Generated August 15, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
Overview
VT and VTI are both Vanguard equity index ETFs designed to capture broad market returns at minimal cost, but they cover fundamentally different universes. VT tracks global stocks—developed and emerging markets combined—while VTI focuses exclusively on U.S. equities. For a U.S. investor, the choice between them hinges on whether you want domestic-only or worldwide exposure.
How they differ
The biggest difference is geography. VT holds developed and emerging-market stocks alongside U.S. holdings via the FTSE Global All Cap Index; VTI holds only U.S.-listed stocks via the CRSP US Total Market Index. This means VTI's returns track U.S. market performance, while VT's returns reflect a global mix weighted by market capitalization.
VTI is far larger, with $696B in AUM compared to VT's $80.9B, and carries a lower expense ratio of 0.03% versus VT's 0.07%—a meaningful gap for long-term holders. VTI also has a slightly higher beta of 1.0379 versus VT's 0.98, reflecting U.S. equity volatility versus a diversified global portfolio.
Distribution yields are modest and similar: VTI yields 1.09% and VT yields 1.39%, both paid quarterly. The yield difference partly reflects VT's inclusion of higher-yielding international equities, though both are income-light by design.
Who each is best for
VT: Fits investors seeking worldwide equity exposure in a single holding—those who want developed and emerging-market participation and believe global diversification reduces home-country concentration risk.
VTI: Fits investors who want the broadest possible U.S. equity exposure at the lowest cost and believe a domestic focus aligns with their liabilities and spending needs.
Key risks to know
- Geographic concentration. VT's inclusion of emerging markets introduces currency risk and political/regulatory uncertainty absent from VTI's purely domestic holdings. Conversely, VTI concentrates entirely on U.S. performance, which may underperform in periods of dollar weakness or global outperformance of non-U.S. markets.
- Currency exposure. VT's non-U.S. holdings fluctuate with exchange rates; a strong dollar can drag on VT's return even if underlying stocks perform well. VTI has no currency drag from foreign holdings.
- Index methodology differences. FTSE Global All Cap and CRSP US Total Market employ different weighting and inclusion rules, so the funds' sector and style tilts will diverge. Holdings overlap may be substantial but is not complete.
- Market-cap-weighted structure. Both funds are market-cap weighted, meaning they're heavily tilted toward the largest companies; this is a feature, not a flaw, but it means concentration in mega-cap stocks in both cases.
Bottom line
If you want a truly global portfolio in one low-cost vehicle, VT provides that breadth; if you're building a U.S.-focused portfolio and want the widest domestic coverage at the lowest expense ratio, VTI stands out. The choice isn't about which fund is "better"—it's about whether your investment plan calls for global or domestic equity exposure. Past performance of either fund does not predict future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.