DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

LOFF vs XSPC: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF and VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated September 30, 2026

No track record yet. LOFF, XSPC launched within the last six months. Where a fund has not published a payout, the forward distribution rate is left blank.

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

LOFF has lagged XSPC over the shared window since Jun 2026, posting a -55.70% total return against -17.58%. XSPC has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 51.4% against 157.6% for LOFF. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolSince Jun 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
LOFF-55.70%157.6%-1.81-2.26-75.3%
XSPC-17.58%51.4%-1.40-1.96-30.8%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jun 2026” measures every fund from June 16, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Jun 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Jun 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricLOFFXSPC
Full nameDirexion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETFVegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF
IssuerDirexionVegaShares
Last Close$16.90 as of September 30, 2026$20.75 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate0.57%—
Trailing 12-month yield0.20%—
Distribution Safety Score™ 50—
Expense ratio0.97%0.75%
AUM$68.2M$2.13M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyNone
Underlying indexSpaceX (SPCX)—
Objective—Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date06/15/202606/15/2026
Last dividend$0.024—
Ex-dividend date09/22/2026—

— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because XSPC launched June 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineWe won't call this one: LOFF launched June 2026 and XSPC launched June 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Daily leverage reset. LOFF targets a multiple of the index's DAILY move, resetting every session. Over weeks and months the compounding of daily resets (volatility decay) can drag returns far below the stated multiple, especially in choppy markets — and losses are magnified the same way gains are.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs132
Total AUM$72.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Direxion is known for offering leveraged and inverse ETFs that enable investors to amplify or hedge market exposure across various asset classes and market segments. The firm's fund lineup focuses primarily on income-generating strategies and leveraged products, featuring both daily leveraged long positions and inverse (bearish) funds designed for tactical trading and hedging purposes. The issuer maintains a broad range of tickers covering sectors, commodities, cryptocurrencies, and equity indices, appealing to active traders and investors seeking non-traditional exposure management tools.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on LOFF.

ETFs6
Total AUM$64.4M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VegaShares specializes in options-based and thematic ETFs designed to generate income and capitalize on emerging trends. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused strategies, including covered call funds, alongside thematic offerings that target specific market segments and innovation themes. VegaShares serves investors seeking alternative approaches to traditional equity exposure, with a concentrated portfolio of strategically named funds addressing both income generation and sector-specific growth opportunities.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XSPC.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

LOFF (Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF) and XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

LOFF currently shows a 0.57% distribution yield. XSPC has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

XSPC is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.75% compared to 0.97%.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, LOFF would generate roughly $14.25 cash per distribution, while XSPC has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

LOFF yield0.57%
XSPC yield—

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, LOFF would cost approximately $970 in fees vs $750 for XSPC (simplified, not compounded). The $220.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

LOFF ER0.97%
XSPC ER0.75%

Strategy & risk

LOFF tracks SpaceX (SPCX) with a leverage approach, while XSPC is an ETF built around a thematic strategy.

Fund details

LOFF is managed by Direxion (launched 06/15/2026) with $68.2M in assets. XSPC is managed by VegaShares (launched 06/15/2026) with $2.13M in assets.

LOFF AUM$68.2M
XSPC AUM$2.13M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of LOFF or XSPC pays more dividend income?

LOFF currently reports a distribution yield, while XSPC has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between LOFF and XSPC?

LOFF (Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF) tracks SpaceX (SPCX) with a leverage approach, while XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) is an ETF built around a thematic strategy. They are issued by Direxion and VegaShares respectively.

Can I hold both LOFF and XSPC?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, LOFF or XSPC?

LOFF has an expense ratio of 0.97% while XSPC charges 0.75%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in LOFF vs XSPC generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in LOFF would generate roughly $14.25 cash per distribution ($57.00 annually). XSPC has not established a distribution history yet, so a cash estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, LOFF or XSPC?

LOFF has lagged XSPC over the shared window since Jun 2026, posting a -55.70% total return against -17.58%. XSPC has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 51.4% against 157.6% for LOFF. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

LOFF vs XSPC — at a glance

Generated September 26, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

LOFF and XSPC are both newly launched space-themed ETFs with inception dates of 06/15/2026, but they pursue fundamentally different strategies. LOFF is a 2X leveraged fund tracking SpaceX directly, while XSPC is an unlevered thematic ETF providing broader exposure to space and beyond-Earth-related companies. The core distinction is leverage and single-stock concentration versus diversified thematic exposure.

How they differ

LOFF employs 2X daily leverage on SpaceX alone, amplifying both upside and downside moves relative to the underlying stock, while XSPC holds a basket of space-economy companies without leverage. This is the single most consequential structural difference: LOFF's leverage compounds daily and resets, meaning its long-term return profile diverges materially from 2X the underlying asset's return; XSPC simply tracks its broader index without that drag. LOFF's yield suggests it is generating income from the leveraged SpaceX position, while XSPC focuses on capital appreciation.

Who each is best for

LOFF: Fits investors with high risk tolerance seeking amplified exposure to SpaceX price movements over short time horizons, who understand leveraged ETF mechanics and are willing to accept the daily rebalancing drag and potential NAV erosion inherent in leveraged structures.

XSPC: Designed for investors seeking thematic allocation to space-economy companies without leverage, preferring diversification across the sector over single-stock concentration and accepting that distributions may not be a near-term feature of the fund.

Key risks to know

  • Leverage compounding and NAV decay: LOFF's 2X daily leverage resets daily, meaning long-term returns will lag 2X the underlying return in sideways or volatile markets. In extended bull or bear runs, decay can be significant; this is independent of SpaceX's fundamental performance.
  • Single-stock concentration in LOFF: Holding only SpaceX eliminates diversification within the space theme. A single adverse event—regulatory action, operational setback, or valuation correction—affects the entire fund. XSPC spreads this risk across multiple space-economy businesses.
  • Derivative and liquidity risk: LOFF's leverage mechanism relies on derivatives and borrowing, creating counterparty exposure and amplifying losses during market stress.
  • Nascent thematic classification: Both funds track a newly crystallized sector (commercial space), where business models, regulatory environments, and long-term profitability remain uncertain. Neither has a performance track record long enough to validate strategy durability.

Bottom line

If you want amplified exposure to SpaceX specifically and can tolerate daily compounding decay and leverage risk, LOFF offers that trade-off; if you prefer diversified space-economy exposure without leverage and accept no distribution income, XSPC aligns with that approach. Both funds are very young and operate at modest asset bases, so trading liquidity and structural stability merit direct verification before committing capital. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.