DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

GPIX vs SPY: Monthly Income or the Full S&P 500?

A head-to-head of Goldman's S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF and the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust covering the overlay, cost, and structure.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • GPIXInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 8.54%, generated by selling options premium.
  • SPYInvestors who want simple, diversified core exposure in one low-cost fund.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

GPIX has outpaced SPY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 16.76% total return against 16.15%. Measured from Oct 2023 — the start of shared available history — SPY has compounded at 24.87% a year versus 22.46% for GPIX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Oct 2023Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
GPIX12.49%16.76%22.46%11.2%0.981.41-7.7%
SPY12.50%16.15%24.87%13.0%0.811.16-8.9%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Oct 2023” measures every fund from October 26, 2023 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricGPIXSPY
Full nameGoldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETFSPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
IssuerGoldman SachsState Street
Last Close$55.83 as of September 30, 2026$762.63 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate8.54%0.99%
Trailing 12-month yield8.16%0.99%
Distribution Safety Score™ 84100
Safety-Adjusted Yield 7.17%0.99%
Expense ratio0.29%0.0945%
AUM$5.97B$817B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyQuarterly
Underlying indexS&P 500S&P 500 Index
ObjectiveSeeks current income while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in companies included in the S&P 500 and selling call options with exposure to the benchmark.Track the S&P 500 Index before expenses.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/24/202301/22/1993
Beta0.85431.0
Last dividend$0.39738$1.88883
Ex-dividend date09/01/202609/18/2026

Bottom lineChoose GPIX if you want to maximize current income — roughly 8.54%, generated by selling options premium. Choose SPY if you want simple, diversified core exposure in one low-cost fund. There's no free lunch: GPIX's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while SPY keeps full price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. GPIX generates income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs48
Total AUM$68.9B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Goldman Sachs Asset Management is known for offering a comprehensive suite of ETFs spanning traditional and alternative investment strategies across multiple asset classes. The fund lineup encompasses income-focused offerings, factor-based strategies, thematic investments, ESG solutions, international exposure, commodities, bonds, and indexed products, reflecting a broad approach to meeting diverse investor needs. The issuer's portfolio demonstrates significant breadth, with funds serving income investors, factor-based strategists, and those seeking specialized exposure to emerging themes and alternative assets.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on GPIX.

ETFs179
Total AUM$2148B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) and SPY (SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

GPIX offers the higher yield at 8.54% vs 0.99% for SPY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SPY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.0945% compared to 0.29%.

They have different reference exposures: GPIX is linked to S&P 500 while SPY is linked to S&P 500 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SPY is the larger fund by assets ($817B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose GPIX

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — GPIX distributes roughly 8.54% from selling options premium, vs 0.99% for SPY.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Choose SPY

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

  • Want simple, diversified core exposure as a portfolio building block.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.0945% expense ratio vs 0.29% for GPIX.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, GPIX would generate roughly $71.17 cash per distribution, while SPY would produce $24.75 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

GPIX yield8.54%
SPY yield0.99%
Cash diff on $10K$46.42

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, GPIX would cost approximately $290 in fees vs $95 for SPY (simplified, not compounded). The $195.50 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

GPIX ER0.29%
SPY ER0.0945%

Strategy & risk

GPIX tracks S&P 500 with a covered call approach, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index with a large cap approach. Beta is 0.8543 for GPIX and 1.0 for SPY, making GPIX the less volatile of the two by this measure.

GPIX beta0.8543
SPY beta1.0

Fund details

GPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs (launched 10/24/2023) with $5.97B in assets. SPY is managed by State Street (launched 01/22/1993) with $817B in assets.

GPIX AUM$5.97B
SPY AUM$817B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between GPIX and SPY?

SPY (SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust) is the original S&P 500 ETF — a unit investment trust that tracks S&P 500 Index and keeps the whole move, paying 0.99% quarterly. GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) holds S&P 500 exposure and sells calls for monthly cash, which is why it distributes 8.54% and costs 0.29% against 0.0945%. In a sharp rally SPY keeps more upside. They share an index, not a job. Figures as of September 2026.

What is the current distribution rate for GPIX and SPY?

GPIX currently distributes 8.54% and SPY 0.99%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is GPIX or SPY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. GPIX currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both GPIX and SPY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is GPIX or SPY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — SPY scores 100, GPIX scores 84, so SPY's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, GPIX or SPY?

GPIX has an expense ratio of 0.29% while SPY charges 0.0945%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in GPIX vs SPY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in GPIX would generate roughly $71.17 cash per distribution ($854.00 annually). The same in SPY would produce about $24.75 cash per distribution ($99.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, GPIX or SPY?

GPIX has outpaced SPY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 16.76% total return against 16.15%. Measured from Oct 2023 — the start of shared available history — SPY has compounded at 24.87% a year versus 22.46% for GPIX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

GPIX vs SPY — at a glance

Generated September 26, 2026.

Overview

GPIX and SPY both track large-cap U.S. equities through the S&P 500, but they pursue fundamentally different income strategies. The key distinction is income generation method: SPY captures the market's dividend yield passively, whereas GPIX actively sells call options against its holdings to fund a substantially higher payout.

How they differ

GPIX's 8.54% distribution yield dwarfs SPY's 0.99%, but this income premium comes from option premiums, not underlying business earnings. GPIX sells call options with exposure to the S&P 500, which means its capital appreciation is capped when the market rallies—the trade-off for collecting option premium each month. SPY, by contrast, captures full upside through quarterly distributions tied to the index's dividend flow. GPIX's 0.8543 beta suggests its price moves less dramatically than the market, a mechanical effect of the short call position, while SPY's 1.0 beta reflects pure equity market sensitivity. On cost, SPY's 0.0945% expense ratio undercuts GPIX's 0.29%, though GPIX's higher ratio partly reflects the operational overhead of running an options overlay.

Who each is best for

GPIX: Investors seeking monthly income from a diversified large-cap equity base and willing to accept that their capital gains will be limited when the S&P 500 rallies sharply. The strategy appeals to those who value steady, predictable payouts over growth and who can tolerate the opportunity cost of capped appreciation in bull markets.

SPY: Investors building a core large-cap equity position who prioritize long-term capital appreciation and full market exposure, with income as a secondary benefit. The fund suits buy-and-hold allocators who want minimal fees and maximum simplicity, and those indifferent to when distributions arrive.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at elevated yields. GPIX's 8.54% distribution rate substantially exceeds the underlying S&P 500's dividend yield, suggesting distributions rely on return of capital or option premium depletion. Over time, if call option premiums compress or equity prices stagnate, the fund's net asset value is likely to drift downward.
  • Capped upside from short calls. GPIX's call-selling strategy automatically limits gains in a sustained bull market. Investors forgo outsized returns when equities surge, a structural drag that will underperform SPY in rising markets.
  • Options volatility and roll risk. GPIX must continuously roll its call positions to maintain exposure and income. If market volatility spikes or the fund's underlying holdings gap higher on news, rolling calls at profitable strikes becomes harder, potentially forcing lower premium collection or wider gaps between distributions.

Bottom line

If your goal is current income and you accept flat-to-down appreciation in exchange for steady monthly payouts, GPIX's covered-call structure is mechanically aligned with that priority. If you prioritize full market participation and long-term growth with lower fees, SPY's passive approach and far larger asset base make it the more traditional choice. Past performance doesn't predict future results, and the sustainability of GPIX's income depends on continued option premium availability and market conditions that may not persist.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.