DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

IVV vs SPY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 2, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

IVV has outpaced SPY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 16.43% total return against 16.38%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: IVV has compounded at 15.45% a year, against 15.37% for SPY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince May 2000Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
IVV13.60%16.43%23.23%13.70%15.45%8.61%14.9%1.101.60-18.8%
SPY13.54%16.38%23.14%13.63%15.37%8.55%15.2%1.081.57-18.8%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since May 2000” measures every fund from May 19, 2000 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricIVVSPY
Full nameiShares Core S&P 500 ETFSPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
IssueriSharesState Street
Last Close$773.10 as of October 2, 2026$769.64 as of October 2, 2026
Distribution rate1.14%0.98%
Trailing 12-month yield1.09%0.99%
Distribution Safety Score™ 100100
Safety-Adjusted Yield 1.14%0.98%
Expense ratio0.03%0.0945%
AUM$888B$817B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Underlying indexS&P 500 IndexS&P 500 Index
ObjectiveSeeks to track the investment results of an index composed of large-capitalization U.S. equities, measuring the performance of the large-cap sector of the U.S. equity market as determined by S&P Dow Jones Indices.Track the S&P 500 Index before expenses.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date05/15/200001/22/1993
Beta1.01.0
Last dividend$2.20261$1.88883
Ex-dividend date09/15/202609/18/2026

Bottom lineIVV and SPY are nearly interchangeable — both track the S&P 500 with very similar cost and risk. The clearest tie-breaker is cost: IVV is cheaper at 0.03% vs 0.0945%.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs466
Total AUM$4683B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IVV.

ETFs179
Total AUM$2146B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and SPY (SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

IVV offers the higher yield at 1.14% vs 0.98% for SPY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

IVV is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.03% compared to 0.0945%.

IVV is the larger fund by assets ($888B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, IVV would generate roughly $28.50 cash per distribution, while SPY would produce $24.50 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

IVV yield1.14%
SPY yield0.98%
Cash diff on $10K$4.00

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, IVV would cost approximately $30 in fees vs $95 for SPY (simplified, not compounded). The $64.50 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

IVV ER0.03%
SPY ER0.0945%

Strategy & risk

IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index with a large cap approach.

IVV beta1.0
SPY beta1.0

Fund details

IVV is managed by iShares (launched 05/15/2000) with $888B in assets. SPY is managed by State Street (launched 01/22/1993) with $817B in assets.

IVV AUM$888B
SPY AUM$817B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for IVV and SPY?

IVV currently distributes 1.14% and SPY 0.98%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is IVV or SPY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. IVV currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between IVV and SPY?

IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPY (SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust) tracks S&P 500 Index with a large cap approach. They are issued by iShares and State Street respectively.

Can I hold both IVV and SPY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is IVV or SPY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: IVV scores 100, SPY scores 100. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, IVV or SPY?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SPY charges 0.0945%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in IVV vs SPY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in IVV would generate roughly $28.50 cash per distribution ($114.00 annually). The same in SPY would produce about $24.50 cash per distribution ($98.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, IVV or SPY?

IVV has outpaced SPY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 16.43% total return against 16.38%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: IVV has compounded at 15.45% a year, against 15.37% for SPY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

IVV vs SPY — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Overview

IVV and SPY are both ETFs that track the S&P 500 Index, holding the same 500 large-cap U.S. companies in nearly identical weights. The key distinction is cost: IVV charges 0.03%, while SPY charges 0.0945% — a gap that compounds over decades despite both funds holding effectively identical underlying exposure.

How they differ

The main difference is the expense ratio. IVV's 0.03% fee is roughly 63 basis points cheaper than SPY's 0.0945%, a material advantage for long-term holders. Both distribute quarterly, but IVV yields 1.14% versus SPY's 0.98%, a difference likely driven by minor tax-efficiency variations or cash-drag timing rather than strategy divergence. SPY is the older fund (inception 01/22/1993) and benefits from longer brand recognition, while IVV launched 05/15/2000, arriving when ETFs were already established.

Who each is best for

  • IVV: Fits buy-and-hold investors prioritizing the lowest ongoing cost drag over a 20+ year horizon, where even small fee differences accumulate into meaningful capital preservation.
  • SPY: Fits investors who value the largest ecosystem of options strategies, futures contracts, and third-party financial products built around the ticker, or those indifferent to a ~6 basis-point fee premium.

Key risks to know

  • Index concentration: Both funds hold 500 names but remain heavily weighted toward mega-cap tech and finance — a single sector downturn or regulatory shock can ripple through the entire portfolio.
  • Fee drag over time: SPY's higher expense ratio, though modest in absolute terms, compounds to meaningful underperformance versus IVV over 30+ years, even before any price-per-share divergence.
  • Tracking error from cash: Both ETFs hold small cash positions and incur trading costs, meaning neither will perfectly match the S&P 500's daily return; IVV's lower fee ratio gives it a marginal edge in closing that gap.

Bottom line

If you're building a core large-cap equity position and plan to hold for decades, IVV's 0.03% expense ratio offers a cleaner math story than SPY's 0.0945%. If you actively trade options or rely on SPY-linked derivatives for hedging, SPY's established ecosystem may justify staying put. Past performance does not predict future results; both will track the broader market's ups and downs within their stated fee bands.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.