Generated August 29, 2026.
Overview
SGOV and SHV are both Treasury ETFs that provide ultra-safe, highly liquid exposure to short-term U.S. government debt. SGOV tracks Treasury bills maturing in three months or less, while SHV tracks Treasury securities with maturities between one and twelve months. The key distinction is maturity range: SGOV's ultra-short duration makes it function almost like a money-market instrument, whereas SHV's longer maturity window—up to a full year—introduces modestly more interest-rate sensitivity and yield.
How they differ
The most significant difference is maturity exposure. SGOV holds only securities maturing within three months, making it the closest Treasury equivalent to cash, while SHV extends to twelve-month maturities, capturing a wider yield curve. This results in SHV carrying a slightly higher distribution rate (3.68% versus 3.67%) and marginally higher expense ratio (0.15% versus 0.09%). SGOV is substantially larger by assets under management ($106B versus $20.8B) and has a newer inception date (May 2020 versus January 2007). The price difference ($100.43 versus $110.08) reflects their differing average maturities—SGOV trades closer to par because its holdings are so short-dated.
Who each is best for
- SGOV: Fits investors prioritizing maximum stability and minimal price fluctuation, such as those building a high-certainty emergency reserve or seeking near-cash yields with Treasury backing.
- SHV: Fits investors willing to accept modest additional interest-rate sensitivity in exchange for slightly higher yield, or those who view the fuller one-year maturity ladder as a reasonable middle ground between money-market instruments and longer-term bonds.
Key risks to know
- Interest-rate risk at different maturities. SHV's twelve-month maturity window exposes it to greater price volatility if rates rise or fall sharply; SGOV's three-month focus means its NAV will move far less in response to rate changes. This is a feature for SHV if you want additional yield, but a real constraint if you need predictability.
- Reinvestment-rate pressure for both. With distributions arriving monthly and Treasury yields fluctuating, reinvested distributions may land at lower rates during periods of falling yields, reducing the compounding effect over time.
- Minimal credit risk, but duration mismatch with true cash. Neither fund carries meaningful default risk, but SHV's average holding period is roughly six months versus SGOV's six weeks, which matters if you're treating either as an emergency reserve and need to redeem on short notice during market stress.
Bottom line
If you prioritize maximum price stability and true cash-equivalent behavior, SGOV's tighter three-month ceiling and lower expense ratio stand out. If you're comfortable trading small additional NAV fluctuation for a 4-basis-point higher yield and broader curve exposure, SHV's one-year maturity range may justify its slightly higher cost. Both are backed by U.S. Treasury obligations, and past performance does not predict future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.