DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

JEPQ vs MSTY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF and YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated September 4, 2026

Best for

  • JEPQInvestors who are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.
  • MSTYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 68.32%, generated by selling options premium.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

JEPQ has outpaced MSTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 20.21% total return against -51.78%. Measured from Feb 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — MSTY has compounded at 20.71% a year versus 16.93% for JEPQ. JEPQ has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 14.7% against 67.7% for MSTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1YSince Feb 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
JEPQ10.39%20.21%16.93%14.7%0.941.33-8.8%
MSTY-9.07%-51.78%20.71%67.7%-1.14-1.56-71.9%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 4, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since Feb 2024” measures every fund from February 22, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricJEPQMSTY
Full nameJPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETFYieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerJPMorganYieldMax
Underlying indexNasdaq-100Strategy (MSTR)
Last Close$59.87 as of September 4, 2026$16.06 as of September 4, 2026
Distribution rate13.68%68.32%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9059
Safety-Adjusted Yield 12.31%40.31%
Expense ratio0.35%1.03%
AUM$41.9B$1.02B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyWeekly
ObjectiveSeeks monthly income by combining an actively managed portfolio of equities drawn largely from the Nasdaq-100 Index with equity-linked notes that sell call options on that benchmark.Actively managed fund that seeks current income while maintaining indirect exposure to the share price of MicroStrategy Incorporated (MSTR), subject to a limit on potential investment gains.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date05/03/202202/21/2024
Beta0.812.5604
Last dividend$0.6825$0.211 payable today
Ex-dividend date09/01/202609/03/2026

Bottom lineChoose JEPQ if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout. Choose MSTY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 68.32%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: MSTY's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while JEPQ keeps full price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. JEPQ and MSTY generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs78
Total AUM$347B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

JPMorgan is a major provider of ETFs spanning multiple asset classes and strategies, with particular strength in income-focused funds including their popular covered call strategy lineup. Their fund family encompasses broad categories including bond, equity, factor, income, index, international, municipal, and sector ETFs, providing investors with diverse exposure options across markets and investment styles. The issuer offers both core indexed strategies and actively managed solutions, serving investors seeking everything from traditional dividend income to sophisticated factor-based and thematic approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on JEPQ.

ETFs61
Total AUM$9.75B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MSTY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

MSTY offers the higher yield at 68.32% vs 13.68% for JEPQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

JEPQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.35% compared to 1.03%.

They have different reference exposures: JEPQ is linked to Nasdaq-100 while MSTY is linked to Strategy (MSTR), which means their performance drivers differ.

JEPQ is the larger fund by assets ($41.9B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose JEPQ

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF

  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.35% expense ratio vs 1.03% for MSTY.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.8 vs 2.6 for MSTY.

Choose MSTY

YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — MSTY distributes roughly 68.32% from selling options premium, vs 13.68% for JEPQ.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, JEPQ would generate roughly $114.00/month, while MSTY would produce $569.33/month, at current distribution rates.

JEPQ yield13.68%
MSTY yield68.32%
Monthly diff on $10K$455.33

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, JEPQ would cost approximately $350 in fees vs $1,030 for MSTY (simplified, not compounded). The $680.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

JEPQ ER0.35%
MSTY ER1.03%

Strategy & risk

JEPQ is actively managed around Nasdaq-100 exposure with an active approach, while MSTY is actively managed around Strategy (MSTR) exposure with a crypto approach. Beta is 0.81 for JEPQ and 2.5604 for MSTY, making JEPQ the less volatile of the two by this measure.

JEPQ beta0.81
MSTY beta2.5604

Fund details

JEPQ is managed by JPMorgan (launched 05/03/2022) with $41.9B in assets. MSTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 02/21/2024) with $1.02B in assets.

JEPQ AUM$41.9B
MSTY AUM$1.02B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for JEPQ and MSTY?

JEPQ currently distributes 13.68% and MSTY 68.32%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is JEPQ or MSTY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. MSTY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between JEPQ and MSTY?

JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is actively managed around Nasdaq-100 exposure with an active approach, while MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) is actively managed around Strategy (MSTR) exposure with a crypto approach. They are issued by JPMorgan and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both JEPQ and MSTY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is JEPQ or MSTY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — JEPQ scores 90, MSTY scores 59, so JEPQ's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. JEPQ has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.81 vs 2.56 for MSTY). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, JEPQ or MSTY?

JEPQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while MSTY charges 1.03%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in JEPQ vs MSTY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in JEPQ would generate roughly $114.00 per month ($1,368.00 annually). The same in MSTY would produce about $569.33 per month ($6,832.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, JEPQ or MSTY?

JEPQ has outpaced MSTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 20.21% total return against -51.78%. Measured from Feb 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — MSTY has compounded at 20.71% a year versus 16.93% for JEPQ. JEPQ has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 14.7% against 67.7% for MSTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

JEPQ vs MSTY — at a glance

Generated September 5, 2026.

Overview

JEPQ and MSTY are both options-overlay ETFs that generate income by selling call options on their underlying holdings, but they operate on fundamentally different scales of leverage and concentration. JEPQ pairs an actively managed Nasdaq-100 portfolio with a systematic covered-call strategy to produce 13.68% yield monthly. MSTY takes a far more aggressive approach, selling calls against a single stock—MicroStrategy—to produce a 68.32% yield distributed weekly. The difference in construction reflects a stark gap in risk: diversified index overlay versus single-name, high-beta leverage.

How they differ

The defining difference is scope: JEPQ holds a diversified equity portfolio aligned with the Nasdaq-100, while MSTY concentrates all capital into calls on a single volatile stock (MicroStrategy, with a beta of 2.5604). This choice cascades into yield and risk. JEPQ, with $41.9B, benefits from institutional scale; MSTY, at $1.02B, operates at a fraction of that size and is a younger fund (inception 02/21/2024). JEPQ's beta of 0.81 suggests dampened equity swings relative to its underlying index, whereas MSTY's 2.5604 beta indicates it amplifies moves in the single name it holds.

Who each is best for

JEPQ: Fits investors seeking steady monthly income from a diversified Nasdaq-focused core, who are comfortable with a ~14% yield but prioritize index-level diversification and a lower fee footprint.

MSTY: Fits investors with high risk tolerance and a strong conviction on MicroStrategy's trajectory, who are willing to accept single-name concentration, higher fees, and weekly distribution mechanics in exchange for an ultra-high yield.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at yields above 15%. JEPQ's 13.68% yield and MSTY's 68.32% yield both rely on option income to supplement equity returns. If the Nasdaq-100 or MicroStrategy decline, or if realized volatility falls and call premiums compress, distributions will likely draw increasingly on return of capital, eroding NAV over time.
  • Single-name concentration and beta amplification (MSTY). MSTY holds only MicroStrategy calls, concentrating all risk into a cryptocurrency-adjacent software company with a beta of 2.5604. A drawdown in MSTR or crypto sentiment can trigger sharp losses with no diversification buffer; price swings will be exaggerated relative to the broader market.
  • Call cap limiting upside (both). By selling calls, both funds cap their capital appreciation. If the Nasdaq-100 or MSTR rallies sharply, unit holders will miss outsized gains; shares may trade at a discount to NAV as investors recognize the capped potential.
  • Options volatility and roll risk (both). As implied volatility falls, option premiums shrink, forcing the funds to sell shorter-duration or tighter-strike calls to maintain yield targets. This compounds NAV pressure and increases assignment risk, potentially forcing liquidation at unfavorable prices.

Bottom line

If you want a monthly income stream backed by diversified Nasdaq exposure and lower fees, JEPQ's 13.68% yield and $41.9B scale offer a more sustainable structure. If you're drawn to extreme yield and have conviction on MicroStrategy's path, MSTY's 68.32% payout comes with single-name risk, higher costs, and heightened NAV-erosion exposure that demands active monitoring. Both funds' high yields rest on option strategies that are vulnerable to volatility compression and market downturns; past performance does not guarantee these distributions will persist.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.