DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

QQQ vs VUG: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Invesco QQQ Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 2, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • QQQInvestors who want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside.
  • VUGInvestors who want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

QQQ has outpaced VUG over the trailing twelve months, posting a 24.84% total return against 14.00%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: QQQ has compounded at 21.10% a year, against 18.12% for VUG. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Jan 2004Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
QQQ22.67%24.84%28.26%16.47%21.10%15.04%20.4%1.011.46-22.8%
VUG12.87%14.00%26.46%13.89%18.12%12.42%19.7%0.971.40-22.8%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jan 2004” measures every fund from January 30, 2004 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricQQQVUG
Full nameInvesco QQQ TrustVanguard Morningstar Growth ETF
IssuerInvescoVanguard
Underlying indexNasdaq-100 IndexMorningstar US Large Cap Growth Index
Last Close$749.58 as of October 2, 2026$91.17 as of October 2, 2026
Distribution rate0.40%0.40%
Trailing 12-month yield0.41%0.38%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9790
Safety-Adjusted Yield 0.39%0.36%
Expense ratio0.18%0.03%
AUM$501B$235B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
ObjectiveTrack the Nasdaq-100 Index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq stocks.Seeks to track the Morningstar US Large Cap Growth Index.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date03/10/199901/26/2004
Beta1.261.27
Last dividend$0.75143 declared, pays 10/08/2026$0.091
Ex-dividend date09/21/202609/28/2026

Bottom lineQQQ and VUG are both for investors who want a growth tilt and can accept bigger swings for higher upside — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Cost is: VUG charges 0.03% against 0.18% for QQQ, and between two funds this similar that gap comes straight out of your return every year you hold.

Model this comparison:
Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Invesco
ETFs246
Total AUM$1012B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major ETF provider known for offering a comprehensive lineup spanning multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company specializes in income-focused products including dividend, covered call, and bond strategies, while also maintaining broad exposure across equity, factor-based, thematic, and ESG investing themes. Invesco's portfolio ranges from index-tracking funds to alternatives and specialized offerings like digital assets and BulletShares, making it one of the more expansive ETF families available to investors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQ.

See all Invesco ETFs
Vanguard
ETFs116
Total AUM$4676B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VUG.

See all Vanguard ETFs

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Quick verdict

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) and VUG (Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

VUG is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.03% compared to 0.18%.

They have different reference exposures: QQQ is linked to Nasdaq-100 Index while VUG is linked to Morningstar US Large Cap Growth Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

QQQ is the larger fund by assets ($501B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, QQQ would generate roughly $10.00 cash per distribution, while VUG would produce $10.00 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

QQQ yield0.40%
VUG yield0.40%
Cash diff on $10K$0.00

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, QQQ would cost approximately $180 in fees vs $30 for VUG (simplified, not compounded). The $150.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

QQQ ER0.18%
VUG ER0.03%

Strategy & risk

QQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach, while VUG tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Growth Index with a growth approach. Beta is 1.26 for QQQ and 1.27 for VUG — effectively similar market sensitivity.

QQQ beta1.26
VUG beta1.27

Fund details

QQQ is managed by Invesco (launched 03/10/1999) with $501B in assets. VUG is managed by Vanguard (launched 01/26/2004) with $235B in assets.

QQQ AUM$501B
VUG AUM$235B
Ready to act?
Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for QQQ and VUG?

QQQ currently distributes 0.40% and VUG 0.40%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is QQQ or VUG better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. QQQ currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between QQQ and VUG?

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach, while VUG (Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF) tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Growth Index with a growth approach. They are issued by Invesco and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both QQQ and VUG?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is QQQ or VUG safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — QQQ scores 97, VUG scores 90, so QQQ's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, QQQ or VUG?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VUG charges 0.03%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in QQQ vs VUG generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in QQQ would generate roughly $10.00 cash per distribution ($40.00 annually). The same in VUG would produce about $10.00 cash per distribution ($40.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, QQQ or VUG?

QQQ has outpaced VUG over the trailing twelve months, posting a 24.84% total return against 14.00%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: QQQ has compounded at 21.10% a year, against 18.12% for VUG. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

QQQ vs VUG — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Overview

QQQ and VUG are both large-cap growth ETFs that track their respective indexes quarterly, but they differ fundamentally in their underlying holdings and philosophy. QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index, concentrating on 100 of the largest non-financial companies traded on the Nasdaq exchange—a tech-heavy tilt by structure. VUG tracks the Morningstar US Large Cap Growth Index, which applies a broader growth-style methodology across large-cap stocks across all U.S. exchanges, allowing for more diversification outside the Nasdaq ecosystem.

How they differ

The single biggest difference is construction: QQQ's Nasdaq-100 focus naturally overweights technology and growth sectors found on that exchange, while VUG's broader index methodology selects large-cap growth stocks across the entire U.S. market regardless of listing. Both ETFs carry nearly identical betas (QQQ at 1.26, VUG at 1.27) and the same distribution rate of 0.40% paid quarterly, signaling comparable volatility and minimal income generation in either fund.

Who each is best for

QQQ: Fits investors comfortable with tech concentration who believe large Nasdaq-listed companies will outpace the broader market, and who want direct, pure exposure to the index most closely associated with U.S. technology and growth leadership.

VUG: Fits investors seeking large-cap growth exposure with lower fees and broader sector diversification across all major U.S. exchanges, trading some Nasdaq concentration for a wider net and a lower cost drag.

Key risks to know

  • Nasdaq concentration risk. QQQ's 100-stock universe concentrates exposure in technology, communication services, and consumer discretionary sectors that dominate the Nasdaq. VUG's broader universe across all exchanges reduces this sector and exchange-specific concentration, though both funds carry large-cap growth risk.
  • Sector overlap and correlation. Both indexes likely hold many of the same mega-cap technology names (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla, etc.), so differences in diversification gain may be smaller than index construction alone suggests; verify overlap before assuming meaningful risk reduction.
  • Growth-style sensitivity to rate moves. Both funds emphasize high-valuation, low-dividend growth stocks that tend to underperform when interest rates rise and investors rotate toward dividend-paying or value stocks, regardless of which index underlies them.

Bottom line

If you prioritize pure Nasdaq growth exposure and accept tech concentration for its potential upside, QQQ's scale and directness stand out; if you want broad large-cap growth with lower costs and less single-exchange risk, VUG's fee advantage and wider index become more attractive over long periods. Both funds deliver equity price appreciation, not income—neither should be viewed as a dividend vehicle. Past performance, especially during tech booms or busts, does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Dividend growth vs. high yield Yield on cost, explained How expense ratios eat returns

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

Start Free Open in Comparator Browse Screener

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.