DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

AMZY vs CONY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 2, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • AMZYInvestors who are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.
  • CONYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 68.65%, generated by selling options premium.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

AMZY has outpaced CONY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 9.75% total return against -40.99%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: AMZY has compounded at 21.99% a year, against 8.26% for CONY. AMZY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 25.4% against 60.9% for CONY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualizedSince Aug 2023Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
AMZY7.51%9.75%21.99%18.94%25.4%0.610.88-23.7%
CONY-17.42%-40.99%8.26%7.75%60.9%0.060.08-67.4%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Aug 2023” measures every fund from August 15, 2023 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Distribution rate, SEC yield and return of capital

MetricAMZYCONY
Forward distribution rate24.92%68.65%
Trailing 12-month yield49.91%127.95%
30-day SEC yield3.12%2.52%
Return of capital0.00%88.09%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Total return against the stated underlying is on AMZY vs AMZN, CONY vs COIN.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricAMZYCONY
Full nameYieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETFYieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Underlying indexAmazon (AMZN)Coinbase (COIN)
Last Close$10.31 as of October 2, 2026$19.52 as of October 2, 2026
Distribution rate24.92%68.65%
Trailing 12-month yield49.91%127.95%
30-day SEC yield3.12%2.52%
Distribution Safety Score™ 5662
Safety-Adjusted Yield 13.96%42.56%
Expense ratio1.09%1.04%
AUM$211M$392M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
ObjectiveYieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF seeks current income while providing indirect exposure to the share price returns of Amazon.com, Inc. common stock, subject to a limit on potential investment gains. The fund does not invest directly in Amazon.com, Inc.; it uses a synthetic covered call strategy built from standardized exchange-traded options.YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF seeks current income while providing indirect exposure to the share price returns of Coinbase Global, Inc. common stock, subject to a limit on potential investment gains. The fund does not invest directly in Coinbase Global, Inc.; it uses a synthetic covered call strategy built from standardized exchange-traded options.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date07/24/202308/14/2023
Beta1.162.83
Last dividend$0.0494 payable today$0.2577 payable today
Ex-dividend date10/01/202610/01/2026

Bottom lineChoose AMZY if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout. Choose CONY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 68.65%, generated by selling options premium. AMZY and CONY both use option or derivative overlays. Their tradeoff is the underlying exposure, how each option strategy is implemented, and the yield each targets; either overlay can limit upside participation, so neither offers uncapped price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. AMZY and CONY generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs62
Total AUM$10.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AMZY and CONY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

CONY offers the higher yield at 68.65% vs 24.92% for AMZY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

CONY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 1.04% compared to 1.09%.

They have different reference exposures: AMZY is linked to Amazon (AMZN) while CONY is linked to Coinbase (COIN), which means their performance drivers differ.

CONY is the larger fund by assets ($392M), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose AMZY

YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF

  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 1.2 vs 2.8 for CONY.

Choose CONY

YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — CONY distributes roughly 68.65% from selling options premium, vs 24.92% for AMZY.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 1.04% expense ratio vs 1.09% for AMZY.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, AMZY would generate roughly $47.92 cash per distribution, while CONY would produce $132.02 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

AMZY yield24.92%
CONY yield68.65%
Cash diff on $10K$84.10

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, AMZY would cost approximately $1,090 in fees vs $1,040 for CONY (simplified, not compounded). The $50.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

AMZY ER1.09%
CONY ER1.04%

Strategy & risk

AMZY tracks Amazon (AMZN) with a covered call approach, while CONY uses Coinbase (COIN) as its reference exposure with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.16 for AMZY and 2.83 for CONY, making AMZY the less volatile of the two by this measure.

AMZY beta1.16
CONY beta2.83

Fund details

AMZY is managed by YieldMax (launched 07/24/2023) with $211M in assets. CONY is managed by YieldMax (launched 08/14/2023) with $392M in assets.

AMZY AUM$211M
CONY AUM$392M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for AMZY and CONY?

