DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

PPA vs XSPC: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF and VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated September 18, 2026

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings.

PPA has outpaced XSPC over the shared window since Jun 2026, posting a -9.40% total return against -16.52%. PPA has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 19.9% against 53.8% for XSPC. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolSince Jun 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
PPA-9.40%19.9%-2.15-2.71-13.8%
XSPC-16.52%53.8%-1.41-1.97-30.8%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 18, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since Jun 2026” measures every fund from June 16, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Jun 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Jun 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricPPAXSPC
Full nameInvesco Aerospace & Defense ETFVegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF
IssuerInvescoVegaShares
Last Close$159.78 as of September 18, 2026$21.01 as of September 18, 2026
Distribution rate0.34%
Distribution Safety Score™ 69
Safety-Adjusted Yield 0.23%
Expense ratio0.58%0.75%
AUM$7.64B$2.12M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyNone
Underlying index
ObjectiveProvide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/26/200506/15/2026
Beta0.86
Last dividend$0.136
Ex-dividend date06/22/2026

— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because XSPC launched June 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineWe won't call this one: XSPC launched June 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs246
Total AUM$980B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major ETF provider known for offering a comprehensive lineup spanning multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company specializes in income-focused products including dividend, covered call, and bond strategies, while also maintaining broad exposure across equity, factor-based, thematic, and ESG investing themes. Invesco's portfolio ranges from index-tracking funds to alternatives and specialized offerings like digital assets and BulletShares, making it one of the more expansive ETF families available to investors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on PPA.

ETFs5
Total AUM$60.9M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VegaShares specializes in options-based and thematic ETFs designed to generate income and capitalize on emerging trends. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused strategies, including covered call funds, alongside thematic offerings that target specific market segments and innovation themes. VegaShares serves investors seeking alternative approaches to traditional equity exposure, with a concentrated portfolio of strategically named funds addressing both income generation and sector-specific growth opportunities.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XSPC.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) and XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

PPA currently shows a 0.34% distribution yield. XSPC has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

PPA is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.58% compared to 0.75%.

PPA has $7.64B in assets vs $2.12M for XSPC, but XSPC only launched June 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, PPA would generate roughly $2.83/month, while XSPC has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

PPA yield0.34%
XSPC yield

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, PPA would cost approximately $580 in fees vs $750 for XSPC (simplified, not compounded). The $170.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

PPA ER0.58%
XSPC ER0.75%

Strategy & risk

PPA is an ETF built around industrials exposure, while XSPC is an ETF built around a thematic strategy.

PPA beta0.86
XSPC beta

Fund details

PPA is managed by Invesco (launched 10/26/2005) with $7.64B in assets. XSPC is managed by VegaShares (launched 06/15/2026) with $2.12M in assets.

PPA AUM$7.64B
XSPC AUM$2.12M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of PPA or XSPC pays more dividend income?

PPA currently reports a distribution yield, while XSPC has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between PPA and XSPC?

PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) is an ETF built around industrials exposure, while XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) is an ETF built around a thematic strategy. They are issued by Invesco and VegaShares respectively.

Can I hold both PPA and XSPC?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, PPA or XSPC?

PPA has an expense ratio of 0.58% while XSPC charges 0.75%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in PPA vs XSPC generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in PPA would generate roughly $2.83 per month ($34.00 annually). XSPC has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, PPA or XSPC?

PPA has outpaced XSPC over the shared window since Jun 2026, posting a -9.40% total return against -16.52%. PPA has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 19.9% against 53.8% for XSPC. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

PPA vs XSPC — at a glance

Generated September 19, 2026.

Overview

PPA is a broad aerospace and defense equity ETF with $7.64B in assets, tracking established defense contractors and suppliers across the industry. XSPC is a thematic space-economy ETF launched 06/15/2026 with $2.12M in assets, focused on companies involved in space infrastructure and commercial space activities. The fundamental difference is scope: PPA captures the legacy defense industrial base, while XSPC targets emerging commercial space ventures.

How they differ

PPA holds diversified aerospace and defense names—the established, capital-intensive contractors that dominate government spending. XSPC concentrates on companies engaged in space technology, launch services, satellite communications, and related space-economy themes, a narrower and newer sector. PPA's 0.58% expense ratio is 17 basis points cheaper than XSPC's 0.75%, and PPA's $7.64B in assets dwarfs XSPC's $2.12M, reflecting the difference between an established large-cap fund and a micro-cap thematic play. PPA carries a 0.86 beta, indicating less sensitivity to broad market swings than an index with a beta of 1.0.

Who each is best for

PPA: Fits investors seeking steady exposure to aerospace and defense as a core industrials holding, comfortable with mature, government-contracting-dependent businesses and modest dividend income.

XSPC: Designed for investors pursuing concentrated thematic exposure to commercial space development and orbital economy growth, willing to accept micro-cap liquidity constraints and no current income in exchange for sector specificity.

  • Government spending dependency for PPA. Defense contractor revenues hinge on federal budget cycles, budget battles, and geopolitical shifts. A major reduction in defense appropriations would pressure valuations across the portfolio.
  • Commercial space viability for XSPC. Most companies in the space-economy theme are early-stage or unprofitable. Business models for satellite internet, space tourism, and in-orbit manufacturing remain unproven, and competitive pressures from larger technology firms are rising.
  • Sector overlap and valuation divergence. Both funds include space-related holdings, so their returns may track together during space-sector rallies but diverge sharply if commercial space falters while traditional defense spending holds steady—or vice versa. If you're pursuing concentrated bets on the emerging commercial space industry and can tolerate micro-cap volatility and illiquidity, XSPC's focused mandate aligns with that thesis. Verify holdings overlap before combining them, and remember that past performance in either space or defense does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.