DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

QDVO vs QQQ: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • QDVOInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 11.18%, generated by selling options premium.
  • QQQInvestors who want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

QDVO has lagged QQQ over the trailing twelve months, posting a 13.84% total return against 24.14%. Measured from Aug 2024 — the start of shared available history — QQQ has compounded at 24.11% a year versus 20.76% for QDVO. QDVO has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 13.3% against 19.9% for QQQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Aug 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
QDVO10.58%13.84%20.76%13.3%0.630.92-10.2%
QQQ21.07%24.14%24.11%19.9%0.861.24-12.0%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Aug 2024” measures every fund from August 22, 2024 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricQDVOQQQ
Full nameAmplify CWP Growth & Income ETFInvesco QQQ Trust
IssuerAmplify ETFsInvesco
Underlying indexU.S. large-cap value / dividend equities with a covered call overlayNasdaq-100 Index
Last Close$29.90 as of September 30, 2026$739.77 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate11.18%0.41%
Trailing 12-month yield10.53%0.42%
Distribution Safety Score™ 8497
Safety-Adjusted Yield 9.39%0.40%
Expense ratio0.56%0.18%
AUM$779M$501B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyQuarterly
ObjectiveSeeks to provide high monthly income with the potential for capital appreciation by investing in quality U.S. dividend-paying equities and writing covered call options on those holdings.Track the Nasdaq-100 Index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq stocks.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date08/21/202403/10/1999
Beta0.93381.26
Last dividend$0.27866 payable today$0.75143 declared, pays 10/08/2026
Ex-dividend date09/29/202609/21/2026

Bottom lineChoose QDVO if you want to maximize current income — roughly 11.18%, generated by selling options premium. Choose QQQ if you want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside. There's no free lunch: QDVO's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while QQQ keeps full price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. QDVO generates income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs46
Total AUM$16.8B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Amplify ETFs is known for offering specialized, thematic investment solutions across diverse market segments including digital assets, commodities, and dividend strategies. The issuer's lineup spans multiple fund families covering income-focused strategies, covered call approaches, commodity exposure, and thematic sectors such as cybersecurity, blockchain, gaming, and sustainable investing. Notable for tickers like BLOK (blockchain), HACK (cybersecurity), and DIVO (dividend), Amplify combines traditional income strategies with alternative themes and emerging asset classes, appealing to investors seeking both yield and exposure to innovation-driven sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QDVO.

ETFs246
Total AUM$1013B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major ETF provider known for offering a comprehensive lineup spanning multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company specializes in income-focused products including dividend, covered call, and bond strategies, while also maintaining broad exposure across equity, factor-based, thematic, and ESG investing themes. Invesco's portfolio ranges from index-tracking funds to alternatives and specialized offerings like digital assets and BulletShares, making it one of the more expansive ETF families available to investors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQ.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

QDVO offers the higher yield at 11.18% vs 0.41% for QQQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

QQQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.18% compared to 0.56%.

They have different reference exposures: QDVO is linked to U.S. large-cap value / dividend equities with a covered call overlay while QQQ is linked to Nasdaq-100 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

QQQ is the larger fund by assets ($501B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose QDVO

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — QDVO distributes roughly 11.18% from selling options premium, vs 0.41% for QQQ.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.9 vs 1.3 for QQQ.

Choose QQQ

Invesco QQQ Trust

  • Want a growth tilt and can accept larger swings for more upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.18% expense ratio vs 0.56% for QDVO.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, QDVO would generate roughly $93.17 cash per distribution, while QQQ would produce $10.25 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

QDVO yield11.18%
QQQ yield0.41%
Cash diff on $10K$82.92

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, QDVO would cost approximately $560 in fees vs $180 for QQQ (simplified, not compounded). The $380.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

QDVO ER0.56%
QQQ ER0.18%

Strategy & risk

QDVO tracks U.S. large-cap value / dividend equities with a covered call overlay with an options approach, while QQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach. Beta is 0.9338 for QDVO and 1.26 for QQQ, making QDVO the less volatile of the two by this measure.

