution rates, GALX has not established a distribution history yet, so a cash estimate is not available. $10,000 in ROKT would pay about $21.00 a year (about $5.25 per quarterly distribution).
Which has performed better historically, GALX or ROKT?
GALX has lagged ROKT over the year to date, posting a -19.34% total return against 9.76%. ROKT has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 26.9% against 34.6% for GALX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More comparisons to explore
People also compare GALX with
People also compare ROKT with
Popular comparisons
GALX vs ROKT — at a glance
Generated October 31, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
Overview
GALX and ROKT are both equity ETFs targeting the space economy, but they approach it differently. GALX actively invests across the broader space value chain—launch systems, satellite infrastructure, communications, and enabling technologies—globally. ROKT tracks a defined index of companies driving innovation in deep space and deep sea frontiers, offering a passive, index-based exposure with a narrower thematic focus. This structural gap translates into cost and liquidity profiles. ROKT charges 0.45%, a 30-basis-point advantage over GALX's 0.75%, and holds substantially larger assets at $150M versus $2.71M, giving it greater trading volume and price discovery. ROKT has published 1.49, indicating roughly 47% greater sensitivity to market moves relative to the broader market. GALX's recent launch—3 months—means limited performance data exists; ROKT, by comparison, has 8 years, providing a longer operating history for investors to evaluate.
Who each is best for
- GALX: Investors who believe active stock selection within the space economy creates value and are comfortable paying higher fees for manager discretion, even with a small asset base and limited track record to evaluate.
- ROKT: Investors seeking lower-cost, liquid exposure to deep-space and deep-sea innovation through a transparent, index-based approach, with an established fund history and quarterly distributions suited to periodic income or rebalancing needs.
Key risks to know
- Concentration in early-stage thematic companies. Both funds bet heavily on companies deriving revenue from space or frontier operations, a sector with unproven long-term profitability and regulatory uncertainty. Companies in early commercialization phases often operate at losses or razor-thin margins.
- High market sensitivity for ROKT. At 1.49, ROKT amplifies broad market moves; in a 10% market decline, the fund would historically fall approximately 14.7%, compounding losses during risk-off periods when thematic interest typically wanes.
- Limited operating history and track record for GALX. Without multi-year performance data, it is unclear how the fund's active process performs relative to index alternatives or whether manager selection adds measurable value net of fees in an emerging theme.
- Index concentration in ROKT. The S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index may overweight a small number of highly-traded space-economy names, increasing single-stock or sector-level volatility during revaluations or earnings disappointments.
Bottom line
If you value lower costs, established track record, and index-based transparency, ROKT's structure and 50 basis-point expense advantage align with that profile. If you prefer active management's flexibility to pursue opportunities beyond a fixed index and can tolerate higher fees and a smaller asset base, GALX's design reflects that orientation. Both carry thematic concentration and market-sensitivity risks; past performance does not predict future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.