DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

KQQQ vs QQQ: Own the Nasdaq-100, or Sell Some Upside for Cash?

A head-to-head of Kurv Technology Titans Select and Invesco QQQ covering overlay, cost, and why only one pays a large distribution.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • KQQQInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 14.31%, generated by selling options premium.
  • QQQInvestors who want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

KQQQ has lagged QQQ over the trailing twelve months, posting a 18.49% total return against 24.14%. Measured from Jul 2024 — the start of shared available history — QQQ has compounded at 22.43% a year versus 21.34% for KQQQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Jul 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
KQQQ17.94%18.49%21.34%20.1%0.620.90-17.3%
QQQ21.07%24.14%22.43%19.9%0.861.24-12.0%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jul 2024” measures every fund from July 23, 2024 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Distribution rate and SEC yield

MetricKQQQQQQ
Forward distribution rate14.31%0.41%
Trailing 12-month yield15.47%0.42%
30-day SEC yield0.42%—

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricKQQQQQQ
Full nameKurv Technology Titans Select ETFInvesco QQQ Trust
IssuerKurvInvesco
Underlying indexBasket (Technology Stocks)Nasdaq-100 Index
Last Close$29.34 as of September 30, 2026$739.77 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate14.31%0.41%
Trailing 12-month yield15.47%0.42%
30-day SEC yield0.42%—
Distribution Safety Score™ 9497
Safety-Adjusted Yield 13.45%0.40%
Expense ratio0.99%0.18%
AUM$136M$501B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyQuarterly
ObjectiveKurv Technology Titans Select ETF seeks to maximize total return by actively managing a portfolio with concentrated exposure to high-conviction technology titans while, at the same time, generating potentially tax-efficient income.Track the Nasdaq-100 Index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq stocks.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date07/22/202403/10/1999
Beta1.34851.26
Last dividend$0.35$0.75143 declared, pays 10/08/2026
Ex-dividend date09/23/202609/21/2026

Bottom lineChoose KQQQ if you want to maximize current income — roughly 14.31%, generated by selling options premium. Choose QQQ if you want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside. There's no free lunch: KQQQ's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while QQQ keeps full price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. KQQQ generates income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs16
Total AUM$644M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Kurv is known for developing actively managed, single-stock and thematic covered call ETFs that generate income through options strategies. The issuer's lineup spans fixed income, growth and income, precious metals strategies, and thematic investing approaches, with a notable focus on single-stock income products tied to mega-cap technology and consumer companies. Kurv's breadth includes both traditional covered call strategies and more specialized offerings in metals and sector-specific themes, appealing to investors seeking equity income across various market segments.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on KQQQ.

ETFs246
Total AUM$1013B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major ETF provider known for offering a comprehensive lineup spanning multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company specializes in income-focused products including dividend, covered call, and bond strategies, while also maintaining broad exposure across equity, factor-based, thematic, and ESG investing themes. Invesco's portfolio ranges from index-tracking funds to alternatives and specialized offerings like digital assets and BulletShares, making it one of the more expansive ETF families available to investors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQ.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

KQQQ offers the higher yield at 14.31% vs 0.41% for QQQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

QQQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.18% compared to 0.99%.

They have different reference exposures: KQQQ is linked to Basket (Technology Stocks) while QQQ is linked to Nasdaq-100 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

QQQ is the larger fund by assets ($501B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose KQQQ

Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — KQQQ distributes roughly 14.31% from selling options premium, vs 0.41% for QQQ.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Choose QQQ

Invesco QQQ Trust

  • Want a growth tilt and can accept larger swings for more upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.18% expense ratio vs 0.99% for KQQQ.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, KQQQ would generate roughly $119.25 cash per distribution, while QQQ would produce $10.25 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

KQQQ yield14.31%
QQQ yield0.41%
Cash diff on $10K$109.00

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, KQQQ would cost approximately $990 in fees vs $180 for QQQ (simplified, not compounded). The $810.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

KQQQ ER0.99%
QQQ ER0.18%

Strategy & risk

KQQQ tracks Basket (Technology Stocks) with a growth approach, while QQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach. Beta is 1.3485 for KQQQ and 1.26 for QQQ, making QQQ the less volatile of the two by this measure.

