DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

QQQM vs QYLD: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

ETFs255
Total AUM$971B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major player in the ETF space known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of 71 funds spanning multiple investment themes and strategies. Their portfolio spans income-focused funds, factor-based equity strategies, commodity exposure, digital assets, ESG investing, and the popular Invesco QQQ family tracking the Nasdaq-100, serving both income-seeking and growth-oriented investors. The issuer is particularly recognized for specialized offerings like BulletShares (laddered bond funds), sector rotation strategies, and thematic investing options, making it a comprehensive choice for investors seeking varied exposures beyond traditional index funds.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQM.

ETFs123
Total AUM$98.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Global X is known for developing thematic and alternative investment ETFs with a strong emphasis on income-generating strategies. Their 37-fund lineup spans diverse categories including covered call funds, SuperDividend income products, digital assets, commodities, and sector-specific investments, alongside traditional bond and risk-managed income options. Notable tickers like DIV, MLPA, and BCCC reflect their specialization in high-yield and alternative income strategies, positioning them as a provider focused on investors seeking yield-oriented and thematically-driven exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QYLD.

Side-by-side snapshot

QQQMQYLD
Full nameInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETFGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
IssuerInvescoGlobal X
Last Close$293.42 as of July 4, 2026$18.09 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield0.48%12.30%
Distribution Safety Score9683
Expense ratio0.15%0.61%
AUM$96.8B$8.22B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyMonthly
Underlying indexNASDAQ-100 IndexNASDAQ 100
ObjectiveTrack the NASDAQ-100 Index with a lower expense ratio alternative to QQQ.Covered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/13/202012/11/2013
Beta1.180.49
Last dividend$0.3520$0.1854
Ex-dividend date06/22/202606/22/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

QQQM has outpaced QYLD over the trailing twelve months, posting a 30.85% total return against 20.88%. The lead holds up over 5 years too: QQQM has compounded at 15.72% a year, against 8.10% for QYLD. QYLD has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 13.2% against 20.0% for QQQM. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1Y3Y5YSince Oct 2020Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
QQQM16.39%30.85%25.16%15.72%17.46%20.0%0.901.29-22.7%
QYLD7.58%20.88%13.28%8.10%9.27%13.2%0.610.87-19.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Oct 2020” measures every fund from October 13, 2020 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

QYLD offers the higher yield at 12.30% vs 0.48% for QQQM. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

QQQM is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.15% compared to 0.61%.

They track different benchmarks: QQQM is linked to NASDAQ-100 Index while QYLD tracks NASDAQ 100, which means their performance drivers differ.

QQQM is the larger fund by assets ($96.8B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, QQQM would generate roughly $4.00/month, while QYLD would produce $102.50/month, at current distribution rates.

QQQM yield0.48%
QYLD yield12.30%
Monthly diff on $10K$98.50

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, QQQM would cost approximately $150 in fees vs $610 for QYLD (simplified, not compounded). The $460.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

QQQM ER0.15%
QYLD ER0.61%

Strategy & risk

QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index with a growth approach, while QYLD tracks NASDAQ 100 with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.18 for QQQM and 0.49 for QYLD, indicating QYLD is less volatile relative to the market.

QQQM beta1.18
QYLD beta0.49

Fund details

QQQM is managed by Invesco (launched 10/13/2020) with $96.8B in assets. QYLD is managed by Global X (launched 12/11/2013) with $8.22B in assets.

QQQM AUM$96.8B
QYLD AUM$8.22B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is QQQM or QYLD better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. QYLD currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between QQQM and QYLD?

QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) tracks NASDAQ-100 Index with a growth approach, while QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) tracks NASDAQ 100 with a covered call approach. They are issued by Invesco and Global X respectively.

Can I hold both QQQM and QYLD?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, QQQM or QYLD?

QQQM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while QYLD charges 0.61%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in QQQM vs QYLD generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in QQQM would generate roughly $4.00 per month ($48.00 annually). The same in QYLD would produce about $102.50 per month ($1,230.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, QQQM or QYLD?

QQQM has outpaced QYLD over the trailing twelve months, posting a 30.85% total return against 20.88%. The lead holds up over 5 years too: QQQM has compounded at 15.72% a year, against 8.10% for QYLD. QYLD has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 13.2% against 20.0% for QQQM. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

QQQM vs QYLD — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

QQQM is a straightforward index tracker of the NASDAQ-100, designed to capture large-cap growth and technology exposure with minimal friction. QYLD, by contrast, owns the same underlying index but systematically sells covered calls against it, generating income at the cost of capped upside — making it a yield-overlay strategy rather than a buy-and-hold index fund. The two funds track the same 100 stocks but deliver radically different return profiles and income mechanics.

How they differ

The core distinction is strategy: QQQM is a passive index fund with a 0.48% distribution rate, while QYLD actively sells call options on NASDAQ-100 holdings to generate a 12.35% yield. That yield premium comes with a structural cost — QYLD's beta of 0.49 versus QQQM's 1.18 reflects the dampening effect of short calls, meaning QYLD captures less of the upside when the index rallies. QYLD also costs more to own (0.61% expense ratio versus QQQM's 0.15%), and the monthly distributions from covered-call premium are taxed differently than QQQM's quarterly dividends. QYLD's smaller asset base ($8.22B versus QQQM's $96.8B) and younger inception date also mean less trading liquidity and a shorter operational track record for the strategy.

Who each is best for

QQQM: Fits investors seeking long-term growth exposure to large-cap tech and growth stocks with minimal drag. Works well for those who want broad NASDAQ-100 participation without paying for active management or income-generation overhead.

QYLD: Fits income-focused investors who are willing to accept capped upside in exchange for consistent monthly cash flow. Designed for those comfortable with options-based strategies and prepared to see limited capital appreciation in strongly rising markets.

Key risks to know

  • Call cap risk: QYLD's covered calls limit gains when NASDAQ stocks rally sharply. In a strong bull market, this drag becomes material — the lower beta reflects meaningful forgone upside relative to QQQM.
  • NAV erosion at extreme yields: A 12.35% distribution rate on a fund trading near $18 creates renewal pressure. If call-premium collection weakens or volatility drops, maintaining that payout level may require return-of-capital treatment, which erodes net asset value over time.
  • Options risk: QYLD's strategy depends on sustained call premiums. A prolonged period of low implied volatility or narrow intra-month trading ranges can reduce option revenue, forcing the fund to choose between cutting distributions or funding them from principal.
  • Technology concentration: Both funds are 100% exposed to NASDAQ-100 constituents, which heavily weight mega-cap tech. A sector pullback hits both hard; QYLD offers no diversification buffer, only capped losses.
  • Tracking cost divergence: QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio is among the lowest for index exposure; QYLD's 0.61% ratio, combined with monthly distribution overhead and options-rebalancing friction, compounds annual drag relative to a buy-and-hold index fund.

Bottom line

If you want pure NASDAQ-100 growth exposure with low cost and no yield-driven constraints, QQQM's index design and deep liquidity stand out. If you prioritize monthly income and can accept that your upside will lag during sustained rallies, QYLD's call-based approach delivers that tradeoff — but the 12.35% yield assumes sustained option premiums, which are not guaranteed. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.