DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

WARP vs XSPC: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of VanEck Space ETF and VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 31, 2026

ETFs84
Total AUM$156B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VanEck is known for offering specialized and thematic ETFs across diverse asset classes, including commodities, digital assets, and sector-specific investments. The firm's 22-fund lineup spans income-generating options, covered call strategies, and growth-focused equity funds, with popular tickers including GDX (gold miners), SMH (semiconductors), MOAT (competitive advantage stocks), and HODL (bitcoin). VanEck distinguishes itself through niche exposure areas such as digital assets, commodities, and thematic investing strategies, complemented by traditional bond and municipal bond offerings.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on WARP.

ETFs3
Total AUM$24.7M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VegaShares operates a focused suite of two income-focused ETFs designed to generate regular distributions through options strategies and dividend investing. The firm's lineup includes ODTE and VAIE, both emphasizing yield generation for investors seeking regular cash flow. With a specialized niche in options-based and dividend income strategies, VegaShares targets investors prioritizing distributions over capital appreciation.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XSPC.

Side-by-side snapshot

WARPXSPC
Full nameVanEck Space ETFVegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF
IssuerVanEckVegaShares
Last Close$18.72 as of July 31, 2026$18.62 as of July 31, 2026
Distribution yield
Distribution Safety Score™
Expense ratio0.50%0.75%
AUM$34.0M$1.85M
Distribution frequencyNoneNone
Underlying index
ObjectiveInvests in companies generating significant revenue from space-related activities, including satellite communications, launch services, aerospace technology, and Earth observation.Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date05/06/202606/15/2026

— Distribution yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because WARP launched May 2026 and XSPC launched June 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineWARP and XSPC are nearly interchangeable — both offer very similar exposure with very similar cost and risk. The clearest tie-breaker is cost: WARP is cheaper at 0.50% vs 0.75%.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

WARP has outpaced XSPC over the year to date, posting a -25.95% total return against -26.01%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTDSince Jun 2026
WARP-25.95%-27.94%
XSPC-26.01%-26.01%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 31, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2026” measures every fund from June 16, 2026 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window.

Quick verdict

WARP (VanEck Space ETF) and XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

WARP is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.50% compared to 0.75%.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, WARP has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while XSPC has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

WARP yield
XSPC yield

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, WARP would cost approximately $500 in fees vs $750 for XSPC (simplified, not compounded). The $250.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

WARP ER0.50%
XSPC ER0.75%

Strategy & risk

WARP is an ETF, while XSPC is an ETF.

Fund details

WARP is managed by VanEck (launched 05/06/2026) with $34.0M in assets. XSPC is managed by VegaShares (launched 06/15/2026) with $1.85M in assets.

WARP AUM$34.0M
XSPC AUM$1.85M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of WARP or XSPC pays more dividend income?

XSPC currently reports a distribution yield, while WARP has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between WARP and XSPC?

WARP (VanEck Space ETF) is an ETF, while XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) is an ETF. They are issued by VanEck and VegaShares respectively.

Can I hold both WARP and XSPC?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, WARP or XSPC?

WARP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while XSPC charges 0.75%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in WARP vs XSPC generate?

At current rates, WARP has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. XSPC has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, WARP or XSPC?

WARP has outpaced XSPC over the year to date, posting a -25.95% total return against -26.01%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.