PLTY
High risk
High confidence
ETF Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated November 6, 2026
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.
Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.
An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.
High risk
High confidence
High risk
High confidence
Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Full name | YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF |
| Issuer | YieldMax | YieldMax |
| Underlying index | Palantir (PLTR) | Tesla (TSLA) |
| Last Close | $29.65 as of November 6, 2026 | $20.03 as of November 6, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | 39.34% | 56.41% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 83.99% | 84.43% |
| 30-day SEC yield | 2.60% | 3.01% |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | 17 | 15 |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | 6.69% | 8.46% |
| Expense ratio | 1.07% | 1.07% |
| AUM | $339M | $659M |
| Distribution frequency | Weekly | Weekly |
| Objective | Seeks current income and indirect exposure to the share price of Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR), investing at least 80% of net assets in securities and financial instruments providing that exposure. | YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF seeks current income while providing indirect exposure to the share price returns of Tesla, Inc. common stock, subject to a limit on potential investment gains. The fund does not invest directly in Tesla, Inc.; it uses a synthetic covered call strategy built from standardized exchange-traded options. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | 10/07/2024 | 11/22/2022 |
| Beta | 1.802 | 1.44 |
| Last dividend | $0.2243 payable 11/06/2026 | $0.2173 payable 11/06/2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | 11/05/2026 | 11/05/2026 |
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
PLTY has outpaced TSLY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -15.21% total return against -22.84%. Measured from Oct 2024 — the start of shared available history — PLTY has compounded at 53.27% a year versus 11.80% for TSLY. TSLY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 39.2% against 51.5% for PLTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | 1Y cumulative | Since Oct 2024 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLTY | -9.17% | -15.21% | 53.27% | 51.5% | -0.40 | -0.59 | -38.0% |
| TSLY | -21.18% | -22.84% | 11.80% | 39.2% | -0.77 | -0.97 | -31.3% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Oct 2024” measures every fund from October 8, 2024 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
| Metric | PLTY | TSLY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward distribution rate | 39.34% | 56.41% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 83.99% | 84.43% |
| 30-day SEC yield | 2.60% | 3.01% |
| Return of capital | 94.46% | 100.00% |
Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.
Total return against the stated underlying is on PLTY vs PLTR, TSLY vs TSLA.
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Bottom lineChoose PLTY if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout. Choose TSLY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 56.41%, generated by selling options premium. PLTY and TSLY both use option or derivative overlays. Their tradeoff is the underlying exposure, how each option strategy is implemented, and the yield each targets; either overlay can limit upside participation, so neither offers uncapped price exposure.
Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.
Learn the mechanics: Return of capital, explained · NAV erosion, explained
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on PLTY and TSLY.
PLTY (YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.
TSLY offers the higher yield at 56.41% vs 39.34% for PLTY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.
They have different reference exposures: PLTY is linked to Palantir (PLTR) while TSLY is linked to Tesla (TSLA), which means their performance drivers differ.
TSLY is the larger fund by assets ($659M), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.
On a $10,000 investment at current distribution rates, PLTY would pay about $3,934.00 a year (about $75.65 per weekly distribution), while TSLY would pay about $5,641.00 a year (about $108.48 per weekly distribution). Both pay weekly distributions.
Over 10 years on $10,000, PLTY would cost approximately $1,070 in fees vs $1,070 for TSLY (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.
PLTY tracks Palantir (PLTR) with a covered call approach, while TSLY uses Tesla (TSLA) as its reference exposure with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.802 for PLTY and 1.44 for TSLY, making TSLY the less sensitive to market moves of the two by this measure.
PLTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 10/07/2024) with $339M in assets. TSLY is managed by YieldMax (launched 11/22/2022) with $659M in assets.
PLTY currently distributes 39.34% and TSLY 56.41%, based on fund data updated November 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.
It depends on your goals. TSLY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
PLTY (YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Palantir (PLTR) with a covered call approach, while TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) uses Tesla (TSLA) as its reference exposure with a covered call approach. They are issued by YieldMax and YieldMax respectively.
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: PLTY scores 17, TSLY scores 15. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. TSLY has also been less sensitive to market moves (beta 1.44 vs 1.80 for PLTY). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.
PLTY and TSLY both charge the same expense ratio of 1.07%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.
At current distribution rates, $10,000 in PLTY would pay about $3,934.00 a year (about $75.65 per weekly distribution). $10,000 in TSLY would pay about $5,641.00 a year (about $108.48 per weekly distribution).
PLTY has outpaced TSLY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -15.21% total return against -22.84%. Measured from Oct 2024 — the start of shared available history — PLTY has compounded at 53.27% a year versus 11.80% for TSLY. TSLY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 39.2% against 51.5% for PLTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Generated October 31, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
PLTY and TSLY are both YieldMax ETFs that generate income through synthetic covered call strategies on single stocks—Palantir and Tesla, respectively. They distribute weekly and target high current yields by selling upside on their underlying holdings. The key distinction is their underlying asset: PLTY tracks a semiconductor/defense software company with a beta of 1.802, while TSLY tracks an electric-vehicle manufacturer with a beta of 1.57. Both launched as YieldMax's signature income-overlay product, but TSLY has been operating since 11/22/2022 while PLTY is much newer, having launched 10/07/2024.
Both funds employ identical synthetic covered call mechanics and charge the same 1.07% expense ratio, making their structural costs equivalent. That higher yield on TSLY reflects tighter option premiums relative to Tesla's price; PLTY's newer launch and smaller $339M asset base may explain why its yield sits higher despite identical mechanics. On volatility, PLTY's 1.802 beta exceeds TSLY's 1.44, indicating Palantir stock moves more sharply with broad equities—a meaningful difference for investors sensitive to drawdowns.
If you prioritize current income and can tolerate high volatility and capped appreciation on a single stock, PLTY offers a 17.07 percentage-point yield edge over TSLY. If you want an established fund with lower beta (1.44 vs. 1.802), deeper liquidity, and a proven track record since 11/22/2022, TSLY presents a more settled alternative, though at a 56.41% yield. Both carry the structural risk that distributions this high tend to erode principal over time—neither is a true replacement for total-return investing. Past performance does not predict future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.