DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

AMZY vs MSTY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

ETFs60
Total AUM$9.78B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AMZY and MSTY.

Side-by-side snapshot

AMZYMSTY
Full nameYieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETFYieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Last Close$10.67 as of July 4, 2026$13.58 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield32.85%59.35%
Distribution Safety Score6631
Expense ratio1.01%0.99%
AUM$246M$1.01B
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
Underlying indexAmazon (AMZN)Strategy (MSTR)
ObjectiveCovered CallCovered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date07/24/202302/21/2024
Beta1.13732.5604
Last dividend$0.0674$0.1550
Ex-dividend date06/18/202606/18/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

AMZY has outpaced MSTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 1.09% total return against -69.58%. Measured from Feb 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — AMZY has compounded at 11.19% a year versus 6.04% for MSTY. AMZY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.7% against 64.9% for MSTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Feb 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
AMZY-1.04%1.09%11.19%24.7%-0.14-0.18-20.0%
MSTY-35.18%-69.58%6.04%64.9%-1.90-2.46-77.7%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Feb 2024” measures every fund from February 22, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

MSTY offers the higher yield at 59.35% vs 32.85% for AMZY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

MSTY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.99% compared to 1.01%.

They track different benchmarks: AMZY is linked to Amazon (AMZN) while MSTY tracks Strategy (MSTR), which means their performance drivers differ.

MSTY is the larger fund by assets ($1.01B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, AMZY would generate roughly $273.75/month, while MSTY would produce $494.58/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

AMZY yield32.85%
MSTY yield59.35%
Monthly diff on $10K$220.83

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, AMZY would cost approximately $1,010 in fees vs $990 for MSTY (simplified, not compounded). The $20.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

AMZY ER1.01%
MSTY ER0.99%

Strategy & risk

AMZY tracks Amazon (AMZN) with a covered call approach, while MSTY tracks Strategy (MSTR) with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.1373 for AMZY and 2.5604 for MSTY, indicating AMZY is less volatile relative to the market.

AMZY beta1.1373
MSTY beta2.5604

Fund details

AMZY is managed by YieldMax (launched 07/24/2023) with $246M in assets. MSTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 02/21/2024) with $1.01B in assets.

AMZY AUM$246M
MSTY AUM$1.01B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is AMZY or MSTY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. MSTY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between AMZY and MSTY?

AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Amazon (AMZN) with a covered call approach, while MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Strategy (MSTR) with a covered call approach. They are issued by YieldMax and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both AMZY and MSTY?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, AMZY or MSTY?

AMZY has an expense ratio of 1.01% while MSTY charges 0.99%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in AMZY vs MSTY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in AMZY would generate roughly $273.75 per month ($3,285.00 annually). The same in MSTY would produce about $494.58 per month ($5,935.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, AMZY or MSTY?

AMZY has outpaced MSTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 1.09% total return against -69.58%. Measured from Feb 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — AMZY has compounded at 11.19% a year versus 6.04% for MSTY. AMZY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.7% against 64.9% for MSTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

AMZY vs MSTY — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

AMZY and MSTY are single-stock covered-call ETFs from YieldMax that sell weekly call options on Amazon and MicroStrategy respectively, distributing the premium income to shareholders. The defining difference is their underlying assets: AMZY tracks a mega-cap, low-volatility technology company, while MSTY targets a smaller, volatile Bitcoin-proxy play. This choice drives dramatic differences in yield, risk, and portfolio dynamics.

How they differ

MSTY's distribution rate of 84.79% towers over AMZY's 32.36%, but that gap reflects MSTR's much higher implied volatility—not superior performance. MSTY's beta of 2.56 is more than double AMZY's 1.14, meaning MSTR's stock movements are substantially more violent. MSTY has grown to $1.01B in AUM versus AMZY's $246M, suggesting broader adoption of the more aggressive crypto-linked strategy. Both charge similar expense ratios (MSTY at 0.99%, AMZY at 1.01%) and distribute weekly, but the income mechanics diverge sharply: AMZY generates premium from steady, modest volatility; MSTY harvests it from MSTR's dramatic swings. MSTY also has a much shorter track record, having launched in February 2024 versus AMZY's July 2023 inception.

Who each is best for

AMZY: Fits investors seeking a covered-call income supplement on a core technology holding who can tolerate the cap on upside from sold calls but want lower volatility and more predictable weekly cash flow.

MSTY: Designed for investors with high risk tolerance and a thesis on Bitcoin's appreciation who are willing to accept significant NAV swings and potential principal erosion in exchange for aggressive current income from call premiums.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yields. MSTY's 84.79% annualized distribution rate implies distributions will likely exceed underlying capital returns over any multi-year period, pressuring NAV unless MSTR appreciates sharply. AMZY's 32.36% yield is more sustainable but still requires monitoring over long holding periods.
  • Volatility mismatch and call assignment. MSTY's 2.56 beta means sharp rallies in MSTR can trigger assignment of sold calls at strike prices that prove deeply in-the-money, capping gains during bull runs. AMZY faces this risk too, though AMZN's lower volatility makes it less acute.
  • Concentration and single-name risk. Both funds hold only one stock. MSTY concentrates on MSTR, which depends on Bitcoin price movement and carries execution risk as a smaller company. AMZY is single-stock exposure too, though AMZN's scale and diversified business reduce idiosyncratic blow-up risk.
  • Crypto-correlated volatility in MSTY. MicroStrategy's stock is a leveraged bet on Bitcoin. If Bitcoin enters a prolonged bear market, MSTY shareholders may see steep NAV declines alongside diminishing call premium income, creating a compounding loss dynamic.

Bottom line

If you want steady, modest income from a diversified mega-cap technology stake with lower volatility, AMZY's 32% yield and 1.14 beta offer a smoother ride. If you're bullish on Bitcoin and can tolerate 2.5+ beta swings for aggressive current income, MSTY's 84% yield justifies the risk—but only if you're prepared for significant principal volatility and understand that distributions alone don't guarantee positive returns. Past performance, especially over such short track records, doesn't predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.