DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

QQQ vs VGT: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Invesco QQQ Trust and Vanguard Information Technology ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

ETFs255
Total AUM$971B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major player in the ETF space known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of 71 funds spanning multiple investment themes and strategies. Their portfolio spans income-focused funds, factor-based equity strategies, commodity exposure, digital assets, ESG investing, and the popular Invesco QQQ family tracking the Nasdaq-100, serving both income-seeking and growth-oriented investors. The issuer is particularly recognized for specialized offerings like BulletShares (laddered bond funds), sector rotation strategies, and thematic investing options, making it a comprehensive choice for investors seeking varied exposures beyond traditional index funds.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQ.

ETFs115
Total AUM$4484B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is known for offering low-cost, passively managed ETFs that emphasize broad market exposure and long-term investing. The company operates 175 ETFs across diverse fund families including Index, Bond, Equity, Dividend, Income, International, Factor, and ESG strategies, serving investors with various goals from core portfolio building to specialized income generation. Notable for its scale and popular tickers like VB (total U.S. small-cap), BND (total bond market), and VBIAX (international bonds), Vanguard focuses on providing comprehensive, index-based investment solutions with an emphasis on cost efficiency and accessibility.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VGT.

Side-by-side snapshot

QQQVGT
Full nameInvesco QQQ TrustVanguard Information Technology ETF
IssuerInvescoVanguard
Last Close$712.60 as of July 4, 2026$114.64 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield0.45%0.48%
Distribution Safety Score9589
Expense ratio0.18%0.10%
AUM$481B$143B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Underlying indexNasdaq-100 IndexBasket (Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings)
ObjectiveTrack the Nasdaq-100 Index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq stocks.Seeks to track the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Index/Information Technology 25/50, an index made up of stocks of large, mid-size, and small U.S. companies within the information technology sector, including technology software and services, hardware and equipment, and semiconductor manufacturers.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date03/10/199901/26/2004
Beta1.231.42
Last dividend$0.7941$0.1384
Ex-dividend date12/21/202606/24/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

QQQ has lagged VGT over the trailing twelve months, posting a 30.76% total return against 40.16%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: VGT has compounded at 25.04% a year, against 21.60% for QQQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince Jan 2004Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
QQQ16.37%30.76%25.08%15.64%21.60%14.95%20.2%0.891.27-22.8%
VGT21.44%40.16%28.30%18.86%25.04%14.92%24.2%0.851.20-27.2%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jan 2004” measures every fund from January 30, 2004 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

VGT offers the higher yield at 0.48% vs 0.45% for QQQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

VGT is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.10% compared to 0.18%.

They track different benchmarks: QQQ is linked to Nasdaq-100 Index while VGT tracks Basket (Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings), which means their performance drivers differ.

QQQ is the larger fund by assets ($481B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, QQQ would generate roughly $3.75/month, while VGT would produce $4.00/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

QQQ yield0.45%
VGT yield0.48%
Monthly diff on $10K$0.25

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, QQQ would cost approximately $180 in fees vs $100 for VGT (simplified, not compounded). The $80.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

QQQ ER0.18%
VGT ER0.10%

Strategy & risk

QQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach, while VGT tracks Basket (Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings) with a basket approach. Beta is 1.23 for QQQ and 1.42 for VGT, indicating QQQ is less volatile relative to the market.

QQQ beta1.23
VGT beta1.42

Fund details

QQQ is managed by Invesco (launched 03/10/1999) with $481B in assets. VGT is managed by Vanguard (launched 01/26/2004) with $143B in assets.

QQQ AUM$481B
VGT AUM$143B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is QQQ or VGT better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. VGT currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between QQQ and VGT?

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) tracks Basket (Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings) with a basket approach. They are issued by Invesco and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both QQQ and VGT?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, QQQ or VGT?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VGT charges 0.10%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in QQQ vs VGT generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in QQQ would generate roughly $3.75 per month ($45.00 annually). The same in VGT would produce about $4.00 per month ($48.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, QQQ or VGT?

QQQ has lagged VGT over the trailing twelve months, posting a 30.76% total return against 40.16%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: VGT has compounded at 25.04% a year, against 21.60% for QQQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

QQQ vs VGT — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

QQQ and VGT are both large technology-heavy equity ETFs, but they capture different market segments. QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index, holding 100 of the largest non-financial stocks traded on the Nasdaq—a mix dominated by mega-cap tech but also including healthcare, consumer discretionary, and other sectors. VGT tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology index, giving you pure-play tech sector exposure across large, mid, and small-cap companies. The key distinction: QQQ is a broad Nasdaq tracker with tech dominance, while VGT is sector-pure technology exposure.

How they differ

QQQ's biggest structural difference is its Nasdaq-100 composition, which concentrates on 100 mega-cap names rather than the full universe of tech stocks. VGT, meanwhile, runs deeper into the tech sector across market capitalizations. On yield, they're nearly identical—QQQ distributes 0.44% and VGT 0.48%—but VGT edges ahead slightly while also charging a lower expense ratio of 0.10% versus QQQ's 0.18%. The volatility profiles differ meaningfully: VGT's beta of 1.42 is notably higher than QQQ's 1.23, reflecting its concentrated tech exposure and smaller-cap holdings. VGT also carries $143B in AUM compared to QQQ's $481B, meaning QQQ offers tighter spreads and deeper liquidity.

Who each is best for

QQQ: Fits investors seeking Nasdaq's mega-cap growth exposure with reduced sector concentration risk. The breadth of 100 names and lower beta appeal to those who want technology leadership without pure-sector intensity.

VGT: Designed for investors who want concentrated technology sector exposure across the full market-cap spectrum and don't mind higher volatility in exchange for tighter alignment with tech industry dynamics.

Key risks to know

  • Beta and volatility disparity. VGT's 1.42 beta versus QQQ's 1.23 means VGT amplifies market swings more aggressively, particularly during tech sector downturns.
  • Sector concentration. VGT's pure-tech mandate leaves it vulnerable to broad information technology headwinds—regulatory pressure on large platforms, semiconductor supply constraints, or software spending pullbacks will hit harder than in QQQ's diversified Nasdaq mix.
  • Liquidity and spread risk. QQQ's $481B AUM dwarfs VGT's $143B, making QQQ significantly cheaper to trade in and out of, especially for large positions.
  • Valuation sensitivity. Both funds are growth-heavy and rate-sensitive, but VGT's smaller-cap tech holdings may experience sharper valuation compression if the rate environment shifts unfavorably.

Bottom line

QQQ offers broad Nasdaq exposure with lower volatility and vastly superior liquidity; VGT delivers pure technology sector exposure with higher beta and modestly better yield. If you want tech-tilted growth with some breathing room for non-tech holdings, QQQ's liquidity and structure stand out; if you're committed to sector-pure tech and accept higher swings, VGT's 0.10% expense ratio and deeper sector alignment make the case. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.