DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

PLTY vs TSLY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated November 6, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • PLTYInvestors who are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.
  • TSLYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 56.41%, generated by selling options premium.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Price and total return

Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.

Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.

Distribution Safety Score

An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.

PLTY

17/ 100

High risk

High confidence

TSLY

15/ 100

High risk

High confidence

Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricPLTYTSLY
Full nameYieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETFYieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Underlying indexPalantir (PLTR)Tesla (TSLA)
Last Close$29.65 as of November 6, 2026$20.03 as of November 6, 2026
Distribution rate39.34%56.41%
Trailing 12-month yield83.99%84.43%
30-day SEC yield2.60%3.01%
Distribution Safety Score™ 1715
Safety-Adjusted Yield 6.69%8.46%
Expense ratio1.07%1.07%
AUM$339M$659M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
ObjectiveSeeks current income and indirect exposure to the share price of Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR), investing at least 80% of net assets in securities and financial instruments providing that exposure.YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF seeks current income while providing indirect exposure to the share price returns of Tesla, Inc. common stock, subject to a limit on potential investment gains. The fund does not invest directly in Tesla, Inc.; it uses a synthetic covered call strategy built from standardized exchange-traded options.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/07/202411/22/2022
Beta1.8021.44
Last dividend$0.2243 payable 11/06/2026$0.2173 payable 11/06/2026
Ex-dividend date11/05/202611/05/2026

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

PLTY has outpaced TSLY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -15.21% total return against -22.84%. Measured from Oct 2024 — the start of shared available history — PLTY has compounded at 53.27% a year versus 11.80% for TSLY. TSLY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 39.2% against 51.5% for PLTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Oct 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
PLTY-9.17%-15.21%53.27%51.5%-0.40-0.59-38.0%
TSLY-21.18%-22.84%11.80%39.2%-0.77-0.97-31.3%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Oct 2024” measures every fund from October 8, 2024 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Distribution rate, SEC yield and return of capital

MetricPLTYTSLY
Forward distribution rate39.34%56.41%
Trailing 12-month yield83.99%84.43%
30-day SEC yield2.60%3.01%
Return of capital94.46%100.00%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Total return against the stated underlying is on PLTY vs PLTR, TSLY vs TSLA.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Bottom lineChoose PLTY if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout. Choose TSLY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 56.41%, generated by selling options premium. PLTY and TSLY both use option or derivative overlays. Their tradeoff is the underlying exposure, how each option strategy is implemented, and the yield each targets; either overlay can limit upside participation, so neither offers uncapped price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. PLTY and TSLY generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs63
Total AUM$9.06B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on PLTY and TSLY.

Quick verdict

PLTY (YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

TSLY offers the higher yield at 56.41% vs 39.34% for PLTY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

They have different reference exposures: PLTY is linked to Palantir (PLTR) while TSLY is linked to Tesla (TSLA), which means their performance drivers differ.

TSLY is the larger fund by assets ($659M), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment at current distribution rates, PLTY would pay about $3,934.00 a year (about $75.65 per weekly distribution), while TSLY would pay about $5,641.00 a year (about $108.48 per weekly distribution). Both pay weekly distributions.

PLTY yield39.34%
TSLY yield56.41%
Annual cash diff on $10K$1,707.00

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, PLTY would cost approximately $1,070 in fees vs $1,070 for TSLY (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.

PLTY ER1.07%
TSLY ER1.07%

Strategy & risk

PLTY tracks Palantir (PLTR) with a covered call approach, while TSLY uses Tesla (TSLA) as its reference exposure with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.802 for PLTY and 1.44 for TSLY, making TSLY the less sensitive to market moves of the two by this measure.

PLTY beta1.802
TSLY beta1.44

Fund details

PLTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 10/07/2024) with $339M in assets. TSLY is managed by YieldMax (launched 11/22/2022) with $659M in assets.

PLTY AUM$339M
TSLY AUM$659M

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for PLTY and TSLY?

PLTY currently distributes 39.34% and TSLY 56.41%, based on fund data updated November 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is PLTY or TSLY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. TSLY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between PLTY and TSLY?