KQQQ beta1.3485
QQQ beta1.26

Fund details

KQQQ is managed by Kurv (launched 07/22/2024) with $136M in assets. QQQ is managed by Invesco (launched 03/10/1999) with $501B in assets.

KQQQ AUM$136M
QQQ AUM$501B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between KQQQ and QQQ?

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) tracks Nasdaq-100 Index and keeps the whole move. KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) sells some of that upside for cash. That is why KQQQ distributes 14.31% against 0.41% and costs 0.99% against 0.18%. Figures as of September 2026. The larger yield is upside sold, not a safer Nasdaq.

What is the current distribution rate for KQQQ and QQQ?

KQQQ currently distributes 14.31% and QQQ 0.41%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is KQQQ or QQQ better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. KQQQ currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both KQQQ and QQQ?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is KQQQ or QQQ safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — QQQ scores 97, KQQQ scores 94, so QQQ's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, KQQQ or QQQ?

KQQQ has an expense ratio of 0.99% while QQQ charges 0.18%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in KQQQ vs QQQ generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in KQQQ would generate roughly $119.25 cash per distribution ($1,431.00 annually). The same in QQQ would produce about $10.25 cash per distribution ($41.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, KQQQ or QQQ?

KQQQ has lagged QQQ over the trailing twelve months, posting a 18.49% total return against 24.14%. Measured from Jul 2024 — the start of shared available history — QQQ has compounded at 22.43% a year versus 21.34% for KQQQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

KQQQ vs QQQ — at a glance

Generated September 26, 2026.

Overview

KQQQ and QQQ both target large-cap technology stocks, but they pursue radically different strategies. QQQ is a passive index tracker of the Nasdaq-100, delivering broad exposure to 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq companies. KQQQ is an actively managed ETF with concentrated holdings in a smaller basket of technology titans, layered with a derivative overlay designed to generate outsized income.

How they differ

The biggest difference is distribution strategy. That overlay introduces leverage and options exposure that QQQ avoids entirely; QQQ holds stocks directly, while KQQQ uses synthetic strategies to amplify income generation.

The second major difference is scale and cost. QQQ operates at $501B with an expense ratio of 0.18%, making it one of the world's largest technology ETFs. KQQQ is much smaller at $136M and charges 0.99%. The cost gap narrows at larger KQQQ, but the structural difference persists: passive indexing versus active management with derivatives.

Third, concentration and volatility differ materially. QQQ holds 100 stocks across the Nasdaq-100 with a beta of 1.26. KQQQ targets a smaller basket of high-conviction names with higher beta of 1.3485, making it more volatile and concentrated. KQQQ's shorter track record (inception 07/22/2024) also means less historical evidence of how the strategy performs across market cycles versus QQQ's 2 years of live data.

Who each is best for

  • QQQ: Fits investors seeking broad Nasdaq-100 exposure with minimal income expectations, low fees, and a passive buy-and-hold approach over long periods.
  • KQQQ: Fits investors who want to concentrate capital in hand-picked large-cap technology stocks and need monthly cash distributions, accepting higher complexity and amplified price volatility in exchange.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yields. KQQQ's 14.31% yield is nearly 36 times that of QQQ. Yields this high often rely on return-of-capital distributions or capital erosion; if the underlying portfolio does not grow enough to support payouts, the fund's net asset value is likely to decline over time.
  • Derivative and leverage risk. KQQQ uses a derivative overlay to amplify income; if the options or synthetic strategies misprize, realize volatility spikes, or encounter adverse market moves, the fund's performance can diverge sharply from its underlying technology holdings. Leverage magnifies both gains and losses.
  • Concentration risk. KQQQ holds fewer, hand-picked names versus QQQ's 100-stock diversification. If those concentrated bets underperform or face company-specific pressure, KQQQ has less cushion from other positions.
  • Beta amplification. KQQQ's beta of 1.3485 exceeds QQQ's 1.26, meaning it swings harder in both bull and bear markets. During downturns, this magnifies losses; during rallies, it magnifies gains.
  • Track record brevity. KQQQ started in 07/22/2024, giving it only months of performance data. QQQ has 27 years of history, providing evidence of how it performs across recessions, rallies, and rate cycles. The yield gap reflects added complexity, not hidden alpha—compare the risk and cost carefully. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.