DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

AMZY vs NVDY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 2, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • AMZYInvestors who are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.
  • NVDYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 35.42%, generated by selling options premium.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

AMZY has lagged NVDY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 9.75% total return against 25.47%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: NVDY has compounded at 54.17% a year, against 21.99% for AMZY. AMZY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 25.4% against 38.1% for NVDY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualizedSince Jul 2023Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
AMZY7.51%9.75%21.99%21.65%25.4%0.610.88-23.7%
NVDY21.85%25.47%54.17%52.25%38.1%1.021.42-34.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jul 2023” measures every fund from July 25, 2023 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Distribution rate, SEC yield and return of capital

MetricAMZYNVDY
Forward distribution rate24.92%35.42%
Trailing 12-month yield49.91%54.96%
30-day SEC yield3.12%2.53%
Return of capital0.00%93.24%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Total return against the stated underlying is on AMZY vs AMZN, NVDY vs NVDA.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricAMZYNVDY
Full nameYieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETFYieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Underlying indexAmazon (AMZN)NVIDIA (NVDA)
Last Close$10.31 as of October 2, 2026$12.83 as of October 2, 2026
Distribution rate24.92%35.42%
Trailing 12-month yield49.91%54.96%
30-day SEC yield3.12%2.53%
Distribution Safety Score™ 5656
Safety-Adjusted Yield 13.96%19.84%
Expense ratio1.09%1.09%
AUM$211M$1.40B
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
ObjectiveYieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF seeks current income while providing indirect exposure to the share price returns of Amazon.com, Inc. common stock, subject to a limit on potential investment gains. The fund does not invest directly in Amazon.com, Inc.; it uses a synthetic covered call strategy built from standardized exchange-traded options.YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF seeks current income while providing indirect exposure to the share price returns of NVIDIA Corporation common stock, subject to a limit on potential investment gains. The fund does not invest directly in NVIDIA Corporation; it uses a synthetic covered call strategy built from standardized exchange-traded options.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date07/24/202305/09/2023
Beta1.161.43
Last dividend$0.0494 payable today$0.0874 payable today
Ex-dividend date10/01/202610/01/2026

Bottom lineChoose AMZY if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout. Choose NVDY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 35.42%, generated by selling options premium. AMZY and NVDY both use option or derivative overlays. Their tradeoff is the underlying exposure, how each option strategy is implemented, and the yield each targets; either overlay can limit upside participation, so neither offers uncapped price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. AMZY and NVDY generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs62
Total AUM$10.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AMZY and NVDY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF) and NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

NVDY offers the higher yield at 35.42% vs 24.92% for AMZY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

They have different reference exposures: AMZY is linked to Amazon (AMZN) while NVDY is linked to NVIDIA (NVDA), which means their performance drivers differ.

NVDY is the larger fund by assets ($1.40B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose AMZY

YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF

  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 1.2 vs 1.4 for NVDY.

Choose NVDY

YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — NVDY distributes roughly 35.42% from selling options premium, vs 24.92% for AMZY.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, AMZY would generate roughly $47.92 cash per distribution, while NVDY would produce $68.12 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

AMZY yield24.92%
NVDY yield35.42%
Cash diff on $10K$20.19

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, AMZY would cost approximately $1,090 in fees vs $1,090 for NVDY (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.

AMZY ER1.09%
NVDY ER1.09%

Strategy & risk

AMZY tracks Amazon (AMZN) with a covered call approach, while NVDY tracks NVIDIA (NVDA) with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.16 for AMZY and 1.43 for NVDY, making AMZY the less volatile of the two by this measure.

AMZY beta1.16
NVDY beta1.43

Fund details

AMZY is managed by YieldMax (launched 07/24/2023) with $211M in assets. NVDY is managed by YieldMax (launched 05/09/2023) with $1.40B in assets.

AMZY AUM$211M
NVDY AUM$1.40B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for AMZY and NVDY?