PLTY (YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Palantir (PLTR) with a covered call approach, while TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) uses Tesla (TSLA) as its reference exposure with a covered call approach. They are issued by YieldMax and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both PLTY and TSLY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is PLTY or TSLY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: PLTY scores 17, TSLY scores 15. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. TSLY has also been less sensitive to market moves (beta 1.44 vs 1.80 for PLTY). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, PLTY or TSLY?

PLTY and TSLY both charge the same expense ratio of 1.07%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.

How much income does $10,000 in PLTY vs TSLY generate?

At current distribution rates, $10,000 in PLTY would pay about $3,934.00 a year (about $75.65 per weekly distribution). $10,000 in TSLY would pay about $5,641.00 a year (about $108.48 per weekly distribution).

Which has performed better historically, PLTY or TSLY?

PLTY has outpaced TSLY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -15.21% total return against -22.84%. Measured from Oct 2024 — the start of shared available history — PLTY has compounded at 53.27% a year versus 11.80% for TSLY. TSLY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 39.2% against 51.5% for PLTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

PLTY vs TSLY — at a glance

Generated October 31, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

PLTY and TSLY are both YieldMax ETFs that generate income through synthetic covered call strategies on single stocks—Palantir and Tesla, respectively. They distribute weekly and target high current yields by selling upside on their underlying holdings. The key distinction is their underlying asset: PLTY tracks a semiconductor/defense software company with a beta of 1.802, while TSLY tracks an electric-vehicle manufacturer with a beta of 1.57. Both launched as YieldMax's signature income-overlay product, but TSLY has been operating since 11/22/2022 while PLTY is much newer, having launched 10/07/2024.

How they differ

Both funds employ identical synthetic covered call mechanics and charge the same 1.07% expense ratio, making their structural costs equivalent. That higher yield on TSLY reflects tighter option premiums relative to Tesla's price; PLTY's newer launch and smaller $339M asset base may explain why its yield sits higher despite identical mechanics. On volatility, PLTY's 1.802 beta exceeds TSLY's 1.44, indicating Palantir stock moves more sharply with broad equities—a meaningful difference for investors sensitive to drawdowns.

Who each is best for

  • PLTY: Fits investors seeking maximum current income from a concentrated, high-beta technology position who accept significant drawdown risk and can tolerate capped upside on Palantir shares.
  • TSLY: Designed for income-focused investors comfortable with a capped-return structure on Tesla exposure who prefer an established fund with higher assets and lower volatility relative to PLTY's underlying.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yields. Both funds distribute well above 40% annually, a level historically associated with accelerating principal decay unless underlying stock appreciation substantially offsets it. PLTY's 39.34% yield is particularly aggressive for a stock with 1.802 beta exposure.
  • Capped upside from covered calls. Both strategies systematically sell away gains above the call strike; shareholders participate in declines but forfeit outsized rallies. This is most painful during bull runs in the underlying—a Palantir or Tesla surge leaves holders with fixed returns while the stock climbs further.
  • Single-stock concentration and sector correlation. PLTY is entirely exposed to Palantir (defense software, cyclical demand), while TSLY is entirely exposed to Tesla (automotive, energy, macro-sensitive). No diversification cushions sector downturns or company-specific risks; a deterioration in either business directly erodes the fund's value.
  • Weekly reset optionality risk. Weekly-rolled calls mean the funds must continuously roll positions into fresh strikes. If volatility compresses or the underlying gaps sharply, rolling at target premiums becomes difficult, forcing lower strikes or distribution cuts.
  • Beta and leverage interaction. PLTY's 1.802 beta amplifies both upside and downside moves; combined with yield harvesting at 39.34%, it creates a scenario where principal erosion accelerates during market stress.

Bottom line

If you prioritize current income and can tolerate high volatility and capped appreciation on a single stock, PLTY offers a 17.07 percentage-point yield edge over TSLY. If you want an established fund with lower beta (1.44 vs. 1.802), deeper liquidity, and a proven track record since 11/22/2022, TSLY presents a more settled alternative, though at a 56.41% yield. Both carry the structural risk that distributions this high tend to erode principal over time—neither is a true replacement for total-return investing. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Continue your research

Tracking requires a free account. Account features · Plans.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.