DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

MSTY vs ULTY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated May 20, 2026

ETFs62
Total AUM$9.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax specializes in options-based and income-focused ETFs, leveraging covered call and short option strategies to generate high distribution yields for investors seeking regular income. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 61 ETFs organized across nine fund families, including prominent strategies like 0DTE (zero days-to-expiration) options, covered calls, and target distribution approaches, alongside more traditional performance and portfolio-based offerings. YieldMax's holdings span major technology and financial names—including tickers like AMZY, APLY, BRKC, and FBY—and the firm targets both individual investors and those seeking enhanced yield through systematic options strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MSTY and ULTY.

Side-by-side snapshot

MSTYULTY
Full nameYieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETFYieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Last Close$23.81 as of May 20, 2026$31.12 as of May 20, 2026
Distribution yield115.42%67.51%
Expense ratio1.03%1.30%
AUM$1.2B$855M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
Underlying indexStrategy (MSTR)Basket (High Volatility stocks)
ObjectiveCovered CallCovered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date07/18/202302/21/2024
Last dividend$0.54$0.41
Ex-dividend date05/14/202605/13/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

MSTY offers the higher yield at 115.42% vs 67.51% for ULTY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

MSTY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 1.03% compared to 1.30%.

They track different benchmarks: MSTY is linked to Strategy (MSTR) while ULTY tracks Basket (High Volatility stocks), which means their performance drivers differ.

MSTY is the larger fund by assets ($1.2B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, MSTY would generate roughly $961.83/month, while ULTY would produce $562.58/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

MSTY yield115.42%
ULTY yield67.51%
Monthly diff on $10K$399.25

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, MSTY would cost approximately $1,030 in fees vs $1,300 for ULTY (simplified, not compounded). The $270.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

MSTY ER1.03%
ULTY ER1.30%

Strategy & risk

MSTY tracks Strategy (MSTR) with a covered call approach, while ULTY tracks Basket (High Volatility stocks) using a covered call strategy.

Fund details

MSTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 07/18/2023) with $1.2B in assets. ULTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 02/21/2024) with $855M in assets.

MSTY AUM$1.2B
ULTY AUM$855M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is MSTY or ULTY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. MSTY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between MSTY and ULTY?

MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Strategy (MSTR) with a covered call strategy, while ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Basket (High Volatility stocks) with a covered call approach. They are issued by YieldMax and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both MSTY and ULTY?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, MSTY or ULTY?

MSTY has an expense ratio of 1.03% while ULTY charges 1.30%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in MSTY vs ULTY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in MSTY would generate roughly $961.83 per month ($11,542.00 annually). The same in ULTY would produce about $562.58 per month ($6,751.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

MSTY vs ULTY — at a glance

Generated April 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

MSTY and ULTY are both weekly-paying covered call ETFs from YieldMax that harvest options premiums to generate 67–71% distribution yields. The crucial difference: MSTY is a single-stock play tied entirely to MicroStrategy (MSTR), a Bitcoin-heavy software company, while ULTY spreads its exposure across a basket of high-volatility equities. Both use derivatives to cap upside in exchange for income, and both report zero beta—meaning the option overlay is intended to dampen price swings relative to their underlying holdings.

How they differ

MSTY's monolithic bet on MSTR makes it a concentrated crypto-proxy play, whereas ULTY diversifies across multiple high-volatility names. This is the first-order split: if MSTR rallies or crashes, MSTY moves with it almost dollar-for-dollar on that day; ULTY's basket smooths individual stock shocks. Second, MSTY yields 70.51% versus ULTY's 67.48%—a modest difference that reflects MSTR's outsized volatility premium. MSTY's expense ratio is 1.03%, 27 basis points cheaper than ULTY's 1.30%. Finally, MSTY has nearly twice the AUM ($1.05 billion versus $873 million) and a longer track record (nearly three years old versus just over one), suggesting more liquidity and established operational proof.

Who each is best for

MSTY: Investors with high risk tolerance who believe in MSTR's long-term direction and want to monetize its volatility through weekly income; best held in taxable accounts where the weekly distributions can be managed tax-efficiently, or in IRAs where distribution frequency is irrelevant.

ULTY: Traders seeking high-volatility income without single-stock concentration risk; those willing to accept a slightly lower yield and higher fees in exchange for portfolio diversification; suitable for risk-aware income seekers who want optionality across multiple growth equities.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion from high distributions: Both funds' 67–71% yields likely rely on return-of-capital treatment—meaning NAV will compress over time as option premiums and underlying gains are paid out faster than new capital arrives or securities appreciate.
  • Covered call cap on upside: The option overlay caps gains. If MSTR or the underlying basket rally sharply, MSTY and ULTY shareholders forfeit those profits; the weekly call roll limits participation in bull moves.
  • Concentration risk in MSTY: A single bet on MSTR exposes MSTY to company-specific operational, regulatory, or market sentiment shocks with no portfolio offset. MSTR's 52-week range ($19–$127) underscores this volatility.
  • Volatility decay and option mispricing: Both funds depend on sustained high implied volatility to justify their premium collection. If implied volatility contracts, premium income falls, pressuring yields and potentially forcing higher portfolio turnover.
  • Weekly distribution tax drag: Weekly payouts in taxable accounts trigger frequent taxable events and reinvestment friction. This is especially punitive in high-frequency covered-call structures.

Bottom line

If you're comfortable with extreme single-stock volatility and believe in MSTR's crypto-linked thesis, MSTY's slightly higher yield and lower fees may justify the concentration risk. If you want similar weekly income without a single point of failure, ULTY's basket approach and established track record offer more breathing room—at the cost of a lower yield and higher expenses. Both funds depend on sustained options premiums, which means NAV erosion is likely if volatility normalizes. Past performance, particularly over their short lives during a volatile crypto cycle, does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.