QDVO beta0.9338
QQQ beta1.26

Fund details

QDVO is managed by Amplify ETFs (launched 08/21/2024) with $779M in assets. QQQ is managed by Invesco (launched 03/10/1999) with $501B in assets.

QDVO AUM$779M
QQQ AUM$501B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for QDVO and QQQ?

QDVO currently distributes 11.18% and QQQ 0.41%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is QDVO or QQQ better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. QDVO currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between QDVO and QQQ?

QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) tracks U.S. large-cap value / dividend equities with a covered call overlay with an options approach, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach. They are issued by Amplify ETFs and Invesco respectively.

Can I hold both QDVO and QQQ?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is QDVO or QQQ safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — QQQ scores 97, QDVO scores 84, so QQQ's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. QDVO has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.93 vs 1.26 for QQQ). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, QDVO or QQQ?

QDVO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while QQQ charges 0.18%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in QDVO vs QQQ generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in QDVO would generate roughly $93.17 cash per distribution ($1,118.00 annually). The same in QQQ would produce about $10.25 cash per distribution ($41.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, QDVO or QQQ?

QDVO has lagged QQQ over the trailing twelve months, posting a 13.84% total return against 24.14%. Measured from Aug 2024 — the start of shared available history — QQQ has compounded at 24.11% a year versus 20.76% for QDVO. QDVO has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 13.3% against 19.9% for QQQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare QDVO with

People also compare QQQ with

Popular comparisons

Dividend dates and history

QDVO vs QQQ — at a glance

Generated September 26, 2026.

Overview

QDVO is an actively managed covered call ETF focused on U.S. dividend-paying large-cap equities, designed to generate monthly income by selling call options against its holdings. QQQ is a passive index ETF tracking the Nasdaq-100, which emphasizes large-cap growth stocks and technology companies. The funds operate on opposite ends of the yield-and-growth spectrum: QDVO prioritizes income through options strategies, while QQQ emphasizes capital appreciation with minimal distributions.

How they differ

The biggest difference is strategy and underlying exposure. QDVO holds dividend-focused U.S. equities and actively sells covered calls to generate income, while QQQ passively tracks the Nasdaq-100's growth-oriented, tech-heavy constituents. The cost structures reflect their approaches: QDVO's 0.56% active fee is roughly triple QQQ's 0.18%, though both remain low in absolute terms. QQQ is substantially larger at $501B in assets versus QDVO's $779M, and QDVO only launched 2 years, making it an infant fund relative to QQQ's 27 years of track record. Finally, QDVO has a beta of 0.9338, meaning it moves roughly in line with the market, while QQQ's 1.26 beta suggests it amplifies broad market swings.

Who each is best for

QDVO: Fits investors seeking high monthly cash flow from equity holdings and willing to accept the structural constraint that covered calls cap upside gains in exchange for income. Also suited to those who prefer active management discipline and dividend-focused exposure over technology concentration.

QQQ: Fits investors with a long time horizon who want broad exposure to large-cap growth and technology companies with minimal ongoing distributions, prioritizing total return and capital appreciation over income. If the underlying portfolio's total return (capital gains plus dividends) falls short of distributions over time, net asset value per share will decline, meaning investors are effectively returning capital rather than living off genuine yield.

  • Covered call opportunity cost. By writing calls, QDVO systematically caps gains when the underlying holdings spike. If the dividend-paying large-cap value space rallies sharply, call-holders will be forced to sell shares, locking in a maximum return even if the equities continue appreciating.
  • Concentration risk in large-cap growth for QQQ. The Nasdaq-100 is heavily weighted toward technology and mega-cap growth stocks. A downturn concentrated in that sector could cause pronounced losses; QQQ's 1.26 amplifies market moves. Bid-ask spreads and market impact may be wider during volatile conditions.
  • Options volatility and assignment timing. QDVO's returns depend partly on when calls are assigned (called away), which depends on market moves and implied volatility. Unexpected spikes in assignment frequency or timing misalignment could disrupt the planned income stream. The choice hinges on whether your goal is harvesting steady cash flow or accumulating wealth through market exposure. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.