AMZY currently distributes 24.92% and NVDY 35.42%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is AMZY or NVDY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. NVDY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between AMZY and NVDY?

AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Amazon (AMZN) with a covered call approach, while NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks NVIDIA (NVDA) with a covered call approach. They are issued by YieldMax and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both AMZY and NVDY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is AMZY or NVDY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: AMZY scores 56, NVDY scores 56. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. AMZY has also shown lower price volatility (beta 1.16 vs 1.43 for NVDY). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, AMZY or NVDY?

AMZY and NVDY both charge the same expense ratio of 1.09%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.

How much income does $10,000 in AMZY vs NVDY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in AMZY would generate roughly $47.92 cash per distribution ($2,492.00 annually). The same in NVDY would produce about $68.12 cash per distribution ($3,542.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, AMZY or NVDY?

AMZY has lagged NVDY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 9.75% total return against 25.47%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: NVDY has compounded at 54.17% a year, against 21.99% for AMZY. AMZY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 25.4% against 38.1% for NVDY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

AMZY vs NVDY — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Overview

AMZY and NVDY are both options-based income ETFs that use synthetic covered call strategies to generate weekly distributions from single underlying stocks—Amazon and NVIDIA, respectively. Neither fund owns the underlying shares directly; instead, they replicate covered call exposure through standardized exchange-traded options. The key difference is their underlying asset: AMZY targets a more mature, lower-volatility tech giant, while NVDY targets a higher-beta semiconductor leader, which drives a significant yield gap between them.

How they differ

The most striking difference is distribution rate: NVDY yields 35.42% while AMZY yields 24.92%, a 10.5% percentage-point spread. This gap reflects the underlying stocks' volatility and implied option premiums—NVDA's higher beta (1.43 vs. 1.16) and rapid share-price appreciation create richer call premiums that the fund captures. Both charge 1.09% in fees and distribute weekly, so the structural mechanics are identical; the yield and size differences are purely a function of their different underlying stocks and market conditions at their respective 07/24/2023 and 05/09/2023 launch dates.

Who each is best for

* AMZY: Fits investors seeking high current income from a mature tech holding who are comfortable capping upside in exchange for regular weekly cash flow and can tolerate a covered-call structure.

* NVDY: Fits investors drawn to high-yield equity derivatives who can accept the elevated distribution rate as a signal of potential faster NAV erosion and who prioritize maximum current income over capital appreciation potential. AMZY, at 24.92%, faces similar but less acute erosion risk.

* Capped upside from covered calls. Both funds' call-selling strategy limits stock-price appreciation. If Amazon or NVIDIA rallies sharply, shareholders forfeit gains above the strike; the synthetic structure locks in opportunity cost in ways a direct stock purchase would not.

* Concentration and single-stock risk. Each fund holds indirect exposure to only one company. There is no diversification within the fund; sector shocks, company-specific risk, or executive/operational changes directly impact returns with no offsetting holdings.

* Options liquidity and roll risk. Weekly distributions require the fund to continually sell and roll new call options. If call liquidity deteriorates or implied volatility collapses, the fund may struggle to maintain its targeted income level, and roll prices could move against it.

* Beta amplification in downturns. NVDY's beta of 1.43 means it will likely decline faster than the broad market in a correction. The covered-call cushion provides only partial downside protection because the calls are sold against a leveraged underlying position (in effect, through the derivative structure).

Bottom line

If you prioritize maximum current income and can accept the likelihood of NAV decline, NVDY's 35.42% yield reflects NVIDIA's volatility premium and has attracted $1.40B in assets. If you want a less aggressive income overlay on a lower-volatility tech name, AMZY's 24.92% yield and smaller size trade some current cash flow for a gentler erosion profile. Both carry meaningful concentration and upside-cap risks inherent to single-stock covered-call ETFs; past performance does not predict future distributions or NAV stability.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.