DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

XAR vs XSPC: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF and VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 31, 2026

ETFs180
Total AUM$2036B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XAR.

ETFs3
Total AUM$24.7M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VegaShares operates a focused suite of two income-focused ETFs designed to generate regular distributions through options strategies and dividend investing. The firm's lineup includes ODTE and VAIE, both emphasizing yield generation for investors seeking regular cash flow. With a specialized niche in options-based and dividend income strategies, VegaShares targets investors prioritizing distributions over capital appreciation.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XSPC.

Side-by-side snapshot

XARXSPC
Full nameSPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETFVegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF
IssuerState StreetVegaShares
Last Close$264.86 as of July 31, 2026$18.62 as of July 31, 2026
Distribution yield0.09%
Distribution Safety Score™ 63
Expense ratio0.35%0.75%
AUM$5.95B$1.85M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyNone
Underlying indexS&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index
ObjectiveTracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, an equal-weighted index of U.S. aerospace and defense companies.Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date09/28/201106/15/2026
Beta1.26
Last dividend$0.0620
Ex-dividend date06/22/2026

— Distribution yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because XSPC launched June 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineChoose XAR if you want higher current income (0.09% while XSPC makes no distribution). Choose XSPC if you want broad equity exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

XAR has outpaced XSPC over the year to date, posting a 5.84% total return against -26.01%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTDSince Jun 2026
XAR5.84%-5.99%
XSPC-26.01%-26.01%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 31, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2026” measures every fund from June 16, 2026 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window.

Quick verdict

XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

XAR currently shows a 0.09% distribution yield. XSPC has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

XAR is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.35% compared to 0.75%.

XAR has $5.95B in assets vs $1.85M for XSPC, but XSPC only launched June 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, XAR would generate roughly $0.75/month, while XSPC has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

XAR yield0.09%
XSPC yield

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, XAR would cost approximately $350 in fees vs $750 for XSPC (simplified, not compounded). The $400.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

XAR ER0.35%
XSPC ER0.75%

Strategy & risk

XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while XSPC is an ETF.

XAR beta1.26
XSPC beta

Fund details

XAR is managed by State Street (launched 09/28/2011) with $5.95B in assets. XSPC is managed by VegaShares (launched 06/15/2026) with $1.85M in assets.

XAR AUM$5.95B
XSPC AUM$1.85M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of XAR or XSPC pays more dividend income?

XAR currently reports a distribution yield, while XSPC has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between XAR and XSPC?

XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) is an ETF. They are issued by State Street and VegaShares respectively.

Can I hold both XAR and XSPC?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, XAR or XSPC?

XAR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while XSPC charges 0.75%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in XAR vs XSPC generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in XAR would generate roughly $0.75 per month ($9.00 annually). XSPC has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, XAR or XSPC?

XAR has outpaced XSPC over the year to date, posting a 5.84% total return against -26.01%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.