Generated August 15, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
Overview
These four securities all generate weekly income from Tesla exposure, but deploy sharply different mechanical strategies. TSII and TSLY use synthetic covered calls (selling upside to fund income); TSLW layers 120% leverage atop Tesla stock to amplify returns before distribution; TSYY sells put spreads on leveraged Tesla ETFs and caps upside through a collar structure. All four launched between late 2022 and mid-2025, making them nascent vehicles in a crowded single-stock income space.
How they differ
The biggest difference is leverage and cap structure. TSLW explicitly targets 120% of Tesla's weekly return via leverage—the highest beta at 2.47 and the highest distribution rate at 56.92%. TSII, TSLY, and TSYY all cap upside via options overlays (covered calls or collars) and deliver yields between 42–46%, but sacrifice capital appreciation for income stability.
Second, expense ratios and AUM tell a tale of market acceptance. TSLY dominates in scale at $662M AUM and charges 1.01%; TSLW is tiny at $970K AUM despite a 0.99% expense ratio. TSII ($28.6M) and TSYY ($60.6M) sit in between. TSII's 1.52% expense ratio is the highest, reflecting its retail-focused overlay complexity.
Third, the underlying mechanics differ meaningfully. TSII holds Tesla stock plus a call spread and protective put (a collar). TSLW buys leveraged Tesla exposure outright. TSLY never owns Tesla—it's a pure synthetic play via options that caps gains and sells short calls. TSYY sells put spreads on leveraged Tesla ETFs (not Tesla directly), adding a layer of indirection and structural complexity. Beta ranges from 1.40 (TSYY, TSLY) to 2.47 (TSLW), reflecting these structural choices.
Who each is best for
TSII: Fits investors who want weekly income from Tesla with modest leverage (beta 2.16) and a price of entry below $13, willing to pay higher fees for a traditional collar structure.
TSLW: Designed for income seekers comfortable with explicit 120% leverage who prioritize the highest distribution rate and accept beta of 2.47 and micro-cap liquidity risk.
TSLY: Matches longer-tenure income investors with $662M in AUM seeking a synthetic covered-call approach that caps upside but avoids direct Tesla ownership, with lower fees and moderate beta of 1.49.
TSYY: Fits investors interested in put-spread mechanics on leveraged Tesla ETFs who want weekly income with a collar cap and lower beta (1.40) than direct leveraged structures.
Key risks to know
- NAV erosion at 40–57% annualized yields. All four funds distribute 40%+ annually. At such rates, NAV tends to erode unless Tesla returns exceed the payout—a high bar for sustained holding. TSLW's 56.92% yield is the most exposed to this risk.
- Call caps limit upside in strong Tesla rallies. TSII, TSLY, and TSYY all cap gains via short calls or collar structures. If Tesla surges >20% in a year, these funds trail a buy-and-hold investor; synthetic structures like TSLY face counterparty and exercise settlement risk.
- Leverage risk in TSLW and TSYY's underlying. TSLW uses 120% leverage directly; TSYY's put spreads reference leveraged Tesla ETFs. Both amplify losses in sharp downturns and reset daily (in TSLW) or weekly (TSYY), raising path-dependent losses.
- Extreme beta dispersion and time-to-stability. TSII (beta 2.16) and TSLW (beta 2.47) are highly volatile relative to Tesla stock. TSYY and TSLY (both ~1.4) dampen volatility through options structures, but inception dates range from November 2022 (TSLY, the only multi-year track record) to mid-2025 (TSII). Newer funds lack tested behavior in tail events.
- Single-stock and micro-cap liquidity. All four concentrate entirely on Tesla. TSLW's $970K AUM raises spreads and slippage risk; even TSII at $28.6M is illiquid relative to its peers. Synthetic structures (TSLY, TSYY) add counterparty or ETF creep risk.
Bottom line
If you want established synthetic covered-call mechanics and $662M in AUM, TSLY stands out; if you're willing to accept direct leverage and the highest yield, TSLW fits, but with micro-cap liquidity. If you prefer a traditional collar with direct Tesla ownership, TSII delivers that at the cost of a higher expense ratio. If you're drawn to put spreads on leveraged products, TSYY offers lower beta—but all four carry meaningful NAV erosion risk at their stated yields and depend entirely on Tesla's ability to outpace 40–57% annual payouts. Past performance, especially over these brief inception windows, doesn't predict future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.