DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

QQQ vs YMAX: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Invesco QQQ Trust and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 5, 2026

ETFs255
Total AUM$971B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major player in the ETF space known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of 71 funds spanning multiple investment themes and strategies. Their portfolio spans income-focused funds, factor-based equity strategies, commodity exposure, digital assets, ESG investing, and the popular Invesco QQQ family tracking the Nasdaq-100, serving both income-seeking and growth-oriented investors. The issuer is particularly recognized for specialized offerings like BulletShares (laddered bond funds), sector rotation strategies, and thematic investing options, making it a comprehensive choice for investors seeking varied exposures beyond traditional index funds.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQ.

ETFs60
Total AUM$9.78B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on YMAX.

Side-by-side snapshot

QQQYMAX
Full nameInvesco QQQ TrustYieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
IssuerInvescoYieldMax
Last Close$712.60 as of July 5, 2026$7.92 as of July 5, 2026
Distribution yield0.45%47.93%
Distribution Safety Score9555
Expense ratio0.18%1.28%
AUM$481B$420M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyWeekly
Underlying indexNasdaq-100 IndexBasket (Yieldmax ETFs)
ObjectiveTrack the Nasdaq-100 Index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq stocks.Covered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date03/10/199901/16/2024
Beta1.231.5515
Last dividend$0.7941$0.0730
Ex-dividend date12/21/202607/01/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

QQQ has outpaced YMAX over the trailing twelve months, posting a 30.76% total return against -6.59%. Measured from Jan 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — QQQ has compounded at 26.22% a year versus 10.32% for YMAX. QQQ has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 18.3% against 24.6% for YMAX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Jan 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
QQQ16.37%30.76%26.22%18.3%1.221.73-12.0%
YMAX-5.69%-6.59%10.32%24.6%-0.46-0.59-26.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jan 2024” measures every fund from January 17, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) and YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

YMAX offers the higher yield at 47.93% vs 0.45% for QQQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

QQQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.18% compared to 1.28%.

They track different benchmarks: QQQ is linked to Nasdaq-100 Index while YMAX tracks Basket (Yieldmax ETFs), which means their performance drivers differ.

QQQ is the larger fund by assets ($481B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, QQQ would generate roughly $3.75/month, while YMAX would produce $399.42/month, at current distribution rates.

QQQ yield0.45%
YMAX yield47.93%
Monthly diff on $10K$395.67

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, QQQ would cost approximately $180 in fees vs $1,280 for YMAX (simplified, not compounded). The $1,100.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

QQQ ER0.18%
YMAX ER1.28%

Strategy & risk

QQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach, while YMAX tracks Basket (Yieldmax ETFs) with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.23 for QQQ and 1.5515 for YMAX, indicating QQQ is less volatile relative to the market.

QQQ beta1.23
YMAX beta1.5515

Fund details

QQQ is managed by Invesco (launched 03/10/1999) with $481B in assets. YMAX is managed by YieldMax (launched 01/16/2024) with $420M in assets.

QQQ AUM$481B
YMAX AUM$420M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is QQQ or YMAX better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. YMAX currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between QQQ and YMAX?

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach, while YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs) tracks Basket (Yieldmax ETFs) with a covered call approach. They are issued by Invesco and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both QQQ and YMAX?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, QQQ or YMAX?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while YMAX charges 1.28%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in QQQ vs YMAX generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in QQQ would generate roughly $3.75 per month ($45.00 annually). The same in YMAX would produce about $399.42 per month ($4,793.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, QQQ or YMAX?

QQQ has outpaced YMAX over the trailing twelve months, posting a 30.76% total return against -6.59%. Measured from Jan 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — QQQ has compounded at 26.22% a year versus 10.32% for YMAX. QQQ has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 18.3% against 24.6% for YMAX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

QQQ vs YMAX — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

QQQ is a $481B index ETF tracking the Nasdaq-100, giving investors broad exposure to 100 of the largest non-financial tech and growth stocks. YMAX is a $420M fund-of-funds that holds YieldMax's suite of single-stock covered-call ETFs, synthetically enhancing income through options strategies. The core difference: QQQ is a buy-and-hold growth tracker; YMAX is an options-income vehicle that sells call premium on a basket of underlying stocks to generate vastly higher distributions.

How they differ

QQQ offers vanilla index exposure to large-cap growth with minimal friction: a 0.18% expense ratio, quarterly distributions yielding 0.44%, and a beta of 1.23 reflecting its tech tilt. YMAX pursues synthetic income by layering covered calls across multiple single-stock option ETFs, charging 1.28% in fees while distributing a 50.99% annualized yield paid weekly. The second difference lies in structure: QQQ is a direct index tracker, while YMAX is a fund of funds with embedded derivative complexity and higher operational overhead. Third, YMAX's beta of 1.5515 is notably higher than QQQ's 1.23, and it has been in existence for less than a year (since January 2024), whereas QQQ has 25+ years of history.

Who each is best for

QQQ: Fits investors seeking broad, liquid exposure to large-cap growth stocks with minimal cost and a long track record, who are comfortable with modest income but prioritize capital appreciation and simplicity.

YMAX: Fits income-focused investors with high current-yield needs and shorter time horizons who understand that covered-call strategies cap upside, tolerate weekly distributions and derivative complexity, and accept elevated structural and operational costs.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yield levels: YMAX's 50.99% distribution rate substantially exceeds typical underlying total returns; the fund is likely relying on return-of-capital treatment and gradual NAV decay. At this payout rate, principal erosion is a core structural feature, not an edge case.
  • Covered-call upside cap: YMAX's strategy systematically sells away gains above the strike prices of the underlying calls. In a sustained rally, this caps appreciation; QQQ holders capture full participation in Nasdaq-100 gains.
  • Fund-of-funds layering and concentration: YMAX holds YieldMax single-stock option ETFs, adding a second layer of fees and operational risk. Concentration within a subset of large-cap names (via the chosen YieldMax holdings) may amplify idiosyncratic risk compared to QQQ's 100-stock index diversification.
  • Short history and option expiration timing: YMAX launched in January 2024; there is no history through a full market cycle or volatility regime. Weekly distributions tied to option-roll timing create reinvestment uncertainty and potential tax complexity.
  • Beta elevation and tail risk: YMAX's beta of 1.5515 exceeds QQQ's 1.23, suggesting amplified downside in a broad equity drawdown. Covered-call positions provide some downside cushion via premium collected, but this is not a hedge in severe corrections.

Bottom line

QQQ suits investors who want low-cost, transparent exposure to growth-stock upside with modest income as a secondary feature. YMAX appeals to those willing to trade upside capping and structural complexity for immediate high income, though the 50.99% yield signal that NAV erosion is embedded in its design. Neither is "better"—the choice hinges on whether you prioritize total return potential and simplicity or immediate high distributions with known principal decay.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.