DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

QQQ vs YMAX: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Invesco QQQ Trust and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated May 20, 2026

ETFs13
Total AUM$657.4B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major asset manager recognized for developing innovative ETF solutions across diverse investment strategies. Their fund lineup focuses primarily on income generation, offering investors options that emphasize dividend yield and regular distributions. With a portfolio of four ETFs including popular tickers like PRF (Preferred Stock ETF) and QQQM (Nasdaq-100 ETF), Invesco serves both income-focused and growth-oriented investors seeking streamlined exposure to specific market segments.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQ.

ETFs62
Total AUM$9.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax specializes in options-based and income-focused ETFs, leveraging covered call and short option strategies to generate high distribution yields for investors seeking regular income. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 61 ETFs organized across nine fund families, including prominent strategies like 0DTE (zero days-to-expiration) options, covered calls, and target distribution approaches, alongside more traditional performance and portfolio-based offerings. YieldMax's holdings span major technology and financial names—including tickers like AMZY, APLY, BRKC, and FBY—and the firm targets both individual investors and those seeking enhanced yield through systematic options strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on YMAX.

Side-by-side snapshot

QQQYMAX
Full nameInvesco QQQ TrustYieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
IssuerInvescoYieldMax
Last Close$705.88 as of May 20, 2026$8.38 as of May 20, 2026
Distribution yield0.40%59.88%
Expense ratio0.18%1.33%
AUM$440.3B$390M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyWeekly
Underlying indexNasdaq-100 IndexBasket (Yieldmax ETFs)
ObjectiveTrack the Nasdaq-100 Index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq stocks.Covered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date03/10/199901/16/2024
Beta1.18—
Last dividend$0.73$0.09
Ex-dividend date03/23/202605/13/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) and YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

YMAX offers the higher yield at 59.88% vs 0.40% for QQQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

QQQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.18% compared to 1.33%.

They track different benchmarks: QQQ is linked to Nasdaq-100 Index while YMAX tracks Basket (Yieldmax ETFs), which means their performance drivers differ.

QQQ is the larger fund by assets ($440.3B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, QQQ would generate roughly $3.33/month, while YMAX would produce $499.00/month, at current distribution rates.

QQQ yield0.40%
YMAX yield59.88%
Monthly diff on $10K$495.67

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, QQQ would cost approximately $180 in fees vs $1,330 for YMAX (simplified, not compounded). The $1,150.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

QQQ ER0.18%
YMAX ER1.33%

Strategy & risk

QQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach, while YMAX tracks Basket (Yieldmax ETFs) using a covered call strategy.

QQQ beta1.18
YMAX beta—

Fund details

QQQ is managed by Invesco (launched 03/10/1999) with $440.3B in assets. YMAX is managed by YieldMax (launched 01/16/2024) with $390M in assets.

QQQ AUM$440.3B
YMAX AUM$390M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is QQQ or YMAX better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. YMAX currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between QQQ and YMAX?

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth strategy, while YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs) tracks Basket (Yieldmax ETFs) with a covered call approach. They are issued by Invesco and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both QQQ and YMAX?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, QQQ or YMAX?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while YMAX charges 1.33%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in QQQ vs YMAX generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in QQQ would generate roughly $3.33 per month ($40.00 annually). The same in YMAX would produce about $499.00 per month ($5,988.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

QQQ vs YMAX — at a glance

Generated April 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

QQQ is a straightforward index ETF tracking the Nasdaq-100, giving you exposure to 100 of the largest non-financial stocks traded on Nasdaq with minimal fees. YMAX is a fund-of-funds that invests in YieldMax's suite of covered-call ETFs, layering options strategies on top of individual mega-cap stocks to generate weekly distributions. The core difference: QQQ offers pure index equity exposure; YMAX is a synthetic income vehicle built from options overlays.

How they differ

QQQ holds the actual companies in the Nasdaq-100 directly. YMAX holds other YieldMax ETFs, each of which sells covered calls against individual stocks like Apple, Tesla, and Microsoft to harvest option premiums. That structural choice creates a massive yield gap: QQQ yields 0.45%, while YMAX distributes 55.96% annually—but YMAX's distribution rate depends entirely on option prices and realized volatility, not underlying dividend growth.

The second key difference is volatility and drawdown behavior. QQQ has a beta of 1.11, meaning it tracks the broad tech market with slight amplification. YMAX reports a beta of 0.0, which is unusual for an equity fund and likely reflects its options construction; in reality, covered-call portfolios tend to cushion downside but cap upside. YMAX is also much newer (inception January 2024) and holds just $375 million in assets versus QQQ's $372 billion, raising questions about liquidity and fee sustainability.

Fees add another layer. QQQ charges 0.18% annually. YMAX charges 1.33%—nearly seven times higher—which erodes that headline yield meaningfully. Over time, a 1.15% fee gap compounds.

Who each is best for

QQQ: Growth-oriented investors with a medium to long time horizon who want broad exposure to tech and mega-cap growth stocks with tax efficiency and minimal drag; works in taxable or tax-advantaged accounts.

YMAX: High-income-seeking investors comfortable with weekly distributions, willing to accept capped capital appreciation and potential NAV erosion in exchange for current yield; best suited for tax-advantaged accounts (IRAs, 401(k)s) where frequent distributions don't trigger tax friction.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion and return-of-capital risk. A 55.96% distribution rate on a fund with a 1.33% expense ratio leaves little room for underlying equity growth to sustain distributions. The fund may rely on return of capital or NAV decay. Since inception (Jan 2024), YMAX has traded as low as $7.47 from a recent $14.14 high—a 47% drawdown in under two years—suggesting distributions may not have been backed by underlying price appreciation.
  • Options complexity and volatility dependency. Covered-call strategies cap upside when markets rally sharply and rely on sustained or elevated implied volatility to generate premium income. If volatility collapses, YMAX distributions will likely fall.
  • Liquidity and scale. YMAX holds just $375 million in assets and is barely two years old. QQQ has $372 billion and 27 years of trading history. Redemptions or outflows could force YMAX to liquidate positions at disadvantageous times.
  • Concentration within a fund of funds. YMAX doesn't own individual stocks; it owns YieldMax ETFs, adding a layer of indirect exposure and reinvesting in products controlled by the same issuer.

Bottom line

If you want equity upside with low fees and broad tech exposure, QQQ is the straightforward choice. If you're chasing current income and can tolerate capped appreciation and meaningful downside risk, YMAX's weekly distributions are real—but the cost structure and short history suggest they may not be sustainable at current rates without erosion of principal. Past performance, particularly for a fund under two years old, does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.