Generated July 2026 from current fund data.
Overview
AMZY and NVDY are single-stock covered call ETFs that sell weekly call options against concentrated positions in Amazon and NVIDIA, respectively. Both funds use YieldMax's option-writing strategy to generate income that far exceeds typical equity dividends, but they differ materially in underlying volatility, fund size, and distribution yield. These are tactical income vehicles, not core equity holdings, and their high yields come with the tradeoff of capped upside and ongoing NAV risk.
How they differ
The headline difference is yield: NVDY distributes 42.05% annualized versus AMZY's 32.85%, a gap that reflects NVIDIA's significantly higher implied volatility (and beta of 1.3 versus 1.1373 for Amazon). That volatility lift is what lets YieldMax extract more premium from NVIDIA call sales week to week. NVDY has also accumulated substantially more assets—$1.43B versus AMZY's $246M—suggesting stronger investor demand for the higher-yield strategy, though it arrived later (inception May 2023 vs. July 2023). Both charge 1.01% in expenses, and both distribute weekly, so the real operational difference narrows to the single-stock bet and the options premium each underlying generates.
Who each is best for
AMZY: Fits investors who want weekly income from Amazon exposure with slightly lower volatility and a more measured (though still elevated) distribution rate, and who are comfortable with caps on price appreciation in exchange for that income flow.
NVDY: Fits investors seeking maximum current income from a concentrated NVIDIA position and who have a higher tolerance for the volatility that drives the fund's outsized yield, accepting tighter upside limits as the cost of that premium.
Key risks to know
- NAV erosion at yields above 40%. NVDY's 42.05% distribution rate means the fund is likely returning capital in excess of NVIDIA's underlying earnings and option premiums combined. This creates persistent pressure on net asset value over time, particularly if the underlying stock appreciates modestly—shareholders may see their unit value decline even as they collect distributions.
- Call assignment and upside capping. Both funds sell calls weekly, so any meaningful rally in Amazon or NVIDIA can result in early assignment, forcing the fund to sell shares at the strike price and miss further gains. This is structural to covered call strategies and limits total return during bull markets.
- Concentration risk in single volatile equities. AMZY and NVDY each hold only one stock, magnifying the impact of company-specific news, earnings misses, or sector rotation. NVIDIA's 1.3 beta makes it especially sensitive to tech weakness or risk-off reversals, while Amazon's steadier 1.1373 beta offers marginally more stability—but neither offers diversification of any kind.
- Options market dislocation and implied volatility crash. If implied volatility on AMZN or NVDA falls sharply (as can happen during sustained rallies or reduced uncertainty), the premium YieldMax can collect from call sales shrinks significantly, compressing the fund's forward yield and potentially disappointing investors who bought at current distribution rates.
- Weekly rebalancing friction in low-liquidity environments. YieldMax's weekly options cycle and rebalancing could face execution challenges in periods of market stress, potentially widening bid-ask spreads or delaying position adjustments.
Bottom line
If you want high current income from a single mega-cap tech name and can tolerate the NAV erosion and upside caps that come with a 42% yield, NVDY's larger asset base and higher premium extraction may feel more liquid. If you prefer lower distribution pressure with a still-generous (32%) income stream and a slightly less volatile underlying, AMZY offers a marginally more conservative version of the same trade. Neither fund is a long-term wealth builder; both are tactical income strategies that work best for investors comfortable harvesting premium from concentrated bets. Past performance of the underlying stocks does not predict how much income these funds will generate going forward.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.