DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

WEEK vs SGOV: Same T-Bills, Different Payout Cadence

A head-to-head of Roundhill's weekly Treasury ETF and the iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF covering payout schedule, cost, size, and cash role.

Updated October 2, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • SGOVInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.
  • WEEKInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

SGOV has outpaced WEEK over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.79% total return against 3.64%. Measured from Mar 2025 — the start of shared available history — SGOV has compounded at 3.97% a year versus 3.82% for WEEK. SGOV has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.2% against 0.4% for WEEK. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Mar 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SGOV2.73%3.79%3.97%0.2%-4.39-5.44-0.0%
WEEK2.64%3.64%3.82%0.4%-2.13-2.70-0.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Mar 2025” measures every fund from March 6, 2025 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Short T-bill ETFs, from our catalog

SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index and pays monthly at a forward distribution rate of 3.60% with an expense ratio of 0.09%.

BIL, another short Treasury ETF in this catalog, tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index at a forward distribution rate of 3.45% (Monthly) with an expense ratio of 0.1353%.

These are interest-like cash rates, not equity dividends. A covered-call or dividend ETF can pay more, and it can also lose principal.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSGOVWEEK
Full nameiShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETFRoundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF
IssueriSharesRoundhill Investments
Underlying indexICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities IndexU.S. Treasury bills (0–3 months)
Last Close$100.44 as of October 2, 2026$100.04 as of October 2, 2026
Distribution rate3.60%3.59%
Trailing 12-month yield3.65%3.54%
Distribution Safety Score™ 7993
Safety-Adjusted Yield 2.84%3.34%
Expense ratio0.09%0.19%
AUM$112B$185M
Distribution frequencyMonthlyWeekly
ObjectiveSeeks to track an index of U.S. Treasury obligations maturing in three months or less, investing at least 90% of assets in U.S. Treasury securities.Seeks to provide investors with exposure to U.S. Treasury bills with a weekly distribution strategy, offering a cash management solution with regular income from short-term government securities.
Asset classFixed IncomeEquity
Inception date05/26/202003/06/2025
Beta-0.0029-0.0025
Last dividend$0.301 declared, pays 10/06/2026$0.068996
Ex-dividend date10/01/202609/29/2026

Bottom lineSGOV and WEEK are both for investors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Cost is: SGOV charges 0.09% against 0.19% for WEEK, and between two funds this similar that gap comes straight out of your return every year you hold.

WEEK vs SGOV: same bills, different paycheck

Both park cash in 0-3 month US Treasury bills. WEEK pays weekly; SGOV pays monthly. Cost and fund size are the other real gaps — the yield gap is usually just those two plus the payout calendar.

SGOVWEEK
What it holdsICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities IndexU.S. Treasury bills (0–3 months)
Payout scheduleMonthlyWeekly
Expense ratio0.09%0.19%
Distribution rate3.60%3.59%
Fund size$112B$185M
Better fit forLowest-cost T-bill cash at scaleWeekly cash flow from the same bill stack

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs466
Total AUM$4683B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SGOV.

ETFs56
Total AUM$39.7B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering innovative, specialized ETFs that often feature weekly dividend distributions and exposure to trending themes and individual mega-cap stocks. Their lineup spans income-focused strategies, leveraged products, thematic investments in areas like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, and weekly-pay funds that appeal to investors seeking frequent distributions. The issuer has built a distinctive niche with products targeting both traditional income seekers and those interested in emerging sectors, offering a diverse range of tickers that go well beyond conventional dividend vehicles.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on WEEK.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) and WEEK (Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SGOV offers the higher yield at 3.60% vs 3.59% for WEEK. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SGOV is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.09% compared to 0.19%.

They have different reference exposures: SGOV is linked to ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index while WEEK is linked to U.S. Treasury bills (0–3 months), which means their performance drivers differ.

SGOV is the larger fund by assets ($112B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SGOV would generate roughly $30.00 cash per distribution, while WEEK would produce $6.90 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

SGOV yield3.60%
WEEK yield3.59%
Cash diff on $10K$23.10

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SGOV would cost approximately $90 in fees vs $190 for WEEK (simplified, not compounded). The $100.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SGOV ER0.09%
WEEK ER0.19%

Strategy & risk

SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index with a bonds approach, while WEEK tracks U.S. Treasury bills (0–3 months) with a cash approach.

