DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SGOV vs TFLO: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 13, 2026

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSGOVTFLO
Full nameiShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETFiShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
IssueriSharesiShares
Last Close$100.52 as of August 13, 2026$50.56 as of August 13, 2026
Distribution yield3.66%3.79%
Distribution Safety Score™ 7380
Expense ratio0.07%0.15%
AUM$99.9B$6.69B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index
ObjectiveSeeks to track an index of U.S. Treasury obligations maturing in three months or less, investing at least 90% of assets in U.S. Treasury securities.
Asset classFixed IncomeFixed Income
Inception date05/26/202002/04/2014
Beta-0.0029-0.02
Last dividend$0.3070$0.1598
Ex-dividend date08/03/202608/03/2026

Bottom lineSGOV and TFLO are nearly interchangeable — both offer very similar treasury bills exposure with very similar cost and risk. The clearest tie-breaker is cost: SGOV is cheaper at 0.07% vs 0.15%.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs469
Total AUM$4661B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SGOV and TFLO.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

SGOV has outpaced TFLO over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.85% total return against 3.60%. The picture flips over 5 years, though — TFLO has compounded at 3.72% a year, ahead of SGOV at 3.68%. SGOV has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.2% against 0.4% for TFLO. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5YSince May 2020Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SGOV2.20%3.85%4.62%3.68%2.97%0.2%0.190.30-0.0%
TFLO1.98%3.60%4.53%3.72%2.99%0.4%-0.14-0.18-0.3%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 12, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since May 2020” measures every fund from May 28, 2020 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) and TFLO (iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

TFLO offers the higher yield at 3.79% vs 3.66% for SGOV. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SGOV is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.07% compared to 0.15%.

SGOV is the larger fund by assets ($99.9B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SGOV would generate roughly $30.50/month, while TFLO would produce $31.58/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

SGOV yield3.66%
TFLO yield3.79%
Monthly diff on $10K$1.08

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SGOV would cost approximately $70 in fees vs $150 for TFLO (simplified, not compounded). The $80.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SGOV ER0.07%
TFLO ER0.15%

Strategy & risk

SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index with a bonds approach, while TFLO is an ETF.

SGOV beta-0.0029
TFLO beta-0.02

Fund details

SGOV is managed by iShares (launched 05/26/2020) with $99.9B in assets. TFLO is managed by iShares (launched 02/04/2014) with $6.69B in assets.

SGOV AUM$99.9B
TFLO AUM$6.69B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for SGOV and TFLO?

SGOV currently distributes 3.66% and TFLO 3.79%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is SGOV or TFLO better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. TFLO currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SGOV and TFLO?

SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index with a bonds approach, while TFLO (iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF) is an ETF. They are issued by iShares and iShares respectively.

Can I hold both SGOV and TFLO?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is SGOV or TFLO safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — TFLO scores 80, SGOV scores 73, so TFLO's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, SGOV or TFLO?

SGOV has an expense ratio of 0.07% while TFLO charges 0.15%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SGOV vs TFLO generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SGOV would generate roughly $30.50 per month ($366.00 annually). The same in TFLO would produce about $31.58 per month ($379.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SGOV or TFLO?

SGOV has outpaced TFLO over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.85% total return against 3.60%. The picture flips over 5 years, though — TFLO has compounded at 3.72% a year, ahead of SGOV at 3.68%. SGOV has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.2% against 0.4% for TFLO. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SGOV vs TFLO — at a glance

Generated August 8, 2026.

Overview

SGOV and TFLO are both Treasury-focused fixed-income ETFs that distribute income monthly, but they target different parts of the yield curve and interest-rate environment. SGOV holds Treasury bills maturing in three months or less and tracks a passive index. TFLO holds longer-duration Treasury securities with floating-rate coupons that reset periodically, giving it different sensitivity to rate moves.

How they differ

The biggest difference is duration and rate sensitivity. SGOV invests exclusively in ultra-short bills (0–3 months), which means its price barely moves when rates change; TFLO holds floating-rate Treasuries, which have longer maturities but coupons that adjust with short-term rates, so it carries more duration risk but captures upside if short rates rise. SGOV has a far larger asset base at $99.9B versus TFLO's $6.69B, and SGOV's expense ratio is 0.07% compared to TFLO's 0.15%, a meaningful gap on smaller positions. The yield difference is slim—SGOV at 3.67% and TFLO at 3.79%—but SGOV's lower fee makes its net return more competitive despite the slightly lower stated distribution rate.

Who each is best for

SGOV: Fits investors seeking near-cash stability with minimal rate sensitivity—those building a core short-duration bond sleeve or looking to park reserves while earning current rates without betting on interest-rate direction.

TFLO: Designed for investors who believe short rates will stay flat or rise, and who can tolerate moderate duration exposure in exchange for a higher yield pickup and the ability to benefit if the Fed holds rates steady or tightens further.

Key risks to know

  • Rate-lock risk for SGOV. If short-term rates fall, SGOV's yield and distributions will decline quickly as its holdings mature and roll into lower-yielding bills; there is no price appreciation buffer because bills trade at or near par.
  • Duration and market risk for TFLO. Floating-rate Treasuries still carry duration—if rates fall unexpectedly, TFLO's net asset value could decline noticeably before coupons reset upward, and the fund's longer maturity profile means larger day-to-day price swings than SGOV.
  • Floating-rate coupon reset timing. TFLO's coupons reset on a schedule tied to short-term benchmarks; if the Fed cuts rates between reset dates, TFLO's cash flow will lag actual market rates, creating a timing drag during sharp downward rate moves.
  • Reinvestment assumptions baked into yields. Both funds' stated distribution rates assume rates remain stable; if the rate environment shifts materially, actual total returns may diverge significantly from past distributions.

Bottom line

SGOV offers stability and simplicity—essentially cash-equivalent returns—at a rock-bottom fee; TFLO trades some of that stability for a modest yield lift and duration exposure in a floating-rate structure. If you want to avoid interest-rate bets and maintain principal stability, SGOV's massive liquidity and minimal fee stand out; if you're comfortable with modest price fluctuation and want to capture upside from stable or rising rates, TFLO's extra yield may justify the higher expense ratio. Past performance doesn't predict future results, and both funds' distributions will track changes in short-term Treasury rates.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.