ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
KraneShares is known for offering thematic and alternatives-focused ETFs that target specialized investment areas beyond traditional equity and fixed income categories. The firm's four-fund lineup spans alternatives, income, and thematic strategies, with notable tickers including KWEB (a China-focused technology fund) and KIQQ (a nasdaq-100 covered call strategy), alongside positions in emerging sectors like cryptocurrency and commodities. The issuer carves out a niche by combining international exposure, particularly to Chinese markets, with modern income-generation strategies like covered calls.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on KWEB.
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Invesco is a major player in the ETF space known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of 71 funds spanning multiple investment themes and strategies. Their portfolio spans income-focused funds, factor-based equity strategies, commodity exposure, digital assets, ESG investing, and the popular Invesco QQQ family tracking the Nasdaq-100, serving both income-seeking and growth-oriented investors. The issuer is particularly recognized for specialized offerings like BulletShares (laddered bond funds), sector rotation strategies, and thematic investing options, making it a comprehensive choice for investors seeking varied exposures beyond traditional index funds.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQ.
Seeks to provide investment results that correspond to the price and yield performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet Index.
Track the Nasdaq-100 Index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq stocks.
Asset class
Equity
Equity
Inception date
07/31/2013
03/10/1999
Beta
0.88
1.24
Last dividend
$2.0960
$0.7941
Ex-dividend date
12/22/2025
12/21/2026
Bottom lineChoose KWEB if you want higher current income (7.63% vs 0.45% for QQQ). Choose QQQ if you want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside.
Most used
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
Want to go deeper?
Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Total returns
KWEB has lagged QQQ over the trailing twelve months, posting a -18.20% total return against 27.41%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: QQQ has compounded at 21.08% a year, against 0.06% for KWEB. QQQ has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 20.3% against 34.5% for KWEB. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 16, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Aug 2013” measures every fund from August 1, 2013 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Quick verdict
KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.
KWEB offers the higher yield at 7.63% vs 0.45% for QQQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.
QQQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.18% compared to 0.69%.
They track different benchmarks: KWEB is linked to CSI Overseas China Internet Index while QQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.
QQQ is the larger fund by assets ($481B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.
Who should choose each?
Choose KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Want higher current income — KWEB yields 7.63% vs 0.45% for QQQ.
Want broad equity exposure.
Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.9 vs 1.2 for QQQ.
Choose QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
Want a growth tilt and can accept larger swings for more upside.
Want to keep costs low — a 0.18% expense ratio vs 0.69% for KWEB.
Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment, KWEB would generate roughly $63.58/month, while QQQ would produce $3.75/month, at current distribution rates.
KWEB yield7.63%
QQQ yield0.45%
Monthly diff on $10K$59.83
Cost & efficiency
Over 10 years on $10,000, KWEB would cost approximately $690 in fees vs $180 for QQQ (simplified, not compounded). The $510.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.
KWEB ER0.69%
QQQ ER0.18%
Strategy & risk
KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index with an international approach, while QQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach. Beta is 0.88 for KWEB and 1.24 for QQQ, indicating KWEB is less volatile relative to the market.
KWEB beta0.88
QQQ beta1.24
Fund details
KWEB is managed by KraneShares (launched 07/31/2013) with $6.18B in assets. QQQ is managed by Invesco (launched 03/10/1999) with $481B in assets.
Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.
Frequently asked questions
Is KWEB or QQQ better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. KWEB currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
What is the difference between KWEB and QQQ?
KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index with an international approach, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach. They are issued by KraneShares and Invesco respectively.
Can I hold both KWEB and QQQ?
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
Which has lower fees, KWEB or QQQ?
KWEB has an expense ratio of 0.69% while QQQ charges 0.18%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.
How much income does $10,000 in KWEB vs QQQ generate?
At current rates, $10,000 in KWEB would generate roughly $63.58 per month ($763.00 annually). The same in QQQ would produce about $3.75 per month ($45.00 annually).
Which has performed better historically, KWEB or QQQ?
KWEB has lagged QQQ over the trailing twelve months, posting a -18.20% total return against 27.41%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: QQQ has compounded at 21.08% a year, against 0.06% for KWEB. QQQ has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 20.3% against 34.5% for KWEB. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore related screeners
Lateral filters that include these funds — browse the full peer set on DividendVision.
Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio
See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.
