DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

QQQ vs QYLD: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Invesco QQQ Trust and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

ETFs255
Total AUM$971B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major player in the ETF space known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of 71 funds spanning multiple investment themes and strategies. Their portfolio spans income-focused funds, factor-based equity strategies, commodity exposure, digital assets, ESG investing, and the popular Invesco QQQ family tracking the Nasdaq-100, serving both income-seeking and growth-oriented investors. The issuer is particularly recognized for specialized offerings like BulletShares (laddered bond funds), sector rotation strategies, and thematic investing options, making it a comprehensive choice for investors seeking varied exposures beyond traditional index funds.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQ.

ETFs123
Total AUM$98.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Global X is known for developing thematic and alternative investment ETFs with a strong emphasis on income-generating strategies. Their 37-fund lineup spans diverse categories including covered call funds, SuperDividend income products, digital assets, commodities, and sector-specific investments, alongside traditional bond and risk-managed income options. Notable tickers like DIV, MLPA, and BCCC reflect their specialization in high-yield and alternative income strategies, positioning them as a provider focused on investors seeking yield-oriented and thematically-driven exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QYLD.

Side-by-side snapshot

QQQQYLD
Full nameInvesco QQQ TrustGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
IssuerInvescoGlobal X
Last Close$712.60 as of July 4, 2026$18.09 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield0.45%12.30%
Distribution Safety Score9583
Expense ratio0.18%0.61%
AUM$481B$8.22B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyMonthly
Underlying indexNasdaq-100 IndexNASDAQ 100
ObjectiveTrack the Nasdaq-100 Index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq stocks.Covered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date03/10/199912/11/2013
Beta1.230.49
Last dividend$0.7941$0.1854
Ex-dividend date12/21/202606/22/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

QQQ has outpaced QYLD over the trailing twelve months, posting a 30.76% total return against 20.88%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: QQQ has compounded at 21.60% a year, against 9.76% for QYLD. QYLD has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 13.2% against 20.2% for QQQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince Dec 2013Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
QQQ16.37%30.76%25.08%15.64%21.60%19.44%20.2%0.891.27-22.8%
QYLD7.58%20.88%13.28%8.10%9.76%8.63%13.2%0.610.87-19.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Dec 2013” measures every fund from December 12, 2013 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) and QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

QYLD offers the higher yield at 12.30% vs 0.45% for QQQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

QQQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.18% compared to 0.61%.

They track different benchmarks: QQQ is linked to Nasdaq-100 Index while QYLD tracks NASDAQ 100, which means their performance drivers differ.

QQQ is the larger fund by assets ($481B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, QQQ would generate roughly $3.75/month, while QYLD would produce $102.50/month, at current distribution rates.

QQQ yield0.45%
QYLD yield12.30%
Monthly diff on $10K$98.75

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, QQQ would cost approximately $180 in fees vs $610 for QYLD (simplified, not compounded). The $430.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

QQQ ER0.18%
QYLD ER0.61%

Strategy & risk

QQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach, while QYLD tracks NASDAQ 100 with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.23 for QQQ and 0.49 for QYLD, indicating QYLD is less volatile relative to the market.

QQQ beta1.23
QYLD beta0.49

Fund details

QQQ is managed by Invesco (launched 03/10/1999) with $481B in assets. QYLD is managed by Global X (launched 12/11/2013) with $8.22B in assets.

QQQ AUM$481B
QYLD AUM$8.22B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is QQQ or QYLD better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. QYLD currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between QQQ and QYLD?

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach, while QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) tracks NASDAQ 100 with a covered call approach. They are issued by Invesco and Global X respectively.

Can I hold both QQQ and QYLD?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, QQQ or QYLD?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while QYLD charges 0.61%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in QQQ vs QYLD generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in QQQ would generate roughly $3.75 per month ($45.00 annually). The same in QYLD would produce about $102.50 per month ($1,230.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, QQQ or QYLD?

QQQ has outpaced QYLD over the trailing twelve months, posting a 30.76% total return against 20.88%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: QQQ has compounded at 21.60% a year, against 9.76% for QYLD. QYLD has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 13.2% against 20.2% for QQQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

QQQ vs QYLD — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

QQQ is a straightforward index fund that tracks the Nasdaq-100, holding the 100 largest non-financial stocks on the Nasdaq exchange with minimal overhead. QYLD holds the same underlying stocks but overlays a covered-call options strategy, selling call options against the portfolio monthly to generate income. The result: QQQ is a growth vehicle with a 0.44% yield; QYLD is an income vehicle with a 12.35% distribution rate, but caps upside in exchange for that premium.

How they differ

The fundamental difference is strategy: QQQ is a buy-and-hold index fund capturing Nasdaq-100 price appreciation plus reinvested dividends, while QYLD systematically sells call options on those same stocks to generate monthly distributions. This shows up immediately in yield (0.44% vs. 12.35%) and in beta (1.23 vs. 0.49), reflecting QYLD's reduced equity-market sensitivity and its capped upside during rallies. The second difference is cost: QYLD's expense ratio of 0.61% is more than three times QQQ's 0.18%, partly because managing the options overlay requires active management. Third, QYLD is substantially smaller ($8.22B vs. $481B in AUM), which can mean tighter trading spreads but also less liquidity depth in large block trades.

Who each is best for

QQQ: Fits investors seeking long-term exposure to Nasdaq-100 growth with minimal friction—those comfortable with market volatility in exchange for full upside participation and lower fees, typically holding for years or decades.

QYLD: Fits investors who prioritize current monthly income from tech and growth stocks over capital appreciation—those with high income needs now, shorter time horizons, or who view the capped upside as a reasonable trade for 12%+ annual distributions.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion on high-yield distributions. QYLD's 12.35% yield is substantially higher than the underlying Nasdaq-100 dividend yield; distributions likely include significant return of capital or premium capture, which can erode NAV over time if the covered-call strategy underperforms its cost.
  • Capped upside during Nasdaq rallies. QYLD's calls are sold monthly to generate income, so when Nasdaq-100 stocks surge, QYLD holders miss most of the gains above the call strike—a material drag in a strong bull market. QQQ holders capture the full move.
  • Concentration in mega-cap tech. Both funds are heavily weighted toward large technology companies (Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, Tesla, etc.). A sector downturn or regulatory headwind in big tech hits both portfolios hard, though QYLD's lower beta (0.49) provides some dampening.
  • Call-strike risk in QYLD. If markets gap up sharply, calls can be deep in the money, forcing assignment and locking in losses or foregone gains. Conversely, if markets drop hard, call premiums fall, reducing the next month's income generation.
  • QQQ beta leverage. At 1.23 beta, QQQ amplifies Nasdaq-100 moves in both directions—a 10% market drop could produce a 12%+ decline in QQQ, concentrating drawdown risk for shorter-term holders.

Bottom line

QQQ works as a core Nasdaq exposure with minimal costs and full upside capture; QYLD trades that upside for meaningful monthly income. If you value growth potential and long-term compounding, QQQ's low fees and unlimited appreciation fit that profile. If you need steady current distributions and can accept capped gains, QYLD's 12.35% yield addresses that need—but monitor that the income doesn't erode your capital over time. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.