DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

IVV vs VOO: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated May 20, 2026

ETFs44
Total AUM$3107.6B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

BlackRock is one of the world's largest asset managers and a major provider of ETFs across multiple investment strategies. The company's dividend-focused lineup emphasizes income-generating investments, with funds designed to deliver regular distributions to investors seeking yield. Their portfolio includes eight notable ETFs such as BALI (emerging markets income), DIVB (dividend equity), and DGRO (dividend growth), alongside complementary funds that span income, growth, and fixed-income strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IVV.

ETFs48
Total AUM$11763.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is known for offering low-cost, passively managed ETFs that serve as core portfolio holdings for individual investors. Their fund lineup emphasizes core equity exposure and dividend income strategies, with offerings spanning domestic growth (VGT, VUG), broad market indices (VOO), dividend-focused portfolios (VYM, VIG), and international high dividend yield opportunities (VONG, VYMI). The issuer's seven funds are characterized by expense ratios among the industry's lowest and a focus on long-term, buy-and-hold investors seeking diversified equity exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VOO.

Side-by-side snapshot

IVVVOO
Full nameiShares Core S&P 500 ETFVanguard S&P 500 ETF
IssuerBlackRockVanguard
Last Close$741.91 as of May 20, 2026$678.91 as of May 20, 2026
Distribution yield1.04%1.04%
Expense ratio0.03%0.03%
AUM$797.5B$1600.2B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Underlying indexS&P 500 IndexS&P 500 Index
ObjectiveSeeks to track the investment results of an index composed of large-capitalization U.S. equities, measuring the performance of the large-cap sector of the U.S. equity market as determined by S&P Dow Jones Indices.Track the performance of the S&P 500 Index, representing 500 of the largest U.S. companies.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date05/15/200009/07/2010
Beta1.01.0
Last dividend$1.78$1.87
Ex-dividend date03/17/202603/27/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years β€” no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

VOO is the larger fund by assets ($1600.2B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, IVV would generate roughly $8.67/month, while VOO would produce $8.67/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

IVV yield1.04%
VOO yield1.04%
Monthly diff on $10K$0.00

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, IVV would cost approximately $30 in fees vs $30 for VOO (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.

IVV ER0.03%
VOO ER0.03%

Strategy & risk

IVV tracks S&P 500 Index with a basket approach, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index using a large cap strategy.

IVV beta1.0
VOO beta1.0

Fund details

IVV is managed by BlackRock (launched 05/15/2000) with $797.5B in assets. VOO is managed by Vanguard (launched 09/07/2010) with $1600.2B in assets.

IVV AUM$797.5B
VOO AUM$1600.2B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor β€” if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is IVV or VOO better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. IVV currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between IVV and VOO?

IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index with a basket strategy, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index with a large cap approach. They are issued by BlackRock and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both IVV and VOO?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, IVV or VOO?

IVV and VOO both charge the same expense ratio of 0.03%, so neither is cheaper on fees β€” pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.

How much income does $10,000 in IVV vs VOO generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in IVV would generate roughly $8.67 per month ($104.00 annually). The same in VOO would produce about $8.67 per month ($104.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

IVV vs VOO β€” at a glance

Generated April 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

IVV and VOO are both passively managed ETFs that track the S&P 500 Index, holding the same 500 large-cap U.S. stocks. The key distinction is size: VOO is roughly twice as large by assets under management ($1.42 trillion vs. $721 billion), which gives it a structural advantage in trading efficiency and fee sustainability. Both charge an identical 0.03% expense ratio and distribute dividends quarterly.

How they differ

The first and most material difference is scale. VOO's $1.42 trillion in AUM versus IVV's $721 billion means VOO likely benefits from tighter bid-ask spreads and lower trading costs at the marginβ€”a real advantage for large positions or frequent traders, though negligible for buy-and-hold investors. Second, their distributions are nearly identical: IVV yields 1.10% and VOO yields 1.09%, with both paying quarterly. IVV has a longer track record (inception May 2000 vs. September 2010), but that historical depth offers little practical value given that both track an identical index. Third, both charge 0.03% in expenses, so cost is a genuine tie.

Who each is best for

IVV: Investors who already hold other BlackRock iShares products and value consolidated reporting, or those indifferent to fund family and prioritizing a slightly longer fund history (though this carries negligible real-world benefit).

VOO: Vanguard clients who value integration with existing Vanguard holdings, or larger institutional and retail investors where VOO's greater liquidity and AUM provide a marginal edge in execution quality.

Key risks to know

  • Index concentration risk: Both funds are heavily weighted toward the "Magnificent Seven" and other mega-cap tech stocks, meaning they underperform in value-rotations or technology downturns.
  • Market risk: A 1.0 beta means these funds move in lockstep with broad market volatility. In a 20% S&P 500 decline, both should fall similarly.
  • Tracking error from cash drag: Minimal but realβ€”both funds hold small cash balances that temporarily lag index performance on market rallies.
  • Dividend tax drag: Quarterly distributions create tax-reporting complexity in taxable accounts and trigger short-term gains if reinvested; best held in tax-advantaged accounts for long-term holders.

Bottom line

These funds are functionally interchangeable for most investors. If you value maximum liquidity and belong to Vanguard, VOO's larger size edges ahead; if you're a BlackRock/iShares ecosystem user, IVV works equally well. The 0.03% expense ratio and 1.09–1.10% yield are so close that fund choice should hinge on account custody and existing relationships, not performance expectations. Past performance doesn't predict future results, and both will track the S&P 500 with near-perfect fidelity going forward.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.