AMZY currently distributes 24.92% and CONY 68.65%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is AMZY or CONY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. CONY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between AMZY and CONY?

AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Amazon (AMZN) with a covered call approach, while CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) uses Coinbase (COIN) as its reference exposure with a covered call approach. They are issued by YieldMax and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both AMZY and CONY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is AMZY or CONY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — CONY scores 62, AMZY scores 56, so CONY's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. AMZY has also shown lower price volatility (beta 1.16 vs 2.83 for CONY). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, AMZY or CONY?

AMZY has an expense ratio of 1.09% while CONY charges 1.04%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in AMZY vs CONY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in AMZY would generate roughly $47.92 cash per distribution ($2,492.00 annually). The same in CONY would produce about $132.02 cash per distribution ($6,865.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, AMZY or CONY?

AMZY has outpaced CONY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 9.75% total return against -40.99%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: AMZY has compounded at 21.99% a year, against 8.26% for CONY. AMZY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 25.4% against 60.9% for CONY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

AMZY vs CONY — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Overview

AMZY and CONY are both YieldMax ETFs using synthetic covered call strategies on single stocks—Amazon and Coinbase, respectively. They generate income by selling call options against their underlying holdings, capping upside in exchange for weekly distributions. The critical difference is volatility and payout rate: AMZY targets Amazon's relatively stable equity, while CONY targets Coinbase, a crypto-exposed company with much higher price swings and a substantially higher distribution yield.

How they differ

CONY's distribution rate of 68.65% dwarfs AMZY's 24.92%, a gap driven by Coinbase's elevated volatility (2.83 beta versus 1.16 for AMZY), which allows call-option sellers to pocket higher premiums. CONY also holds a larger asset base at $392M compared to $211M, though both remain modest. Expense ratios are nearly identical—1.04% for CONY and 1.09% for AMZY—so the yield spread reflects the underlying volatility profile, not fee differences. Both pay weekly, but CONY's price of $19.52 sits higher than AMZY's $10.31, partly reflecting Coinbase's intrinsic valuation.

Who each is best for

AMZY: Fits investors comfortable with single-stock leverage (1.16 beta) who want meaningful income from Amazon exposure without the upside cap feeling too constraining, given Amazon's historical growth profile is more modest than crypto volatility.

CONY: Fits investors who prioritize yield and understand that Coinbase's 2.83 beta means both call premium opportunities and sharp drawdown risk, accepting capped gains as a tradeoff for the 68.65% payout.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yields. CONY's 68.65% distribution rate suggests the fund is returning roughly two-thirds of its price each year; if Coinbase's equity value does not appreciate, or if option-premium generation slows, distributions will eventually draw down net asset value.
  • Single-stock and single-sector concentration. AMZY holds only Amazon; CONY holds only Coinbase (with indirect crypto exposure). A sharp selloff in either underlying, or sector-wide declines, cannot be offset by diversification within the fund.
  • Covered call cap on appreciation. Both funds cap your upside at the strike price of the calls sold each week. If Amazon or Coinbase rallies sharply, your gains are capped while you continue receiving the option premium; this is the inverse of owning the stock outright.
  • Crypto regulatory and adoption risk specific to CONY. Coinbase's business depends on cryptocurrency adoption, regulatory acceptance, and trading volumes. A regulatory crackdown or prolonged crypto downturn could impair both the underlying stock price and the premium available to call sellers.
  • Options and synthetic structure risk. Both funds rely on liquid options markets and counterparty performance. If options liquidity dries up or the synthetic structure breaks down, the fund's ability to execute its strategy and distribute income is at risk.

Bottom line

If you want Amazon exposure with a modest income boost, AMZY offers a more conservative yield profile aligned with a mature tech stock's profile. If maximizing current income is your priority and you can tolerate Coinbase's volatility swings and regulatory uncertainty, CONY's 68.65% yield is the main draw—but understand that yield comes from capping gains and betting that premiums remain available week to week. Past performance does not predict future results; covered-call cap structures and single-stock risk should be weighed carefully against your overall portfolio and time horizon.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.