ETF Comparison

QQQ vs XLK: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Invesco QQQ Trust and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

Invesco

ETFs255

Total AUM$971B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major player in the ETF space known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of 71 funds spanning multiple investment themes and strategies. Their portfolio spans income-focused funds, factor-based equity strategies, commodity exposure, digital assets, ESG investing, and the popular Invesco QQQ family tracking the Nasdaq-100, serving both income-seeking and growth-oriented investors. The issuer is particularly recognized for specialized offerings like BulletShares (laddered bond funds), sector rotation strategies, and thematic investing options, making it a comprehensive choice for investors seeking varied exposures beyond traditional index funds.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQ.

See all Invesco ETFs

State Street

ETFs182

Total AUM$2107B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XLK.

See all State Street ETFs

Side-by-side snapshot

	QQQ	XLK
Full name	Invesco QQQ Trust	Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
Issuer	Invesco	State Street
Last Close	$712.60 as of July 4, 2026	$180.59 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield	0.45%	0.51%
Distribution Safety Score	95	99
Expense ratio	0.18%	0.09%
AUM	$481B	$118B
Distribution frequency	Quarterly	Quarterly
Underlying index	Nasdaq-100 Index	Technology Select Sector Index
Objective	Track the Nasdaq-100 Index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq stocks.	Track the Technology Select Sector Index, providing exposure to the information technology constituents of the S&P 500.
Asset class	Equity	Equity
Inception date	03/10/1999	12/16/1998
Beta	1.23	1.42
Last dividend	$0.7941	$0.2280
Ex-dividend date	12/21/2026	09/21/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Build a sample portfolio Forecast income

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

QQQ has lagged XLK over the trailing twelve months, posting a 30.76% total return against 44.50%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: XLK has compounded at 24.87% a year, against 21.60% for QQQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Symbol	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y	10Y	Since Mar 1999	Volatility	Sharpe	Sortino	Max drawdown
QQQ	16.37%	30.76%	25.08%	15.64%	21.60%	10.81%	20.2%	0.89	1.27	-22.8%
XLK	25.30%	44.50%	28.51%	20.41%	24.87%	10.07%	24.4%	0.85	1.19	-25.7%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Mar 1999” measures every fund from March 10, 1999 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) and XLK (Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

XLK offers the higher yield at 0.51% vs 0.45% for QQQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

XLK is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.09% compared to 0.18%.

They track different benchmarks: QQQ is linked to Nasdaq-100 Index while XLK tracks Technology Select Sector Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

QQQ is the larger fund by assets ($481B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, QQQ would generate roughly $3.75/month, while XLK would produce $4.25/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

QQQ yield0.45%

XLK yield0.51%

Monthly diff on $10K$0.50

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, QQQ would cost approximately $180 in fees vs $90 for XLK (simplified, not compounded). The $90.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

QQQ ER0.18%

XLK ER0.09%

Strategy & risk

QQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach, while XLK tracks Technology Select Sector Index with a technology approach. Beta is 1.23 for QQQ and 1.42 for XLK, indicating QQQ is less volatile relative to the market.

QQQ beta1.23

XLK beta1.42

Fund details

QQQ is managed by Invesco (launched 03/10/1999) with $481B in assets. XLK is managed by State Street (launched 12/16/1998) with $118B in assets.

QQQ AUM$481B

XLK AUM$118B

Ready to act?

Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is QQQ or XLK better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. XLK currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between QQQ and XLK?

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach, while XLK (Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund) tracks Technology Select Sector Index with a technology approach. They are issued by Invesco and State Street respectively.

Can I hold both QQQ and XLK?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, QQQ or XLK?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XLK charges 0.09%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in QQQ vs XLK generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in QQQ would generate roughly $3.75 per month ($45.00 annually). The same in XLK would produce about $4.25 per month ($51.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, QQQ or XLK?

More comparisons to explore

People also compare QQQ with

People also compare XLK with

Popular comparisons

QQQ vs XLK — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

QQQ and XLK are both large-cap tech-heavy equity ETFs that track different benchmarks. QQQ holds the 100 largest non-financial Nasdaq stocks (including some industrials and healthcare names), while XLK holds only the tech constituents of the S&P 500—a narrower, sector-specific approach. The key distinction: QQQ offers broader exposure to growth-oriented mega-cap companies across multiple sectors, while XLK is pure technology sector play within a larger-cap value-tilted index.

How they differ

QQQ's Nasdaq-100 roster includes software, semiconductors, e-commerce, and biotech alongside some industrial and consumer names; XLK is exclusively tech sector stocks from the S&P 500's information technology classification. This makes XLK more concentrated in traditional IT (software, semiconductors, internet services) and excludes Nasdaq darlings like Tesla, Nvidia's newer competitors in AI infrastructure, and high-flying unprofitable growth names. QQQ carries a beta of 1.23 versus XLK's 1.42, indicating QQQ is less volatile relative to the broad market—a reflection of the S&P 500's larger weighting of defensive and financial stocks. The yield difference is modest: QQQ at 0.44% versus XLK at 0.49%, both paid quarterly. Expense ratios are rock-bottom at 0.18% for QQQ and 0.09% for XLK, though XLK's smaller $118B asset base versus QQQ's $481B means QQQ often offers tighter bid-ask spreads in practice.

Who each is best for

QQQ: Fits investors seeking diversified exposure to mega-cap growth and innovation across technology, consumer discretionary, and healthcare without a sector mandate—particularly those willing to accept higher short-term volatility for participation in fast-growing, earnings-light companies.

XLK: Fits investors who want pure technology sector exposure within the S&P 500's framework and prefer a tighter focus on established software, semiconductor, and IT services leaders—or who believe the S&P 500 tech cohort offers sufficient growth at lower valuations than Nasdaq-100 outliers.

Key risks to know

Concentration in mega-cap tech. Both funds are heavily weighted toward the "Magnificent Seven" and other mega-cap tech stocks; a downturn in semiconductor or AI-related valuations hits both hard, though QQQ's broader sector mix provides slightly more buffer.

Higher beta and valuation sensitivity. XLK's 1.42 beta means it amplifies market downturns more sharply than QQQ; both are more vulnerable to interest rate rises than the broad market because growth stocks reprice faster when discount rates climb.

Nasdaq-100 inclusion rules exclude financial stocks. QQQ's rule-based exclusion of banks and insurers means it misses dividend-heavy sectors and has a structural growth tilt—this can underperform in value-driven markets or rising-rate environments.

Sector cyclicality in XLK. Tech sector performance is historically lumpy; XLK's exclusive tech exposure means it has no auto, industrial, or healthcare buffer when software and semiconductors mean-revert.

Bottom line

If you want broad Nasdaq exposure with some diversification into non-tech growth names, QQQ's scale and lower beta offer a smoother ride; if you're committed to pure tech sector betting within large-cap fundamentals, XLK's tighter focus and lower expense ratio suit that thesis. Both are cheap, liquid, and index-based—the choice hinges on how pure a tech bet you want and your tolerance for the Nasdaq's structural growth tilt. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.