SGOV beta-0.0029
WEEK beta-0.0025

Fund details

SGOV is managed by iShares (launched 05/26/2020) with $112B in assets. WEEK is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 03/06/2025) with $185M in assets.

SGOV AUM$112B
WEEK AUM$185M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the 30-day SEC yield for SGOV and WEEK?

SGOV and WEEK have not published a 30-day SEC yield in our data, so we do not quote one — the issuer's own fund page and fact sheet carry the official figure. What we track for every fund is the trailing distribution yield: SGOV at 3.60% and WEEK at 3.59%, based on fund data updated October 2026. The two measures answer different questions. The SEC yield is a standardized 30-day estimate of net investment income after expenses; the distribution yield annualizes what was actually paid out. For short-dated Treasury funds the two usually track each other closely, because nearly all of the return is bill interest paid out as it is earned rather than price movement.

What is the current distribution rate for SGOV and WEEK?

SGOV currently distributes 3.60% and WEEK 3.59%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is SGOV or WEEK better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SGOV currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both SGOV and WEEK?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is SGOV or WEEK safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — WEEK scores 93, SGOV scores 79, so WEEK's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, SGOV or WEEK?

SGOV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while WEEK charges 0.19%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SGOV vs WEEK generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SGOV would generate roughly $30.00 cash per distribution ($360.00 annually). The same in WEEK would produce about $6.90 cash per distribution ($359.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SGOV or WEEK?

SGOV has outpaced WEEK over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.79% total return against 3.64%. Measured from Mar 2025 — the start of shared available history — SGOV has compounded at 3.97% a year versus 3.82% for WEEK. SGOV has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.2% against 0.4% for WEEK. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SGOV vs WEEK — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Overview

SGOV and WEEK are both Treasury bill ETFs that invest in U.S. government securities maturing within three months, but they differ fundamentally in distribution cadence and fund maturity. Both offer near-identical yields around 3.6%, but they serve different cash-management preferences. This matters for investors who reinvest distributions or want more frequent income — weekly payouts create more frequent rebalancing opportunities and cash-flow decision points. Third, SGOV has a 0.09% expense ratio versus 0.19% for WEEK, a 0.1% difference; SGOV's lower cost reflects its older, larger scale with $112B, while WEEK's newer 1 year launch date and $185M asset base carry higher per-unit overhead.

Who each is best for

SGOV: Fits investors who prioritize cost efficiency and index transparency in a Treasury bill allocation, and who are comfortable with monthly income frequency as part of a broader cash-management or fixed-income ladder.

WEEK: Designed for investors who value weekly liquidity events and regular income distribution timing — useful for those who reinvest distributions methodically or who treat the fund as a high-frequency cash vehicle rather than a set-and-forget holding.

Key risks to know

  • Interest rate reset risk: Both funds hold ultra-short Treasury bills, so near-term rates are baked in. If the Federal Reserve cuts rates substantially over the coming months, reinvestment of distributions will occur at lower yields, eroding the effective income stream relative to current expectations.
  • NAV stability at low duration: Treasury bills maturing in three months or less have virtually no price volatility, so both funds' NAVs should remain very close to $100.
  • Benchmark divergence for WEEK: WEEK does not disclose a published index, making it harder to audit whether its bill selection and fee structure genuinely match stated objectives. SGOV's indexed approach offers objective verification of holdings and performance relative to the ICE benchmark.
  • Fee erosion at scale: WEEK's 0.19% expense ratio, while seemingly modest, compounds over time. At a 3.59% distribution rate, the fee represents 0.19% of gross yield — a meaningful drag on a fund designed for cash management, where basis points matter more than in higher-yielding instruments.

Bottom line

If you want the largest, lowest-cost Treasury bill vehicle with a published index and established track record, SGOV's scale and 0.09% expense ratio stand out. If you prioritize weekly payout frequency for cash-management workflows or reinvestment discipline, WEEK's structure may fit your preferences — but verify that its bill-selection process and fee structure justify the 0.1% cost premium before committing. Past performance does not predict future yields, and both funds' income will follow short-term Treasury rate movements.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.